Dimensions of variation across Internet registers
This paper presents a study that sought to identify the dimensions of variation underlying a corpus of Internet texts, using Biber’s (1988) multi-dimensional (MD) analysis framework. The corpus was compiled following the method proposed by Biber (1993), according to which the size of each register subcorpus should be determined based on the linguistic variation across the texts. The corpus was tagged using the Biber Tagger and the features were counted and submitted to a factor analysis, which suggested three factors. The factors were interpreted as three dimensions of variation: involved, interactive discourse versus informational focus; expression of stance: interactional evidentiality; and expression of stance: interactional affect. The amount of register variation captured by the register distinctions on the dimensions ranged from 8.7% to 57.1%. Dimension 1 corroborate the oral/involved versus literate/informational distinction defined in previous MD studies of non-Internet registers, whereas Dimensions 2 and 3 highlight the important role played by stance in social media.
Keywords: multi-dimensional analysis, Internet registers, register variation, online communication, social media
- 2.Previous research on Internet registers in the multi-dimensional framework
- 3.Corpus design and collection
- 4.Statistical analysis
- 5.Dimensions of register variation
- 5.1Dimension 1: Involved, interactive discourse versus informational focus
- 5.2Dimension 2: Expression of stance: Interactional evidentiality
- 5.3Dimension 3: Expression of stance: Interactional affect
Published online: 05 October 2018
Berber Sardinha, T.
Berber Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C., & Mayer Acunzo, C.
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M.
(2014) A user-based taxonomy of web registers. Paper presented at the Second Asia-Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference, Hong Kong Polytechnic, Hong Kong.
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A.
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
Biber, D. & Hared, M.
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J.
Claridge, C., & Kytö, M.
Condi de Souza, R.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(2018) Command line tool and library for transferring data with URLs. Retrieved from https://curl.haxx.se (last accessed May 2018).
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M.
Friginal, E., & Hardy, J. A.
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T.
Halliday, M. A. K.
Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E.
Herring, S. C.
Herring, S. C., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T.
Kim, Y. -J. & Biber, D.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
Titak, A., & Roberson, A.
(2018) An easy to use Python library for accessing the Twitter API. Retrieved from http://www.tweepy.org (last accessed May 2018).
Veirano Pinto, M.
Cited by 4 other publications
Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada
Laippala, Veronika, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen
Wang, Yaqin & Haitao Liu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.