This study uses Multi-Dimensional analysis to describe linguistic variation in a corpus of published academic writing across three publication types in two disciplines. The resulting five dimensions were labeled: “Affective synthesis versus specialized information density”, “Definition and evaluation of new concepts”, “Author-centered stance”, “Reader-friendly narrative”, and “Abstract observation and description”. Factorial ANOVAs were used to test for significant interactions between publication type and discipline on each of the five linguistic dimensions. Statistical interactions were discovered for four of the five dimensions. The appropriate tests for statistical differences, either for main effects or simple effects, were performed, and publication type and discipline patterns were interpreted for all five dimensions. This paper highlights the importance of accounting for all of the independent factors in a corpus, using factorial ANOVAs where appropriate, in order to appropriately analyze and interpret patterns of linguistic variability.
(1994) Register: A review of empirical research. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register (pp. 351-385). Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
Biber, D
(1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243-257.
Biber, D
(2006a) Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116.
(2012) Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 9-37.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V
(2004) If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.
Biber, D., Egbert, J., Gray, B., Oppliger, R., & Szmrecsanyi, B
in press). Variation versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. In M. Kytö & P. Pahta (Eds.) Handbook of English historical linguistics Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
Biber, D., & Gray, B
(2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2-20.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S
(2014) Do more complex tasks facilitate greater grammatical complexity? An investigation of task type variation on the TOEFL iBT. Applied Linguistics, 1–31.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London, UK: Pearson Education.
Carkin, S
(2001) Pedagogic discourse in introductory classes: Multi-dimensional analysis of textbooks and lectures in biology and macroeconomics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Cloite, M., & Shinn, T
(1985) Expository practice: Social, cognitive and epistemological linkages. In T. Shinn & R. Whitley (Eds.), Expository Sience (pp. 31–60). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
Conrad, S
(1996a) Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in biology and history. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Conrad, S
(1996b) Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology. Linguistics and Education, 8(3), 299-326.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D
(Eds.) (2001) Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies. London, UK: Longman.
Csomay, E
(2007) A corpus-based look at linguistic variation in classroom interaction: Teacher talk versus student talk in American university classes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 336-355.
Davies, Mark
(2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available at [URL]
Davies, M. & Gardner, D
(2007) Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339-59.
Davies, M. & Gardner, D
(2013) A new Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 1-24.
Egbert, J
(2014) Reader perceptions of linguistic variation in published academic writing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Gorsuch, R.L
(1983) Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grabe, W
(1984) Towards defining expository prose within a theory of text construction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Gray, B
(2011) Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Gries, S. Th
(2006) Exploring variability within and between corpora: Some methodological considerations. Corpora, 1(2), 109-151.
Hyland, K
(2006) Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi, (Eds.), Academic Discourse across Disciplines (pp. 17-45). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
Hyland, K
(2008) Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41(4), 543-562.
Kuehl, R.O
(2000) Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
R Development Core Team
(2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Reference Index (Version 2.2.1). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Revelle, W
(2012) psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, WY: Northwestern University. Retrieved from [URL]
Simpson-Vlach, R. & Ellis, N
(2010) An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512.
2018. Do all roads lead to Rome?: Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Egbert, Jesse & Marianna Gracheva
2023. Linguistic variation within registers: granularity in textual units and situational parameters. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
2021. Visualizing international studies on cyberspace sovereignty: concept, rationality, and legitimacy. International Journal of Legal Discourse 6:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Bethany Gray
2016. Academic Writing Development at the University Level. Written Communication 33:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
Sun, Yuxiu & Le Cheng
2017. Linguistic variation and legal representation in legislative discourse: A corpus-based multi-dimensional study
. International Journal of Legal Discourse 2:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Wang, Jiawei & Zhiying Xin
2023. A novel multi-dimensional analysis of reply, response and rejoinder articles: When discipline meets time. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 65 ► pp. 101286 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.