Article published in:
Constructions in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Susan Hunston and Florent Perek
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3] 2019
► pp. 324–353

Patterns, constructions, and applied linguistics

| University of Birmingham
This paper proposes an alignment between aspects of pattern grammar (Francis, 1993; Hunston & Francis, 2000) and construction grammar (Goldberg, 2006). Pattern Grammar describes the grammatical behaviour of individual words at a specific level of generality. The paper claims that grammar patterns and the groups of words identified as occurring with them can be used to propose candidate constructions. This claim is illustrated with verbs and with adjectives. The paper proposes that the term ‘construction’ be used to refer to a sub-set of instances of a grammar pattern, that sub-set identified by the occurrence of a limited set of node words. It also proposes that the Pattern Grammar reference resources that are already available be reconfigured as a constructicon. The paper discusses how constructions could be presented to (English) language teachers and learners and how a constructicon might be organised.
Keywords: Construction Grammar, pattern grammar, constructicon
Published online: 27 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00015.hun
References

References

Bednarek, M.
(2008) Emotion Talk Across Corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broccias, C.
(2006) Cognitive approaches to grammar. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 81–115). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M.
(2004) Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2015) What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it? Frontiers in Psychology, 6 , 852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., Römer, U. & O’Donnell, M.
(2016) Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.
(1982) Frame semantics. In SICOL (Eds). Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. & Baker, C.
(2010) A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 313–341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Johnson, C. & Petrick, M.
(2003) Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16 (3), 235–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 354 ]
Fillmore, C., Kay, P. & O’Connor, M.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64 (3), 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, G.
(1993) A corpus-driven approach to grammar – principles, methods and examples. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.) Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 137–156). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) ‘Hugh’s across all that’: Some changing uses of prepositions. In N. Groom, M. Charles & S. John (Eds.): Corpora, Grammar and Discourse (pp. 73–96). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E.
(1996) Collins cobuild Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
(1998) Collins cobuild Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N.
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (3), 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. & Jackendoff, R.
(2004) The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80 (3), 532–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Wulff, S.
(2009) Psycholinguistic and corpus-linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 , 163–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R.
(1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Hanks, P.
(1987) Definitions and explanations. In Sinclair, J. (Ed.) Looking up: An Account of the Cobuild Project in Lexical Computing (pp. 116–136). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
(2008) Lexical patterns: From Hornby to Hunston and beyond. Proceedings of Euralex 2008. Retrieved from http://​www​.euralex​.org​/elx​_proceedings​/Euralex2008 (last accessed April 2019).
(2013) Analyzing the Lexicon: Norms and Exploitations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, T.
(2014) Idiosyncrasies and generalizations: Argument structure, semantic roles and the valency realization principle. In T. Herbst, H. J. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (Eds.) Constructions, Collocations, Patterns (pp. 167–216). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Construction Grammar: Introduction. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornby, A. S.
(1974) Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2004) The corpus, grammar patterns, and lexicography. Lexicographica, 20 , 100–113.Google Scholar
(2014) Pattern grammar in context. In T. Herbst, H. J. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (Eds.) Constructions, Collocations, Patterns (pp. 99–120). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. & Francis, G.
(2000) Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 355 ]
Hunston, S. & Su, H.
(2017) Pattern, construction and local grammar: The case of evaluation. Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madabushi, H. R. & Hunston, S.
(2016) Identifying patterns. Unpublished research report, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Ohara, K. & Torrent, T.
(Eds.) (2018) Constructicography. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. et al.
(Eds.) (1987) Collins Cobuild English Learner’s Dictionary. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (1995) Collins Cobuild English Dictionary. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teubert, W.
(2005) My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10 (1), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sinclair, pattern grammar and the question of hatred . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12 (2), 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vetchinnikova, S.
(2017) Second Language Lexis and the Idiom Principle (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Wible, D. & Tsao, N. L.
(2017) Constructions and the problem of discovery: A case for the Paradigmatic. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Advance online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], Crossref logo
Green, Clarence
2020. Extensive reading and viewing as input for academic vocabulary: A large-scale vocabulary profile coverage study of students’ reading and writing across multiple secondary school subjects. Lingua 239 ► pp. 102838 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.