This paper studies the relationship between grammar and language use by comparing word association and collocation. Since word association reveals mental semantic knowledge, usage-based approaches expect word association to mirror the relation between words in use, namely collocation. The paragraph is a more apt unit for collocation than the sentence in mirroring word association. Among measures of collocation, (simple) log likelihood and t-score turn out to be more consistent with association, with log likelihood leading by a small margin over MI or MI3. Overall, word association and collocation are quite close, but not perfectly close because of differences in relevant resources and the characteristics of lexical/semantic relations.
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.) (2000). Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI.
Baroni, M., & Evert, S. (2009). Statistical methods for corpus exploitation. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol.21 (pp 777–803). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Bednarek, M. (2008). Semantic preferences and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119–139.
Burger, H., Dobrovol’skij, D., Kühn, P., & Norrick, N. R. (2007). Phraseology: Subject area, terminology and research topics. In H. Burger, D. Dobrovol’skij, P. Kühn & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Phraseology: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 10–19). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A. (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investing the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2), 125–155.
Evert, S. (2009). Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol.2 (pp. 1212–1248). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Firth, J. R. (1957). Modes of meaning. In J. R. Firth, Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glynn, D. (2010). Synonymy, lexical fields, and grammatical constructions: A study in usage-based cognitive semantics. In H. -J. Schmid & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Usage Patterns (pp. 89–117). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1999). Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Janda, L. A. (Ed.) (2013). Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kent, G. H., & Rosanoff, A. J. (1910) A study of association in insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 67(2), 317-390.
Kiss, G., Armstrong, C., Milroy, R., & Piper, J. (1973). An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey & N. Hamilton-SMmith (Eds.), The Computer and Literary Studies (pp. 153–165). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A. (2001). Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman.
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer. In M. Baker, G. Francis & T. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honor of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics 11, 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGee, I. (2009). Adjective-noun collocations in elicited corpus data: Similarities, differences, and the whys and wherefores. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 79–103.
Michelbacher, L., Evert, S., & Schütze, H. (2011). Asymmetry in corpus-derived and human word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 245–276.
Mollin, S. (2009). Combining corpus linguistic and psychological data on word co-occurrences: Corpus collocates versus word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(2), 175–200.
Padó, S., & Lapata, M. (2007). Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 161–199.
Rapp, R. (2002). The computation of word associations: Comparing syntagmatic and paradigmatic approaches. In S. C. Tseng, T. E. Chen & Y. E. Liu (Eds.), COLING 2002: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistic 1 (pp. 1–7). Taipei: Howard International House.
Schulte im Walde, S., Melinger, A., Roth, M., & Weber, A. (2008). An empirical characterisation of response types in German association norms. Research on Language and Computation, 6(2), 205–238.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spence, D. P., & Owens, K. C. (1990). Lexical co-occurrence and association norms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(5), 317–330.
Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic prosodies: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Foundations of Language, 2(1), 23–55.
Tummers, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2005). Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(2), 225–261.
Wettler, M., Rapp, R., & Sedlmeier, P. (2005). Free word associations correspond to contiguities between words in texts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12(2/3), 111–122.
Widdows, D. (2004). Geometry and Meaning. Stanford: CSLI.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Naismith, Ben & Alan Juffs
2024. Finding the sweet spot: Learners’ productive knowledge of mid-frequency lexical items. Language Teaching Research 28:3 ► pp. 1106 ff.
Raet, Mai
2023. When Negative Turns out to Be Positive. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 8:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
2022. Measuring associational thinking through word embeddings. Artificial Intelligence Review 55:3 ► pp. 2065 ff.
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2021. A Smart e-Learning System for Data-Driven Grammar Learning. In Smart Education and e-Learning 2021 [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 240], ► pp. 77 ff.
Fitzpatrick, Tess & Peter Thwaites
2020. Word association research and the L2 lexicon. Language Teaching 53:3 ► pp. 237 ff.
2019. Exploring Collocations with The Prime Machine. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 9:3 ► pp. 29 ff.
Vivas, Leticia, Laura Manoiloff, Adolfo M. García, Francisco Lizarralde & Jorge Vivas
2019. Core Semantic Links or Lexical Associations: Assessing the Nature of Responses in Word Association Tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.