Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 23:3 (2018) ► pp.255–278
A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts
Using corpus linguistics and qualitative, manual discourse analysis, this paper compares English and French extremist texts to
determine how messages in different languages draw upon similar and distinct discursive themes and linguistic strategies. Findings
show that both corpora focus on religion and rewards (i.e. for faith) and strongly rely on othering strategies. However, the
English texts are concerned with world events whereas the French texts focus on issues specific to France. Also, while the English
texts use Arabic code-switching as a form of legitimation, the French texts use a formal register and quotation from scripture in
discussions of permissions, rights, obligations and laws. Finally, the English texts refer to and justify violence to a greater
extent than the French texts. This paper contributes to the field of terrorism studies and the field of corpus linguistics by
presenting a new approach to corpus-driven studies of discourse across more than one language.
Keywords: French, English, extremism, cross-linguistic corpus analysis, corpus-driven discourse analysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The violent extremism and publications of the Islamic State and al-Qaeda
- 3.Data and methods
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Common categories
- 4.2English categories
- 4.3French categories
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (30)
Aggarwal, N. K. (2017). Exploiting the Islamic State-Taliban rivalry for counterterrorism messaging. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 12(1), 1–15. 
Ali, S. (2015). British Muslims in Numbers. London: The Muslim Council of Britain.
Anthony, L. (2016). AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buril, F. (2017). Changing God’s expectations and women’s consequent behaviors – How ISIS manipulates “Divine Commandments” to influence women’s role in Jihad. Journal of Terrorism Research, 8(3), 1–10.
Conoscenti, M. (2016). ISIS’ Dabiq communicative strategies, NATO and Europe. Who is learning from whom? In M. Ceretta & B. Curli (Eds.), Discourses and Counter-discourses on Europe: From the Enlightenment to the EU (pp. 215–244). London: Routledge.
Droogan, J., & Peattie, S. (2016). Reading jihad: Mapping the shifting themes of Inspire magazine. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(4), 684–717.
Esposito, J. L. (2014). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frampton, M., Fisher, A., & Prucha, N. (2017). The new netwar: Countering extremism online. London: Policy Exchange. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A. (2012, September) Keyness: Appropriate metrics and practical issues. Paper presented at CADS 2012, Bologna, Italy.
Ghilan, M. (2013, June 8). It’s extremist Muslims, not Islamic extremism. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
HM Government. (2013). Tackling extremism in the UK. Cabinet Office: London. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
Ingram, H. J. (2017). An analysis of Inspire and Dabiq: Lessons from AQAP and Islamic State’s propaganda war. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(5), 357–375.
Kramer, M. (2003). Coming to terms, Fundamentalists or Islamists? Middle East Quarterly, (Spring 2003), 65–77.
Laurence, J., & Vaïsse, J. (2006). Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Novenario, C. M. I. (2016). Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State Through Strategies Publicized in Jihadist Magazines. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(11), 953–967.
O’Halloran, K., Tan, S., Wignell, P., Bateman, J. A., Duc-Son, P., Grossman, M., & Vande Moere, A. (2016). Interpreting text and image relations in violent extremist discourse: A mixed methods approach for big data analytics. Terrorism and Political Violence. Advance online publication.
Partington, A. (2004). Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse (pp. 11–20). Bern: Peter Lang.
Prentice, S., Taylor, P., Rayson, P., Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011). Analyzing the semantic content and persuasive composition of extremist media: A case study of texts produced during the Gaza conflict. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 61–73.
Prentice, S., Taylor, P., Rayson, R., & Giebels, E. (2012). Differentiating act from ideology: Evidence from messages for and against violent extremism. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(3), 289–306.
Rayson, P. (2009). Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment [Computer software]. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Vergani, M., & Bliuc, A. M. (2015). The evolution of ISIS’ language: A quantitative analysis of the language of the first year of Dabiq magazine. Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società, 21, 7–20.
Vessey, R. (2013). Challenges in cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), 1–26.
Wignell, P., Tan, S., & O’Halloran, K. (2017a). Under the shade of AK47s: A multimodal approach to violent extremist recruitment strategies for foreign fighters. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(3), 429–452.
(2017b). Violent extremism and iconisation: Commanding good and forbidding evil? Critical Discourse Studies, 14(1), 1–22.
Wignell, P., Tan, S., O’Halloran, K., & Lange, R. (2017c). A mixed methods empirical examination of changes in emphasis and style in the extremist magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Perspectives on Terrorism, 11(2), 2–20.
Zelin, A. Y. (2015). Picture or it didn’t happen: A snapshot of the Islamic State’s official media output. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(4).
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
Etaywe, Awni, Kate Macfarlane & Mamoun Alazab
Osisanwo, Ayo
2024. Delegitimating the Nigerian State and other anti-Boko Haram in selected messages of Abubakar Shekau. Critical Studies on Terrorism ► pp. 1 ff. 
Osisanwo, Ayo
2024. Manipulative and Recruitment Strategies in Boko Haram Terrorist Statements. Journal of Asian and African Studies
Osisanwo, Ayo
2024. Self-legitimation in selected speeches of Abubakar Shekau, the Boko Haram terrorists leader. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff.
Tongjing, Wang, Zhao Yin, Ziyu Bao & Evert Meijers
2024. Intercity relationships between 293 Chinese cities quantified based on toponym co-occurrence. Cybergeo
Patterson, Katie J.
Sun, Ya & Qiong Wang
2023. Mapping the Field of Register Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sage Open 13:4
Tongjing, Wang, Evert Meijers & Huijuan Wang
2023. The multiplex relations between cities: a lexicon-based approach to detect urban systems. Regional Studies 57:8 ► pp. 1592 ff.
Bouko, Catherine, Brigitte Naderer, Diana Rieger, Pieter Van Ostaeyen & Pierre Voué
2022. Discourse patterns used by extremist Salafists on Facebook: identifying potential triggers to cognitive biases in radicalized content. Critical Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 252 ff.
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2022. Identity, ideology and threatening communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Brookes, Gavin & Tony McEnery
2020. Correlation, collocation and cohesion: A corpus-based critical analysis of violent jihadist discourse. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 351 ff.
Caple, Helen, Changpeng Huan & Monika Bednarek
2020. Multimodal News Analysis across Cultures,
Litvinova, Tatiana & Olga Litvinova
2020. Analysis and Detection of a Radical Extremist Discourse Using Stylometric Tools. In Digital Science 2019 [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1114], ► pp. 30 ff.
Tatsenko, Nataliia, Vitalii Stepanov & Hanna Shcherbak
2020. CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF POLITICS IN AMERICAN ENGLISH. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:2 ► pp. 248 ff.
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
Abdelzaher, Esra’ Moustafa
2019. The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study. Corpus Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Litvinova, Tatiana, Olga Litvinova & Galina Zavarzina
2019. Two Views on the 2010 Moscow Metro Bombings: Corpus-Based Contrastive Keyword Analysis. In Digital Transformation and Global Society [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1038], ► pp. 393 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. References. In Introduction to Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 233 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.