Book review
E. Smitterberg. The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, (2005).
References (24)
References
Arnaud, R. (1998). The development of the progressive in 19th century English: a quantitative survey. Language Variation and Change, 101, 123–152. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitzmaurice, S. M. (2004). The meaning and uses of the progressive construction in an early Eighteenth-century English network. In A. Curzan & K. Emmons (Eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language II: Unfolding Conversations (Topics in English Linguistics 451) (pp. 131–173). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geisler, C. (2003). Gender-based variation in Nineteenth-century English letter writing. In P. Leistyna & C. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 461) (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geisler, C. (2001). Gender-based variation in Nineteenth-century English letter-writing. Paper presented at the
Third North American Symposium on Corpus Linguistics and Language Teaching
, Boston.
Geisler, C. (2000). Investigating register variation in Nineteenth-century English: a multidimensional comparison. Paper presented at the
Second North American Symposium on Corpus Linguistics and Language Teaching
, Flagstaff.
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. (Eds.) (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hundt, M. (2004). Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in modern English. English Language and Linguistics, 81, 47–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Killie, K. (2004). Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics, 81, 25–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, E. (1980). On the context-dependence of the Progressive in English. In C. Rohrer (Ed.), Time, Tense, and Quantifiers: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification (pp. 269–291). Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ljung, M. (1980). Reflections on the English Progressive (Gothenburg Studies in English 461). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mossé, F. (1938). Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique. Vols. I-II1. (Collection linguistique publiée par la Société de linguistique de Paris) (pp. 42–43). Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuñez Pertejo, P. (2004). The Progressive in the History of English. München: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, C. (2004). Use of progressive aspect in 18th-century English: A study of personal letters. In I. Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño & B. Crespo Garcia (Eds.), New Trends in English Historical Linguistics: An Atlantic View (pp. 151–186). Universidade da Coruña.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, N. (2005). A Corpus-based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. PhD thesis submitted at Lancaster University in June 2005.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, N. (2002). ‘Ever moving on? The progressive in recent British English. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), New Frontiers of Corpus Research (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 361) (pp. 317–330). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smitterberg, E. (2004). Investigating the expressive progressive: On Susan M. Fitzmaurice’s ‘The meanings and uses of the progressive construction in an early eighteenth-century English network’. In A. Curzan & K. Emmons (Eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language II. Unfolding Conversations (Topics in English Linguistics 451) (pp. 175–182). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smitterberg, E. (2000a). The progressive form and genre variation during the nineteenth century. In R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R. M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (Eds.), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL (Topics in English Linguistics 311) (pp. 283–297). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smitterberg, E. (2000b). Pragmatic functions of the progressive form in the 19th century. Paper presented at the
Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics
, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000.
Smitterberg, E., Reich, S. & Hahn, A. (2000). The present progressive in political and academic language in the 19th and 20th centuries: a corpus-based investigation. ICAME Journal, 241, 99–118.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, C. (2002). Non-progressive and Progressive Aspect in English. Fasano di Puglia: Schena Editore.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, S. (1994). The mystery of the modal progressive. In D. Kastovsky (Ed.), Studies in Early Modern English (Topics in English Linguistics 131) (pp. 467–485). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)