Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 20:4 (2015) ► pp.421–444

The Zhuangzi, hermeneutics and (philological) corpus linguistics

 | University of Birmingham
The classical Chinese text Zhuangzi tells us that the meaning of a word, or a text, is not fixed, but consists of the many perspectives offered in debate. Each new contribution interprets what has been said and thus adds to its meaning. This is akin to the approach of modern hermeneutics. What a text means is determined by its intertextual links to previous texts, and by the traces it leaves in its subsequent interpretations. The practical approach of philology and the methodology of corpus linguistics provide the foundation of the task of interpretation, by establishing the textual evidence on which interpretation has to rest. My paper exemplifies the Zhuangzi’s strategy in moving on from the textual evidence to their manifold interpretations, thus interweaving corpus linguistics, philology and hermeneutics.
Keywords: Zhuangzi, meaning, interpretation, hermeneutics, philology
Published online: 21 January 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.4.01teu
References (41)
Berkson, M. (1996). Language: The guest of reality – Zhuangzi and Derrida on language, reality, and skillfulness. In P. Kjellberg & P.J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi (pp. 97–126). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burik, S. (2010). Thinking on the edge: Heidegger, Derrida, and the Daoist Gateway (men 門). Philosophy East and West, 60(4), 499–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. (2014). Considering Asia and teaching the Daoist way: Understanding identity, community, and ecology in connection, perspective, and practice. In D. Jones & M. Marion (Eds.), The Dynamics of Cultural Counterpoint in Asian Studies (pp. 127–140). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ch’ine, E.T. (1984). The conception of language and the use of paradox in Buddhism and Taoism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 11(4), 375–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Froese, K. (2013). Humour as the playful sidekick to language in the Zhuangzi. Asian Philosophy, 23(2), 137–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method (2nd ed.). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Goh, I. (2011). Chuang Tzu’s becoming-animal. Philosophy East and West, 61(1), 110–133.Google Scholar
Hansen, C. (1992). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermanns, F. (2003). Linguistische Hermeneutik. In A. Linke, H.-P. Ortner & P.R. Portmann-Tzelikas (Eds.), Sprache und mehr: Ansichten einer Linguistik der sprachlichen Praxis (pp. 125–163). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, R. (2010). Getting It Right with Tao: A Contemporary Spin on the Tao Te Ching. New York, NY: Channel V Books.Google Scholar
Keenan, J.P. (1993). Mahāyāna theology: A dialogue with critics. Buddhist-Christian Studies, 131, 15–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Lau, D.C. (1963). Dao de Jing of Laozi. Translation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Legge, J. (1891). The Texts of Taoism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1971). Confucian Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine of the Mean. Chatham, MA: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Mair, V.H. (1998). Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu (2nd ed.). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G.H. (1967). Mind, Self, and Society: From The Standpoint Of A Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, E.S. (2008). Questioning dao: Skepticism, mysticism, and ethics in the Zhuangzi. The International Journal of the Asian Philosophical Association, 11, 5–19.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. (2006). The Book of Zhuangzi. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Schrift, A.D. (1990). Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. (1996). Zhuangzi’s attitude towards language and his skepticism. In P. Kjellberg & P.J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi (pp. 68–96). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Smith, T.L. (2008). The Language of Paradox and Poetics: A Comparative Study of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oxford, OH: Miami University.Google Scholar
Stevenson, F.W. (2006). Zhuangzi’s dao as background noise. Philosophy East and West, 56(2), 301–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Z. (2015). Language, Discourse, and Praxis in Ancient China. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K. (2004). The limit of language in Daoism. Asian Philosophy, 14(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
Tang, Y. (1999). Language, truth, and literary interpretation: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of the History of Ideas, 60(1), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teubert, W. (2003). Writing, hermeneutics, and corpus linguistics. Logos and Language, 4(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
. (2010a). Translation equivalence and interpretive corpus linguistics: The case of ‘孝’[xiao], translated as filial piety . In F. Čermák, P. Corness & A. Klégr (Eds.), InterCorp: Exploring a Multilingual Corpus (pp. 31–53). Praha, Czech Republic: Lidové Noviny Nakladatelstvi.Google Scholar
. (2010b). Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Was there a cat in the garden? Knowledge between discourse and the monadic self. Language and Dialogue, 3(2), 273–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (forthcoming). Widening the remit.
Thompson, K.O. (1995). When a “white horse” is not a “horse”. Philosophy East and West, 45(4), 481–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vişan, F. (2001). Zhuangzi’s point of view about language. The Romanian Journal of Chinese Studies, 1(1). Retrieved from [URL] (last access October 2015).Google Scholar
Vrubliauskaitė, A. (2014). Language in Zhuangzi: How to say without saying? International Journal of Area Studies, 9(1), 75–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2003). Linguistic Strategies in Daoist and Chan Buddhism. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, B. (1968). The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
York, B. (2014). Practical Skepticism: Sextus Empiricus and Zhuangzi. (Unpublished MA dissertation). Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Ziporyn, B. (2009). Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Zhu (朱彦臻), Yanzhen
2023. Rethinking Ignorance Through Confucianism and Daoism: Propriety, Transcendence, and Their Educational Implications. ECNU Review of Education DOI logo
Liang, Linxin & Mingwu Xu
2019. An exploratory study of Chinese words and phrases. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Teubert, Wolfgang
2018. Dialogue and what it means for discourse. Language and Dialogue 8:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.