Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (2015) ► pp.3053
Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N
(2003) Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H
(2001) Word Frequency Distributions. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belica, C
(1996) Analysis of temporal change in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 61–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D
(1990) Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(4), 257–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary & Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V
(2004)  If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R
(1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Structure and Use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., Cortes, V., Csomay, E., & Urzua, A
(2004) Representing Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D
(2013) Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the New General Service List. Applied Linguistics, 1(23). Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Carroll, J.B., Davies, P., & Richman, B
(1971) The American Heritage Word Frequency Book. . New York, NY: American Heritage.Google Scholar
The College Board
(2010) CLEP® Introductory Psychology: At a Glance. Retrieved from [URL]
Covington, M., & McFall, J
(2010) Cutting the Gordian knot: The moving-average type-token ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), 94–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A
(2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M
(2010) The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(4), 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M., & Gardner, D
(2010) A Frequency Dictionary of Contemporary American English. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Francis, W.N., & Kucera, H
(1979) Manual of Information to Accompany a Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for Use with Digital Computers. Department of Linguistics, Brown University, Providence, RI. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M
(2013) A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 1(24). Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th
(2006) Exploring variability within and between corpora: Some methodological considerations. Corpora, 1(2), 109–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heatley, A., & Nation, P
(1994) Range [Web-based tool]. Victoria University of Wellington, NZ. Available from [URL]
Hyland, K
(2008) Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P
(2007) Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 235–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juilland, A., & Chang-Rodríguez, E
(1964) Frequency Dictionary of Spanish Words. London, UK: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Leech, G
(1991) The state of the art in corpus linguistics. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 8–29). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
(2007) New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web (pp. 133–149). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A
(2001) Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Martínez, I., Beck, S., & Panza, C
(2009) Academic vocabulary in agricultural research articles: A corpus-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 183–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A
(2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A
(1996) Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y
(2006) Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Millar, N., & Budgell, B
(2008) The language of public health: A corpus-based analysis. Journal of Public Health, 16(5), 369–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, D
(2012) The Challenge of Constructing a Reliable Word List: An Exploratory Corpus-based Analysis of Introductory Psychology textbooks. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Nation, I.S.P
(2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, I.S.P., & Webb, S
(2011) Researching and Analyzing Vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar
Nation, I.S.P., & Waring, R
(1997) Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 6–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R. & Ellis, N
(2010) An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N
(2010) Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, D.L., & Lorge, I
(1944) The Teacher’s Word Book of 30,000 Words. New York, NY: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Tuldava, J
(1995) On the relation between text length and vocabulary size. In J. Tuldava (Ed.), Methods in Quantitative Linguistics (pp. 131–149). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier (WVT).Google Scholar
Tweedie, F., & Baayen, H
(1998) How variable may a constant be? Measures of lexical richness in perspective. Computers and the Humanities, 32(1), 323–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Liang, S., & Ge, G
(2008) Establishment of a medical academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, 27(4), 442–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, J
(2009) A basic engineering English word list for less proficient foundation engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 170–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xue, G., & Nation, I.S.P
(1984) A university word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3(2), 215–229.Google Scholar
Yule, G.U
(1944) The Statistical Study of LiteraryVocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 30 other publications

Beliaeva, Tatiana Rafaelovna
2021. Frequency and distribution of the units of general scientific (academic) lexicon as the markers of disciplinary affiliation of a discourse. Litera :6  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Bentum, Martijn, Louis ten Bosch, Antal van den Bosch & Mirjam Ernestus
2019. Do speech registers differ in the predictability of words?. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Bruce, Tayyiba
2018. New technologies, continuing ideologies: Online reader comments as a support for media perspectives of minority religions. Discourse, Context & Media 24  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Conrad, Susan
2019. Register in English for Academic Purposes and English for Specific Purposes. Register Studies 1:1  pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
Coxhead, Averil, Emma McLaughlin & Aleeshea Reid
2019. The development and application of a specialised word list: the case of Fabrication. Journal of Vocational Education & Training 71:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Luobing, Qiumin Guo, Weili Wu & Meghana N. Satpute
2020. A semantic relatedness preserved subset extraction method for language corpora based on pseudo-Boolean optimization. Theoretical Computer Science 836  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Drayton, Jenny & Averil Coxhead
2023. The development, evaluation and application of an aviation radiotelephony specialised technical vocabulary list. English for Specific Purposes 69  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Green, Clarence & James Lambert
2018. Advancing disciplinary literacy through English for academic purposes: Discipline-specific wordlists, collocations and word families for eight secondary subjects. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 35  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Jakobsen, Anne Sofie, Averil Coxhead & Birgit Henriksen
2018. General and academic high frequency vocabulary in Danish. Nordand 13:1  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Kamrotov, Mikhail, Ekaterina Talalakina & Denis Stukal
2022. Technical vocabulary in languages for special purposes: The corpus-based Russian economics word list. Lingua 273  pp. 103326 ff. DOI logo
Karlińska, Agnieszka
2020. (Nie)przekładalność języków. Analiza korpusowa opinii sądowo-psychiatrycznych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 16:4  pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Karlińska, Agnieszka
2021. Textual strategies of forensic psychiatrists. A corpus-based analysis of how the language of psychiatry is reconciled with the language of law in polish forensic psychiatric opinions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 74  pp. 101652 ff. DOI logo
Liang, Linxin & Mingwu Xu
2019. An exploratory study of Chinese words and phrases. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:1  pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Michell, Colin
2022. Using Corpus Linguistics to Better Prepare Students for the IELTS Reading Exam. In English Language and General Studies Education in the United Arab Emirates [English Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Pedagogy, ],  pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Don
2020. Analysing Frequency Lists. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Don
2022. Replication as a means of assessing corpus representativeness and the generalizability of specialized word lists. Applied Corpus Linguistics 2:3  pp. 100027 ff. DOI logo
Naismith, Ben, Alan Juffs, Na-Rae Han & Daniel Zheng
2022. Handle it in-house?. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27:3  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Thi My Hang & Averil Coxhead
2023. Evaluating multiword unit word lists for academic purposes. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 174:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Pan, Fan
2020. Methodological differences matter: Identification thresholds and corpus composition in lexical bundle research. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38:4  pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
Pan, Fan, Randi Reppen & Douglas Biber
2016. Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 21  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Pan, Fan, Randi Reppen & Douglas Biber
2020. Methodological issues in contrastive lexical bundle research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:2  pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Parodi, Giovanni
2015. Variation across university genres in seven disciplines. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:4  pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Pinchbeck, Geoffrey G., Dale Brown, Stuart Mclean & Brandon Kramer
2022. Validating word lists that represent learner knowledge in EFL contexts: The impact of the definition of word and the choice of source corpora. System 106  pp. 102771 ff. DOI logo
Schmitt, Norbert & Diane Schmitt
2020. Vocabulary in Language Teaching, DOI logo
Szudarski, Paweł
2023. Collocations, Corpora and Language Learning, DOI logo
2020. Developing and Validating an Academic Vocabulary List in Russian: A Computational Approach. The Modern Language Journal 104:3  pp. 618 ff. DOI logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019. Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner, DOI logo
Wolfer, Sascha, Alexander Koplenig, Marc Kupietz & Carolin Müller-Spitzer
2023. Introducing DeReKoGram: A Novel Frequency Dataset with Lemma and Part-of-Speech Information for German. Data 8:11  pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
2017. Analysing Lexical Diversity and Lexical Density in Korean Texts. Language Facts and Perspectives 41:null  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.