Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:2 (2018) ► pp. 125157
References

References

Berber Sardinha, T.
(2014) 25 years later: Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 81–105). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C., & Mayer Acunzo, C.
(2014) A Multidimensional Analysis of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Corpora, 9(2), 239–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M.
(2017) American television and off-screen registers: A corpus-based comparison. Corpora, 12(1), 85–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eds. forthcoming Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues London/New York Bloomsbury
Bertoli-Dutra, P.
(2014) Multi-Dimensional analysis of pop songs. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 149–175). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Besnier, N.
(1988) The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64(4), 707–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1984) A Model of Textual Relations within the Written and Spoken Modes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
(1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Dimensions of Register Variation – A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 152 ]
(2013a) An interview with Douglas Biber [conducted by Bethany Gray]. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(4), 359–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Twenty-five years of Biber’s Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Introduction to the special issue and an interview with Douglas Biber [conducted by Eric Friginal]. Corpora, 8(2), 137–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) A user-based taxonomy of web registers. Paper presented at the Second Asia-Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference, Hong Kong Polytechnic, Hong Kong.
forthcoming). Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto Eds. Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues London/New York Bloomsbury
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A.
(2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
(2016) Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 44(2), 95–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1989) Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Hared, M.
(1994) Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. In D. Biber and E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register (pp. 182–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2006) Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1(1), 1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J.
(2007) Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web (pp. 109–132). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
(1972) Degree Words. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, C., & Kytö, M.
(2014) I had lost sight of them then for a bit, but I went on pretty fast: Two degree modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus. In I. Taavitsainen, A. H. Jucker & J. Tuominen (Eds.), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics (pp. 29–52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collot, M.
(1991) The Situtational Features and Textual Dimensions of Electronic Language. (Unpublished MA thesis). Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Condi de Souza, R.
(2014) Dimensions of variation in TIME magazine. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 177–196). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text – Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D.
(2011) Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 153 ]
(2013) O princípio: Entrevista com David Crystal [The beginning: An interview of David Crystal, conducted by Tania Shepherd and Tania G. Saliés]. In T. M. G. Shepherd & T. Salies (Eds.), Linguística da Internet [Internet Linguistics] (pp. 17–36). São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Curl
(2018) Command line tool and library for transferring data with URLs. Retrieved from https://​curl​.haxx​.se (last accessed May 2018).
Egbert, J.
(2012) Style in nineteenth century fiction: A Multi-Dimensional analysis. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 167–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming). Corpus design and representativeness. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto Eds. Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues London/New York Bloomsbury
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M.
(2015) Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1817–1831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, G., & Hunston, S.
(1996) Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins, COBUILD.Google Scholar
Friginal, E.
(2008) Linguistic variation in the discourse of outsourced call centers. Discourse Studies, 10(6), 715–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E., & Hardy, J. A.
(2014) Conducting Multi-Dimensional analysis using SPSS. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 298–316). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T.
(2010) Variation among blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies (pp. 303–322). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1993) Language and the order of nature. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy as Discursive Power (pp. 117–136). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E.
(2012) Filipino and American online communication and linguistic variation. World Englishes, 31(2), 143–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C.
(Ed.) (1996) Computer-mediated Communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T.
(2013a) Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication (pp. 3–33). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2013b) Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. -J. & Biber, D.
(1994) A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register (pp. 157–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G.
(2007) New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web (pp. 133–150). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mushin, I.
(2001) Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 154 ]
Precht, K.
(2003)  Great vs lovely: Stance differences in American and British English. In P. Leistyna & C. F. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (pp. 133–151). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reppen, R.
(2001) Register variation in student and adult speech and writing. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp. 187–199). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2015) Register variation: A corpus approach. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 1 (pp. 505–525). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Titak, A., & Roberson, A.
(2013) Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora, 8(2), 235–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tweepy
(2018) An easy to use Python library for accessing the Twitter API. Retrieved from http://​www​.tweepy​.org (last accessed May 2018).
Veirano Pinto, M.
(2014) Dimensions of variation in North American movies. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 109–148). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xie, S., Tang, J., & Wang, T.
(2014) Topic related opinion integration for users of social media. In H. Huang, T. Liu, H. -P. Zhang & J. Tang (Eds.), Social Media Processing: Third National Conference, SMP 2014 (pp. 164–174). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bowker, Lynne
2019. Register Variation Online. DouglasBiber and JesseEgbert. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2018. $110.00. 252 pp. (hardcover). (ISBN 9781107122161). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70:11  pp. 1293 ff. Crossref logo
Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada
2021. Characterising Online News Comments: A Multi-Dimensional Cruise Through Online Registers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 Crossref logo
Laippala, Veronika, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen
2021. Exploring the role of lexis and grammar for the stable identification of register in an unrestricted corpus of web documents. Language Resources and Evaluation 55:3  pp. 757 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.