Subjective definitions of spirituality and religion
An exploratory study in Germany and the US
This paper shows how corpus methods can be usefully employed in the field of psychology of religion in triangulation with other empirical instruments. Current international surveys mirror an on-going transformation in subjective meanings in religious discourse cumulating in the question: what do people actually mean when they describe themselves as spiritual, religious or neither? The paper presents results of a cross-cultural study with 1,886 participants in the US and Germany. The thematic goal is to explore subjective understandings by examining personal definitions of religion and spirituality. Methodologically, the study shows how the key word procedure can be used to compare the semantic profile of subjective concepts between different languages and cultures by contrasting them to standard language and by using socio-biographical context variables to build contrasting sub-corpora. To control the in-equivalence of existing reference corpora in terms of size and design a so-called reference control corpus (RCC) is introduced.
Keywords: semantics, key words, mixed-method approach, cross-cultural comparison, discourse analysis
Published online: 21 January 2016
Cited by 9 other publications
Altmeyer, Stefan & Daniel Dreesmann
Altmeyer, Stefan & Constantin Klein
Demmrich, Sarah & Stefan Huber
Fraedrich, John, Othman Althawadi & Ramin Bagherzadeh
Huber, Stefan, Mathias Tanner & Herbert Scheiblich
Mahlberg, Michaela, Peter Stockwell, Johan de Joode, Catherine Smith & Matthew Brook O'Donnell
Schrauf, Robert W.
Streib, Heinz, Constantin Klein, Barbara Keller & Ralph Hood
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
(2007) Preface. In B.A. Kosmin & A. Keysar (Eds.), Secularism and Secularity: Contemporary International Perspectives Institute for the Study of Secularism in the Society and Culture (ISSSC) (pp. iii–iv). Retrieved from http://prog.trincoll.edu/ISSSC/Book/Chapters.asp (last accessed July 2013).
Gilquin, G., & Gries, S. Th
Greenwald, D.F., & Harder, D.W.
Gries, S. Th
Heelas, P., Woodhead, L., Seel, B., Szerszynski, B., & Trusting, K.
Houtman, D., & Aupers, S.
Keller, B., Klein, C., Swhajor-Biesemann, A., Silver, C.F., Hood, R.W., & Streib, H.
Keller, B., Streib, H., Silver, C.F., Klein, C., & Hood, R.W.
LaCour, P., Ausker, N.H., & Hvidt, N.C.
O’Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M.
Paquot, M., & Bestgen, Y.
Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., & Niederhoffer, K.G.
Schlehofer, M.M., Omoto, A.M., & Adelman, J.R.
Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
Streib, H., & Hood, R.W.
Streib, H., Hood, R.W., Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Silver, C.
Tausczik, Y.R., & Pennebaker, J.W.
Teubert, W., & Čermáková, A.