Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:3 (2018) ► pp. 255–278

A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts

| Lancaster University
| Birkbeck, University of London
Using corpus linguistics and qualitative, manual discourse analysis, this paper compares English and French extremist texts to determine how messages in different languages draw upon similar and distinct discursive themes and linguistic strategies. Findings show that both corpora focus on religion and rewards (i.e. for faith) and strongly rely on othering strategies. However, the English texts are concerned with world events whereas the French texts focus on issues specific to France. Also, while the English texts use Arabic code-switching as a form of legitimation, the French texts use a formal register and quotation from scripture in discussions of permissions, rights, obligations and laws. Finally, the English texts refer to and justify violence to a greater extent than the French texts. This paper contributes to the field of terrorism studies and the field of corpus linguistics by presenting a new approach to corpus-driven studies of discourse across more than one language.
Keywords: French, English, extremism, cross-linguistic corpus analysis, corpus-driven discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The violent extremism and publications of the Islamic State and al-Qaeda
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Common categories
    • 4.2English categories
    • 4.3French categories
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 29 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak
References

References

Aggarwal, N. K.
(2017) Exploiting the Islamic State-Taliban rivalry for counterterrorism messaging. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 12(1), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ali, S.
(2015) British Muslims in Numbers. London: The Muslim Council of Britain.Google Scholar
Anthony, L.
(2016) AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Baker, P.
(2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
(2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buril, F.
(2017) Changing God’s expectations and women’s consequent behaviors – How ISIS manipulates “Divine Commandments” to influence women’s role in Jihad. Journal of Terrorism Research, 8(3), 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conoscenti, M.
(2016) ISIS’ Dabiq communicative strategies, NATO and Europe. Who is learning from whom? In M. Ceretta & B. Curli (Eds.), Discourses and Counter-discourses on Europe: From the Enlightenment to the EU (pp. 215–244). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Droogan, J., & Peattie, S.
(2016) Reading jihad: Mapping the shifting themes of Inspire magazine. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(4), 684–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, J. L.
(2014) The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frampton, M., Fisher, A., & Prucha, N.
(2017) The new netwar: Countering extremism online. London: Policy Exchange. Retrieved from: https://​policyexchange​.org​.uk​/publication​/the​-new​-netwar​-countering​-extremism​-online/ (last accessed August 2018).
Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A.
(2012, September) Keyness: Appropriate metrics and practical issues. Paper presented at CADS 2012, Bologna, Italy.
Ghilan, M.
(2013, June 8). It’s extremist Muslims, not Islamic extremism. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from http://​www​.aljazeera​.com​/indepth​/opinion​/2013​/06​/2013681251485552​.html (last accessed August 2018).
HM Government
(2013) Tackling extremism in the UK. Cabinet Office: London. Retrieved from https://​www​.gov​.uk​/government​/uploads​/system​/uploads​/attachment​_data/​file​/263181​/ETF​_FINAL​.pdf (last accessed August 2018).
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, H. J.
(2017) An analysis of Inspire and Dabiq: Lessons from AQAP and Islamic State’s propaganda war. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(5), 357–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M.
(2003) Coming to terms, Fundamentalists or Islamists? Middle East Quarterly, (Spring 2003), 65–77.Google Scholar
Laurence, J., & Vaïsse, J.
(2006) Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Novenario, C. M. I.
(2016) Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State Through Strategies Publicized in Jihadist Magazines. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(11), 953–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K., Tan, S., Wignell, P., Bateman, J. A., Duc-Son, P., Grossman, M., & Vande Moere, A.
(2016) Interpreting text and image relations in violent extremist discourse: A mixed methods approach for big data analytics. Terrorism and Political Violence. Advance online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
(2004) Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse (pp. 11–20). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Prentice, S., Taylor, P., Rayson, P., Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B.
(2011) Analyzing the semantic content and persuasive composition of extremist media: A case study of texts produced during the Gaza conflict. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 61–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, S., Taylor, P., Rayson, R., & Giebels, E.
(2012) Differentiating act from ideology: Evidence from messages for and against violent extremism. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(3), 289–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P.
(2009) Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment [Computer software]. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E.
(2001) Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vergani, M., & Bliuc, A. M.
(2015) The evolution of ISIS’ language: A quantitative analysis of the language of the first year of Dabiq magazine. Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società, 21, 7–20.Google Scholar
Vessey, R.
(2013) Challenges in cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wignell, P., Tan, S., & O’Halloran, K.
(2017a) Under the shade of AK47s: A multimodal approach to violent extremist recruitment strategies for foreign fighters. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(3), 429–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Violent extremism and iconisation: Commanding good and forbidding evil? Critical Discourse Studies, 14(1), 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wignell, P., Tan, S., O’Halloran, K., & Lange, R.
(2017c) A mixed methods empirical examination of changes in emphasis and style in the extremist magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Perspectives on Terrorism, 11(2), 2–20.Google Scholar
Zelin, A. Y.
(2015) Picture or it didn’t happen: A snapshot of the Islamic State’s official media output. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(4).Google Scholar

Full-text

A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Introduction to Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 233 ff. Crossref logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics ► pp. 893 ff. Crossref logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ Moustafa
2019. The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study. Corpus Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Bouko, Catherine, Brigitte Naderer, Diana Rieger, Pieter Van Ostaeyen & Pierre Voué
2021. Discourse patterns used by extremist Salafists on Facebook: identifying potential triggers to cognitive biases in radicalized content. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Brookes, Gavin & Tony McEnery
2020. Correlation, collocation and cohesion: A corpus-based critical analysis of violent jihadist discourse. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 351 ff. Crossref logo
Citlak, Amadeusz
2021. The Psychology of the Pursuit for a Sense of Power and Structural Patterns of Biblical Social Relations. Journal of Religion and Health 60:6 ► pp. 3993 ff. Crossref logo
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2021. Identity, ideology and threatening communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict Crossref logo
Litvinova, Tatiana & Olga Litvinova
2020.  In Digital Science 2019 [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1114], ► pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo
Litvinova, Tatiana, Olga Litvinova & Galina Zavarzina
2019.  In Digital Transformation and Global Society [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1038], ► pp. 393 ff. Crossref logo
Patterson, Katie J.
2022. Dualisms in Jihad. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict Crossref logo
Tatsenko, Nataliia, Vitalii Stepanov & Hanna Shcherbak
2020. CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF POLITICS IN AMERICAN ENGLISH. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:2 ► pp. 248 ff. Crossref logo
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.