Frequency effects in an L1 and L2 longitudinal corpus were investigated using Zipfian distribution analyses and linear curve estimations. The results demonstrated that the NS lexical input exhibited Zipfian distributions, but that the L2 lexical output did not match the NS Zipfian patterns. Word frequency analyses indicated that NS interlocutors modify their lexicon such that frequency scores decrease as a function of time that L2 learners have studied English. In contrast, the word frequency scores for the L2 output increased as a function of time. Post-hoc analyses indicated that differences in frequency scores between NS input and L2 output were best explained by the repetition of infrequent words, but not frequent words by L2 learners in the early stages of language acquisition. The results question absolute frequency interpretations of lexical acquisition for L2 learners and provide evidence for usage-based approaches for language learning.
Adjemian, C. 1983. “The transferability of lexical properties”. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Llearning. Rowley, MA: Newberry House, 250-268.
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L. 1995. The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. “The relationship of form and meaning: A cross sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language”. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13 (3), 253-278.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bell, H. 2003. Using Frequency Lists to Assess L2 texts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea.
Boyd, J.K. & Goldberg, A.E. 2009. “Input effects within a constructionist framework”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 418-429.
The British National Corpus. 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available at: [URL] (accessed October 2013).
Cobb, T. 2002. Web VocabProfiler. Available at: [URL] (accessed October 2013).
Cohen, J. 1992. “A power primer”. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 155–159.
Crossley, S.A., Salsbury, T. & McNamara, D.S. 2010. “The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers”. Language Learning, 60 (3), 573-605.
Crossley, S.A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D.S. & Jarvis, S. 2011. “What is lexical proficiency? Some answers from computational models of speech data”. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (1), 182-193.
Crossley, S.A., Salsbury, T. & McNamara, D.S. 2012. “Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices”. Language Testing, 29 (2), 240-260.
Ellis, N. 2002a. “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2) 143-188.
Ellis, N. 2002b. “Reflections on frequency effects in language acquisition: A response to commentaries”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 297-339.
Ellis, N. 2006b. “Language acquisition as rational contingency learning”. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 1-24.
Ellis, N.C. 2012. “What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use?” In S.T. Gries & D.S. Divjak (Eds.), Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing (Vol. 11).Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 7-34.
Ellis, N. & Collins, L. 2009. “Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function introduction to the Special Issue”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 329-335.
Ellis, N. & Ferreira-Junior, F. 2009. “Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution and function”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 370-385.
Gaies, S.J. 1983. “The investigation of language classroom processes”. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (2), 205-217.
Gass, S. & Mackey, A. 2002. “Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture?”Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 249-260.
Goldberg, A.E. (2003). “Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language”. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7 (5), 219-224.
Goldschneider, J.M. & DeKeyser, R. 2001. “Explaining the 'natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition' in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants”. Language Learning, 51 (1), 1–50.
Goodman, J., Dale, P., Li, P. 2008. “Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary”. Journal of Child Language, 351, 515-531.
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M. & Cai, Z. 2004. “Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language”. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36 (2), 193-202.
Gries, S.T. 2010. “Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations”. In S.T. Gries, S. Wulff & M. Davies (Eds.), Corpus Linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 197-212.
Hatch, E. 1983. Psycholinguistics: A Second Language Perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M. & Fearnow, S. 1999. “Testing the output hypothesis”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (3), 421-452.
Izumi, S. & Bigelow, M. 2000. “Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition”. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2), 239-278.
Laufer, B. 2000. “Task effect on instructed vocabulary learning: The hypothesis of involvement”. Selected papers from AILA ’99 Tokyo. Tokyo: Waseda University Press, 47-62.
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. 1995. “Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production”. Applied Linguistics, 16 (3), 307–322.
MacWhinney, B. 1997. “Second language acquisition and the Completion Model”. In A.M.B. de Groot & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 113-142.
McDonough, K. & Kim, Y. 2009. “Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of Wh-questions”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 386-398.
Mintz, T.H., Newport, E.L. & Bever, T.G. 2002. “The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children”. Cognitive Science, 26 (4), 393-424.
Pica, T. 1983. “Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (1), 69–79.
Robinson, P. & Ellis, N.C. 2008. A Handbook of Cognitive Llinguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.
Shockey, L. 2003. Sound Patterns of Spoken English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Singleton, D. 1999. Vocabulary Learning in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M. 1985. “Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development”. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235-253.
Swain, M. 1995. “Three functions of output in second language learning”. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
Toth, P.D. 2006. “Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition”. Language Learning, 56 (2), 319-385.
Wulff, S., Ellis, N., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K. & LeBlanc, C. 2009. “The acquisition of tense– aspect: Converging evidence from corpora, cognition, and learner constructions”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 354–369.
Zipf, G.K. (1935). The Psycho-biology of Language. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
2024. The development of phrase‐frames in EFL learners’ essays: Variability, structures, and functions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 1689 ff.
Kim, Hyunwoo & Eunseok Ro
2023. Additive extensive reading and syntactic development in second language writing: Analyses of syntactic complexity and sophistication in young EFL learners’ book reports. Journal of Second Language Writing 61 ► pp. 101040 ff.
HALL, JOAN KELLY
2022. L2 Classroom Input and L2 Positionally Sensitive Grammars: The Role of Information‐Seeking Question Sequences. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Hall, Joan Kelly
2022. L2 classroom interaction and its links to L2 learners’ developing L2 linguistic repertoires: A research agenda. Language Teaching 55:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
Harvey, Robin E. & Patricia J. Brooks
2022. Effects of text messaging using digital Pinyin input on literacy skills of elementary school Chinese immersion learners. Language Teaching Research
van de Weijer, Jeroen, Marjoleine Sloos & Weiyun Wei
Monteiro, Kátia R, Crossley, Scott A & Kyle, Kristopher
2020. In Search of New Benchmarks: Using L2 Lexical Frequency and Contextual Diversity Indices to Assess Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 280 ff.
Berger, Cynthia M, Scott A Crossley & Kristopher Kyle
2019. Using Native-Speaker Psycholinguistic Norms to Predict Lexical Proficiency and Development in Second-Language Production. Applied Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Crossley, Scott A. & Stephen Skalicky
2019. Examining lexical development in second language learners: An approximate replication of Salsbury, Crossley & McNamara (2011). Language Teaching 52:3 ► pp. 385 ff.
Crossley, Scott A., Stephen Skalicky, Kristopher Kyle & Katia Monteiro
2019. ABSOLUTE FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:04 ► pp. 721 ff.
Goss, Seth J & Katsuo Tamaoka
2019. Lexical accent perception in highly-proficient L2 Japanese learners: The roles of language-specific experience and domain-general resources. Second Language Research 35:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
Hashimoto, Brett J. & Jesse Egbert
2019. More Than Frequency? Exploring Predictors of Word Difficulty for Second Language Learners. Language Learning 69:4 ► pp. 839 ff.
CROSSLEY, SCOTT, KRISTOPHER KYLE & THOMAS SALSBURY
2016. A Usage‐Based Investigation of L2 Lexical Acquisition: The Role of Input and Output. The Modern Language Journal 100:3 ► pp. 702 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.