Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2014) ► pp.201–224

Interactional metadiscourse in young EFL learner writing

A corpus-based study

This study investigates how young English as a foreign language (EFL) learners from Chinese, Spanish, and Polish mother tongue backgrounds use interactional metadiscourse in descriptive and argumentative English essays by drawing data from the ICCI corpus. The quantitative and qualitative analyses show that (i) there are significant differences among the three groups of EFL learners in the use of boosters, attitude markers, self-mentions, and engagement markers; and (ii) there are significant differences between the descriptive essays and the argumentative essays in the use of hedges and self-mentions. Discussion of the results is related to intergroup homogeneity and heterogeneity in the use of metadiscourse and the influences of essay types as well as topics/prompts. Pedagogical implications are provided for teaching interactional metadiscursive resources to young EFL learners from different mother tongue backgrounds and in relation to descriptive and argumentative writing.

Keywords: EFL, learner corpus, writing, interactional metadiscourse
Published online: 9 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.03hon
References
Ädel, A.
2006  Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Involvement features in writing: Do time and interaction trump register awareness?”. In G. Gilquin, Sz. Papp & M.?B. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.), Language and Computers: Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research . Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K.
2002 “Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching .Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–76.Google Scholar
Barlow, M.
2005 “Computer based analyses of learner language”. In R. Ellis & G. Barkhuizen (Eds.), Analysing Learner Language . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–358.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
1999  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bunton, D.
1999 “The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses”. English for Specific Purposes , 181, S41–S56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. & Tannen, D.
1987 “The relation between written and spoken language”. Annual Review of Anthropology , 161, 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X. & Steffensen, M.?S???.
1996 “Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing”. Research in the Teaching of English , 30 (2), 149–181.Google Scholar
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. & Steffensen, M.?S???.
1993 “Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students”. Written Communication , 101, 39–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S.?A???. & McNamara, D.?S???.
2011 “Shared features of L2 writing: Intergroup homogeneity and text classification”. Journal of Second Language Writing , 20 (4), 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, T.
2004 “Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?” Journal of Pragmatics , 361, 1807–1825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A.
2009  Discovering Statistics with SPSS (3rd Ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
1997 “Interpersonal strategies: Investigating interlanguage corpora”. RELC Journal , 28 (1), 72–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G.
2008 “Combining contrastive and interlanguage analysis to apprehend transfer: Detection, explanation, evaluation”. In G. Gilquin, Sz. Papp & M.?B. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.), Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research . Amsterdam: Rodopi, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M.
2008 “Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation”. English Text Construction , 1 (1), 41–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
1996 “From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora”. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in Contrast: Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies . Lund: Lund University Press, 37–51.Google Scholar
1998  Learner English on Computer . London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
2002 “A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Learner corpora”. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook . Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 259–275.Google Scholar
Hinkel, E.
2003 “Adverbial markers and tone in L1 and L2 students’ writing”. Journal of Pragmatics , 35 (7), 1049–1068 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Hedging, inflating, and persuading in L2 academic writing”. Applied Language Learning , 15 (1–2), 29–53.Google Scholar
2009 “The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2 academic writing”. Journal of Pragmatics , 41 (4), 667–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, H.
2009  The Compilation of the Singapore Corpus of Research in Education (SCoRE): A Technical Report for the Ministry of Education . National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
2012 “Compilation and exploration of ICCI corpus for learner language research”. In Y. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi & M. Minegishi (Eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 47–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
2004 “Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing , 131, 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005  Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. & Milton, J.
1997 “Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing , 6 (2), 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. & Tse, P.
2004 “Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal”. Applied Linguistics, 25 (2)1, 156–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IBM Corp
2011  IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 . Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Ji, K.
2011 “The influence of Chinese rhetorical patterns on EFL writing: Learner attitudes towards this influence”. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics , 34 (1), 77–92.Google Scholar
Kuhi, D. & Behnam, B.
2011 “Generic variations and metadiscourse use in the writing of applied linguistics: A comparative study and preliminary framework”. Written Communication , 281, 97–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, G.
1998 “Overstatement in advanced learners’ writing: Stylistic aspects of adjective intensification”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer . London/New York: ­Longman, 53–66.Google Scholar
Markkanen, R., Steffensen, M.?S???. & Crismore, A.
1993 “Quantitative contrastive study of metadiscourse problems in design and analysis of data”. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics , 281, 137–151.Google Scholar
McCann, T.?M???.
1989 “Student argumentative writing: Knowledge and ability at three grade levels”. Research in the Teaching of English , 23 (1), 62–76.Google Scholar
Meunier, F.
2002 “The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119–142.Google Scholar
Neff, J., Ballesteros, F., Dafouz, E., Martinez, F., Rica, J.?P., Díez, M. & Prieto, R.
2004 “Formulating writer stance: A contrastive study of EFL learner corpora”. In C. Ulla & T.?A. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics. A Multidimensional Perspective .Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
2007 “The path from learner corpus analysis to language pedagogy: Some neglected issues”. Language and Computers , 62 (1), 305–315.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M. & Carter, R.
2007  From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching . Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P. & Díez-Bedmar, M.?B???.
2012 “The use of intensifying adverbs in learner writing”. In Y. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi & M. Minegishi (Eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petch-Tyson, S.
1998 “Writer/reader visibility in EFL written discourse”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer . London/New York: Longman, 107–118.Google Scholar
Recski, L.?J???.
2004 “‘It’s really ultimately very cruel …’: Contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse”. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada , 201, 211–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G.
2001 “Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader”. Applied Linguistics , 221, 58–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y.
2012 “International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage: Project overview and a case study on the acquisition of new verb co-occurrence patterns”. In Y. Tono, Y. ­Kawaguchi & M. Minegishi (Eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y. & Minegishi, M. (Eds.)
2012  Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, W.?J???.
1985 “Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse”. College Composition and Communication , 36 (1), 82–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y. & Lei, L.
2011 “The use of amplifiers in the doctoral dissertations of Chinese EFL learners”. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics , 34 (1), 47–61.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

afzaal, Muhammad, Muhammad Ilyas Chishti, Chao Liu, Chenxia Zhang & Jeroen van de Weijer
2021. Metadiscourse in Chinese and American graduate dissertation introductions. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 DOI logo
Chung, Edsoulla, Peter Robert Crosthwaite & Cynthia Lee
2023. The use of metadiscourse by secondary-level Chinese learners of English in examination scripts: insights from a corpus-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
Friginal, Eric, Joseph J. Lee, Brittany Polat & Audrey Roberson
2017. Hedging and Boosting in EAP Classroom Discourse. In Exploring Spoken English Learner Language Using Corpora, ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Victor
2018. Exploring the effectiveness of hotel management's responses to negative online comments. Lingua 216 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Victor & Cissy Li
2018. The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students' timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 33 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken
2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?. Journal of Pragmatics 113 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2018. “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes 51 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Joseph J. & Lydia Deakin
2016. Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing 33 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Lo, Yueh Yea, Juliana Othman & Jia Wei Lim
2021. Mapping the Use of Boosters in Academic Writing by Malaysian First-Year Doctoral Students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 29:3 DOI logo
Man, Deliang & Meng Huat Chau
2019. Learning to evaluate through that-clauses: Evidence from a longitudinal learner corpus. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Qin, Wenjuan & Paola Uccelli
2019. Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts. Journal of Pragmatics 139 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Ruan, Zhoulin
2019. Metadiscourse Use in L2 Student Essay Writing: A Longitudinal Cross-Contextual Comparison. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 42:4 ► pp. 466 ff. DOI logo
Salam El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel
2020. Variation of metadiscourse in L2 writing: Focus on language proficiency and learning context. Ampersand 7 ► pp. 100069 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Xinxin & He Yang
2022. A comparative analysis of English for academic purposes teachers’ interactive metadiscourse across the British and Chinese contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Xia, Jie
2020. “Loving you”: Use of metadiscourse for relational acts in WeChat public account advertisements. Discourse, Context & Media 37 ► pp. 100416 ff. DOI logo
Yoon, Hyung-Jo
2017. Textual voice elements and voice strength in EFL argumentative writing. Assessing Writing 32 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
2021. Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse. Reading and Writing 34:3 ► pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongyun & Diyun Sheng
2021. EFL Lecturers’ Metadiscourse in Chinese University MOOCs Across Course Types. Corpus Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.