Review published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 11:4 (2006) ► pp.497506
References
Arnaud, R.
(1998) The development of the progressive in 19th century English: a quantitative survey. Language Variation and Change, 101, 123–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, S. M.
(2004) The meaning and uses of the progressive construction in an early Eighteenth-century English network. In A. Curzan & K. Emmons (Eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language II: Unfolding Conversations (Topics in English Linguistics 451) (pp. 131–173). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geisler, C.
(2003) Gender-based variation in Nineteenth-century English letter writing. In P. Leistyna & C. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 461) (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Investigating register variation in Nineteenth-century English: a multidimensional comparison. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (Eds.), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91) (pp. 249–271). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Gender-based variation in Nineteenth-century English letter-writing. Paper presented at the Third North American Symposium on Corpus Linguistics and Language Teaching , Boston.
(2000) Investigating register variation in Nineteenth-century English: a multidimensional comparison. Paper presented at the Second North American Symposium on Corpus Linguistics and Language Teaching , Flagstaff.
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
(Eds.) (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M.
(2004) Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in modern English. English Language and Linguistics, 81, 47–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Killie, K.
(2004) Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics, 81, 25–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, E.
(1980) On the context-dependence of the Progressive in English. In C. Rohrer (Ed.), Time, Tense, and Quantifiers: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification (pp. 269–291). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ljung, M.
(1980) Reflections on the English Progressive (Gothenburg Studies in English 461). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Mossé, F.
(1938) Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique. Vols. I-II1. (Collection linguistique publiée par la Société de linguistique de Paris) (pp. 42–43). Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Nuñez Pertejo, P.
(2004) The Progressive in the History of English. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Römer, U.
(2005) Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.
(2004) Use of progressive aspect in 18th-century English: A study of personal letters. In I. Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño & B. Crespo Garcia (Eds.), New Trends in English Historical Linguistics: An Atlantic View (pp. 151–186). Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Smith, N.
(2005) A Corpus-based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. PhD thesis submitted at Lancaster University in June 2005.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘Ever moving on? The progressive in recent British English. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), New Frontiers of Corpus Research (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 361) (pp. 317–330). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, E.
(2004) Investigating the expressive progressive: On Susan M. Fitzmaurice’s ‘The meanings and uses of the progressive construction in an early eighteenth-century English network’. In A. Curzan & K. Emmons (Eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language II. Unfolding Conversations (Topics in English Linguistics 451) (pp. 175–182). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000a) The progressive form and genre variation during the nineteenth century. In R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R. M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (Eds.), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL (Topics in English Linguistics 311) (pp. 283–297). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2000b) Pragmatic functions of the progressive form in the 19th century. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics , Santiago de Compostela 7–11 September 2000.
Smitterberg, E., Reich, S. & Hahn, A.
(2000) The present progressive in political and academic language in the 19th and 20th centuries: a corpus-based investigation. ICAME Journal, 241, 99–118.Google Scholar
Williams, C.
(2002) Non-progressive and Progressive Aspect in English. Fasano di Puglia: Schena Editore.Google Scholar
Wright, S.
(1994) The mystery of the modal progressive. In D. Kastovsky (Ed.), Studies in Early Modern English (Topics in English Linguistics 131) (pp. 467–485). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar