Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:4 (2018) ► pp. 494508
References

References

Balota, D., Yap, M., & Cortese, M. J.
(2006) Visual word recognition. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 285–376). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bracken, S., & Fischel, J. E.
(2008) Family reading behaviour and literacy skills in preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 45–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, S. I., Hong, F. Y., & Hu, H. Y.
(2015) The effects of family cultural capital and reading motivation on reading behaviour in elementary school students. School Psychology International, 36(1), 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C., & Teravainen, A.
(2017) Book Ownership and Reading Outcomes. London: National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
[ p. 507 ]
Drijbooms, E., Groen, M., & Verhoeven, L.
(2017) How executive functions predict development in syntactic complexity of narrative writing in the upper elementary grades. Reading & Writing, 30(1), 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T.
(2009) The emergence of Dutch connectives; how cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 36(4), 829–854. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fayol, M., & Mouchon, S.
(1997) Production and comprehension of connectives in the written modality: A study of written French. In C. Pontecorvo (Ed.), Writing Development: An Interdisciplinary View (pp. 193–204). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, K., Wilson, C., & Landau, B.
(2016) The importance of lexical verbs in the acquisition of spatial prepositions: The case of in and on . Cognition, 157, 174–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, S., & Wanzek, J.
(2016) The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 570–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meints, K., Plunkett, K., Harris, P. L., & Dimmock, D.
(2002) What is ‘on’ and ‘under’ for 15-, 18-, and 24-month-olds? Typicality effects in early comprehension of spatial prepositions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 113–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penning de Vries, B., & Tellings, A.
forthcoming). Development of connective frequency in Dutch child-directed texts: a corpus analysis.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
(2001) The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of Functional Literacy (pp. 189–214). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A.
(1987) The connective “and”: Do older children use it less as they learn other connectives? Journal of Child Language, 14(2), 375–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P., & Garside, R.
(2000) Comparing Corpora using Frequency Profiling. In Proceedings of the workshop on Comparing Corpora, 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000), 1–6. Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Tellings, A., Hulsbosch, M., Vermeer, A., & van den Bosch, A.
(2014) BasiLex: An 11.5 million word corpus of Dutch texts written for children. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands, 4, 191–208.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, A., Busser, G. J., Daelemans, W., & Canisius, S.
(2007) An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for Dutch. In F. van Eynde, P. Dirix, I. Schuurman, & V. Vandeghinste (Eds.), Selected Papers of the 17th Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Meeting (CLIN-17, Leuven), (pp. 99–114). Utrecht: LOT. Retrieved from https://​ilk​.uvt​.nl​/downloads​/pub​/papers​/tadpole​-final​.pdf (last accessed September 2018).
Van Gompel, M.
(2014) FoLiA: Format for linguistic annotation. Documentation, Technical Report Language and Speech Technology Technical Report Series LST-14-01, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
[ p. 508 ]