Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 10:3 (2005) ► pp.283–305
A critique of the concept of semantic prosody
The concept of semantic prosody was introduced to the public by Bill Louw in 1993, and has become one of the more important concepts in corpus linguistics. However, while other concepts such as collocation, colligation and semantic preference are relatively unproblematic, one cannot say the same for semantic prosody. At present, it is defined in at least three, distinctly different ways, and more significantly, these differences remain largely undiscussed. This article offers a detailed analysis of Louw's concept of semantic prosody (in Sections 1 through 3), and hopes to demonstrate that the concept and the arguments for it are unconvincing. Concluding the article (Sections 4 and 5) is a brief reflection on the paradox created by Louw's use of metaphor in his definition of semantic prosody.
Keywords: connotation, corpus linguistics, metaphor, priming, semantic prosody, collocation
Cited by
Cited by 40 other publications
Alcaraz-Mármol, Gema & Jorge Soto-Almela
2022. Refugees’ dehumanization in the Spanish media: A corpus-assisted study within the semantic preference framework
. Applied Linguistics Review 13:5 ► pp. 791 ff. 
BREMS, LIESELOTTE
2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Buts, Jan
2020. Phobia: a corpus study of political diagnostics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7:1
Carr, Georgia & Monika Bednarek
2019. Beyond risk and safety? Identifying shifts in sex education advice targeted at young women. Discourse & Society 30:3 ► pp. 225 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Alison Findlay
2020. National identities in the context of Shakespeare’sHenry V: Exploring contemporary understandings through collocations. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:3 ► pp. 203 ff.
De Clerck, Bernard, Martine Delorge & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2011. Semantic and Pragmatic Motivations for Constructional Preferences. Journal of English Linguistics 39:4 ► pp. 359 ff.
DiMuccio-Failla, P. V. & Laura Giacomini
2017. Designing a Learner’s Dictionary with Phraseological Disambiguators. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 290 ff.
Dushku, Silvana & Youngshil Paek
2021. Investigating ESL learners’ awareness of semantic prosody across proficiency levels. Language Awareness 30:3 ► pp. 234 ff.
Gabrielatos, Costas & Paul Baker
2008. Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding. Journal of English Linguistics 36:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Giugliano, Marcello
2022. Discourses about independence: A corpus-based analysis of discourse prosodies in Spanish and Catalan newspapers. Discourse & Communication 16:5 ► pp. 525 ff.
Grabowski, Łukasz
2022. Provoke or encourage improvements? On semantic prosody in English-to-Polish translation. Perspectives 30:1 ► pp. 120 ff.
Gries, Stefan Th.
2009. What is Corpus Linguistics?. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:5 ► pp. 1225 ff.
Hauser, David J. & James Hillman
2024. What Does It Mean to Be “Utterly Content”? Semantic Prosody Impacts Nuanced Inferences Beyond Just Valence. Social Cognition 42:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Jurko, Primož
2017. Pragmatic meaning in contrast: semantic prosodies of Slovene and English. Perspectives 25:1 ► pp. 157 ff.
Jurko, Primož
2022. Semantic prosody of Slovene adverb–verb collocations: introducing the top-down approach. Corpora 17:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Kamasa, Victoria
2014. Techniki językoznawstwa korpusowego wykorzystywane w krytycznej analizie dyskursu. Przegląd. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 10:2 ► pp. 100 ff.
KOŞUMCU, Selenay
2023. “defa, kere ve kez” Sözcüklerinin Eşdizimliliği Üzerine Derlem Tabanlı Bir İnceleme. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi
Liu, Jianpeng, Luyao Zhang & Xiaohui Bai
2022. Dependency network-based approach to the implicit structure and semantic diffusion modes of semantic prosody. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:3 ► pp. 505 ff.
Malory, Beth
2023. Polarized Discourses of Abortion in English: A Corpus-based Study of Semantic Prosody and Discursive Salience. Applied Linguistics
Martič, Matjaž
2022. Semantična prozodija v specializiranih besedilih. Journal for Foreign Languages 14:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
McIntyre, Dan
2018. Chapter 5. Irony and semantic prosody revisited. In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30], ► pp. 81 ff.
Omidian, Taha & Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia
2020. Semantic Prosody Revisited: Implications for Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly 54:2 ► pp. 512 ff.
Ooi, V. B.Y.
2008. The Lexis of Electronic Gaming on the Web: A Sinclairian Approach. International Journal of Lexicography 21:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
Oster, Ulrike
2010. Using corpus methodology for semantic and pragmatic analyses: What can corpora tell us about the linguistic expression of emotions?. cogl 21:4 ► pp. 727 ff.
Pace-Sigge, Michael
2018. Where Corpus Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Meet. In Spreading Activation, Lexical Priming and the Semantic Web, ► pp. 29 ff.
Partington, Alan
2014. Evaluative prosody. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 279 ff.
Ramos Ruiz, Álvaro
2022. sustantivos del discurso mediático del Brexit en la prensa económica española. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual 9:4 ► pp. 1 ff.
Snefjella, Bryor & Victor Kuperman
2016. It’s all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing. Cognition 156 ► pp. 135 ff.
Soto-Almela, Jorge & Gema Alcaraz-Mármol
2019. Victims or non-humans: Exploring the semantic preference of refugees in Spanish news articles. Language & Communication 69 ► pp. 11 ff.
Tang, Xuri & Gaixiang Liu
2018. Solving contradictions in semantic prosody analysis with prosody concord. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4 ► pp. 437 ff.
Vessey, Rachelle
2016. Approaches to Language Ideology. In Language and Canadian Media, ► pp. 59 ff.
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019. Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,
Walker, Crayton
2011. How a corpus-based study of the factors which influence collocation can help in the teaching of business English. English for Specific Purposes 30:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
Wang, Yingjie, Matt Coler & Gisela Redeker
2023. A contrastive study on the representation of “Made in China” in Chinese and U.S. newspapers. Frontiers in Communication 8
Winter, Bodo, Martin H. Fischer, Christoph Scheepers & Andriy Myachykov
2023. More is Better: English Language Statistics are Biased Toward Addition. Cognitive Science 47:4
Zhang, Hong
2021. “What do you know about semantic prosody?” Teaching and evaluating implicit knowledge of English with corpus-assisted methods. English in Education 55:4 ► pp. 337 ff.
고언숙
2015. Semantic prosody of the degree adverb nemu: An analysis based on a speech corpus.. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 21:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2019. Chapter 18. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], ► pp. 235 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.