Article published In:
Errors and Disfluencies in Spoken CorporaEdited by Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Sylvie De Cock
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16:2] 2011
► pp. 173–197
Edited by Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Sylvie De Cock
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16:2] 2011
► pp. 173–197
Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English
This study is based on the British National Corpus (BNC) and also takes data from the London-Lund Corpus (LLC) into account. It shows that the so-called filled pauses er/uh and erm/um are sociolinguistic markers that differentiate between registers of English and along gender, age and socio-economic class. Men, older people and educated speakers use more fillers than women, younger speakers and less educated speakers. Nasalization is used more often by women, younger speakers and more educated speakers. These sociolinguistic factors can probably partly explain the fact that the use of fillers is higher in the LLC and the context-governed sample of the BNC than in the demographic sample of the BNC. It is argued that a more positive view should be taken of fillers as planning signals, or planners, and that their functions should be submitted to careful discourse analytic study. Their recognition as words will facilitate such an undertaking.
Cited by
Cited by 57 other publications
Adolphs, Svenja & Yaoyao Chen
2021. Corpus Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 639 ff. 
Aijmer, Karin
2014. Pragmatic markers. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 195 ff.
Aijmer, Karin
2015. Analysing Discourse Markers in Spoken Corpora: Actually as a Case Study. In Corpora and Discourse Studies, ► pp. 88 ff.
Altıparmak, Ayşe & Gülmira Kuruoğlu
2018. Gender and Speech Dısfluency Productıon: a Psycholınguıstıc Analysıs on Turkısh Speakers. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 24:2 ► pp. 114 ff.
Altıparmak, Ayşe & Gülmira Kuruoğlu
2018. An Analysis of Speech Disfluencies of Turkish Speakers Based on Age Variable. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:3 ► pp. 699 ff.
Belz, Malte, Simon Sauer, Anke Lüdeling & Christine Mooshammer
Brown, Lucien, Hyunji Kim & Bodo Winter
2022. Is It Polite to Hiss?: Nonverbal Sound Objects as Markers of (Im)politeness in Korean. Frontiers in Communication 7
Clin, Elise & Mikhail Kissine
2023. Listener- Versus Speaker-Oriented Disfluencies in Autistic Adults: Insights From Wearable Eye-Tracking and Skin Conductance Within a Live Face-to-Face Paradigm. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 66:8 ► pp. 2562 ff.
Cossavella, Francisco & Jazmín Cevasco
2021. The importance of studying the role of filled pauses in the construction of a coherent representation of spontaneous spoken discourse. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 33:2 ► pp. 172 ff.
Crible, Ludivine, Liesbeth Degand & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2017. The clustering of discourse markers and filled pauses. Languages in Contrast 17:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Davis, Boyd H. & Margaret A. Maclagan
2020. UH as a pragmatic marker in dementia discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 156 ► pp. 83 ff.
Demirel, Elif Tokdemir & Zeynep Baser
2021. Examination of Speaking Test Performance in Structured Group Tasks. In Design Solutions for Adaptive Hypermedia Listening Software [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 221 ff.
Fruehwald, Josef
2017. Generations, lifespans, and the zeitgeist. Language Variation and Change 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gorman, Kyle, Lindsay Olson, Alison Presmanes Hill, Rebecca Lunsford, Peter A. Heeman & Jan P. H. van Santen
2016. Uh and um in children with autism spectrum disorders or language impairment. Autism Research 9:8 ► pp. 854 ff.
Götz, Sandra
2019. Filled pauses across proficiency levels, L1s and learning context variables. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Huang, Lan-fen, Yen-liang Lin & Tomáš Gráf
2023. Development of the use of discourse markers across different fluency levels of CEFR. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H
2021. Features of orality in the language of fiction: A corpus-based investigation. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:4 ► pp. 341 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2015. Pragmatics of fiction: Literary uses of uh and um. Journal of Pragmatics 86 ► pp. 63 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
Kirjavainen, Minna, Ludivine Crible & Kate Beeching
2022. Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um. Language and Speech 65:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Kirjavainen, Minna & Alexandre Nikolaev
2022. Investigation into the linguistic category membership of the Finnish
planning particle tota
. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 370 ff.
Kosmala, Loulou
2022. Exploring the status of filled pauses as pragmatic markers. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 272 ff.
Kosmala, Loulou
2021. On the specificities of L1 and L2 (dis)fluencies and the interactional multimodal strategies of L2 speakers in tandem interactions. Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 3:1
Kosmala, Loulou & Ludivine Crible
2022. The dual status of filled pauses: Evidence from genre, proficiency and co-occurrence. Language and Speech 65:1 ► pp. 216 ff.
Kosmala, Loulou, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
2020. Euh le saviez-vous ? le rôle des (dis)fluences en contexte interactionnel : étude exploratoire et qualitative. SHS Web of Conferences 78 ► pp. 01018 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli & Miriam A. Locher
2023. Corpus Pragmatics,
Laserna, Charlyn M., Yi-Tai Seih & James W. Pennebaker
2014. Um . . . Who Like Says You Know. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33:3 ► pp. 328 ff.
Lickley, Robin J.
2015. Fluency and Disfluency. In The Handbook of Speech Production, ► pp. 445 ff.
Lim, Jessica
2018. So How Do English Language Learners Use "So"?. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Lin, Yen-Liang
2020. Pragmatic Nature of L2 Communication: Spoken Grammar in Native and EFL Speakers. In Speaking English as a Second Language, ► pp. 51 ff.
Lo, Justin J. H.
2020. BetweenÄh(m)andEuh(m): The Distribution and Realization of Filled Pauses in the Speech of German-French Simultaneous Bilinguals. Language and Speech 63:4 ► pp. 746 ff.
Perera, Kaushalya & Susan Strauss
2015. High-focus and time-immediate indexicals: A study of Sinhala discourse markers me: ‘this’ and dæn ‘now’. Journal of Pragmatics 85 ► pp. 32 ff.
Revis, Melanie & Tobias Bernaisch
2020. The pragmatic nativisation of pauses in Asian Englishes. World Englishes 39:1 ► pp. 135 ff.
Saund, Carolyn & Stacy Marsella
2021. 2021 16th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2021), ► pp. 1 ff.
Staley, Larssyn & Andreas H. Jucker
2021. “The uh deconstructed pumpkin pie”: The use of uh and um in Los Angeles restaurant server talk. Journal of Pragmatics 172 ► pp. 21 ff.
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker
Tayarani, Mohammad, Anna Esposito & Alessandro Vinciarelli
2022. What an “Ehm” Leaks About You: Mapping Fillers into Personality Traits with Quantum Evolutionary Feature Selection Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 13:1 ► pp. 108 ff.
Tottie, Gunnel
2014. Turn management and the fillers uh and um. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 381 ff.
Tottie, Gunnel
Tottie, Gunnel
2016. Planning what to say. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 97 ff.
TOTTIE, GUNNEL
2019. From pause to word:uh, umanderin written American English. English Language and Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Götz & Katja Jäschke
2021. Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Xu, Yang & David Reitter
2018. Information density converges in dialogue: Towards an information-theoretic model. Cognition 170 ► pp. 147 ff.
Yuan, Jiahong, Xingyu Cai, Yuchen Bian, Zheng Ye & Kenneth Church
2021. Pauses for Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease. Frontiers in Computer Science 2
[no author supplied]
2019. Source–Target List. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 463 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Language Index. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 622 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 517 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Source–Target Lexicon. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 34 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Author Index. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 612 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Target–Source List. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 476 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Introduction. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. List of Languages. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 489 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Grammatical Concepts Used in This Work. In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, ► pp. 23 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.