Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:1 (2018) ► pp. 85113
References
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(Eds.) (2000) Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Baroni, M., & Evert, S.
(2009) Statistical methods for corpus exploitation. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol.21 (pp 777–803). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W.
(1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M.
(2008) Semantic preferences and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S.
(2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burger, H., Dobrovol’skij, D., Kühn, P., & Norrick, N. R.
(2007) Phraseology: Subject area, terminology and research topics. In H. Burger, D. Dobrovol’skij, P. Kühn & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Phraseology: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 10–19). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P.
(1990) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, T.
(1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A.
(2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investing the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2), 125–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evert, S.
(2009) Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol.2 (pp. 1212–1248). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R.
(1957) Modes of meaning. In J. R. Firth, Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2010) Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, D.
(2010) Synonymy, lexical fields, and grammatical constructions: A study in usage-based cognitive semantics. In H. -J. Schmid & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Usage Patterns (pp. 89–117). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D., & Robinson, J. A.
(Eds.) (2014) Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy. Amsderdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th
(2013) 50-something years of work on collocation: What is or should be next … International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 137–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
(1999) Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A.
(Ed.) (2013) Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, G. H., & Rosanoff, A. J.
(1910) A study of association in insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 67(2), 317-390.Google Scholar
Kiss, G., Armstrong, C., Milroy, R., & Piper, J.
(1973) An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey & N. Hamilton-SMmith (Eds.), The Computer and Literary Studies (pp. 153–165). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A.
(2001) Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Louw, B.
(1993) Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer. In M. Baker, G. Francis & T. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honor of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1977) Semantics 11, 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.Google Scholar
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H.
(1999) Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGee, I.
(2009) Adjective-noun collocations in elicited corpus data: Similarities, differences, and the whys and wherefores. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michelbacher, L., Evert, S., & Schütze, H.
(2011) Asymmetry in corpus-derived and human word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 245–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mollin, S.
(2009) Combining corpus linguistic and psychological data on word co-occurrences: Corpus collocates versus word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(2), 175–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padó, S., & Lapata, M.
(2007) Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 161–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, R.
(2002) The computation of word associations: Comparing syntagmatic and paradigmatic approaches. In S. C. Tseng, T. E. Chen & Y. E. Liu (Eds.), COLING 2002: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistic 1 (pp. 1–7). Taipei: Howard International House.Google Scholar
Schulte im Walde, S., Melinger, A., Roth, M., & Weber, A.
(2008) An empirical characterisation of response types in German association norms. Research on Language and Computation, 6(2), 205–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
(2006) Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Bejamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, D. P., & Owens, K. C.
(1990) Lexical co-occurrence and association norms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(5), 317–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(1995) Collocations and semantic prosodies: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Foundations of Language, 2(1), 23–55.Google Scholar
Tummers, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D.
(2005) Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(2), 225–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wettler, M., Rapp, R., & Sedlmeier, P.
(2005) Free word associations correspond to contiguities between words in texts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12(2/3), 111–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdows, D.
(2004) Geometry and Meaning. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Fitzpatrick, Tess & Peter Thwaites
2020. Word association research and the L2 lexicon. Language Teaching 53:3  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Jeaco, Stephen
2019. Exploring Collocations with The Prime Machine. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 9:3  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Naismith, Ben & Alan Juffs
2021. Finding the sweet spot: Learners’ productive knowledge of mid-frequency lexical items. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110204 ff. Crossref logo
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos
2022. Measuring associational thinking through word embeddings. Artificial Intelligence Review 55:3  pp. 2065 ff. Crossref logo
Thwaites, Peter
2020. Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?. The Mental Lexicon 15:3  pp. 464 ff. Crossref logo
Vivas, Leticia, Laura Manoiloff, Adolfo M. García, Francisco Lizarralde & Jorge Vivas
2019. Core Semantic Links or Lexical Associations: Assessing the Nature of Responses in Word Association Tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:1  pp. 243 ff. Crossref logo
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2021.  In Smart Education and e-Learning 2021 [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 240],  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.