Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 27:3 (2022) ► pp. 259290
References
Algeo, J.
(2006) British or American English?: A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N.
(2010) More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62 (1), 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (Version 1.4) [Computer software]. http://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/package​=lme4
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M., Croft, W., Ellis, N., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T.
(2009) Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentivoglio, P., & Sedano, M.
(2011) Morphosyntactic variation in Spanish–speaking Latin America. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics (pp. 123–147). Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beuls, K., & Steels, L.
(2013) Agent-based models of strategies for the emergence and evolution of grammatical agreement. PLoS ONE, 8 (3), e58960. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloem, J., Versloot, A., & Weerman, F.
(2015) An agent-based model of a historical word order change. In R. Berwick, A. Korhonen, A. Lenci, T. Poibeau, & A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 22–27). Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, R., & Croft, W.
(2012) S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language, 88 (2), 269–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, H.
(2013) Syntax of Dutch: Adjectives and Adjective Phrases. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claes, J.
(2015) Competing constructions: The pluralization of presentational haber in Dominican Spanish. Cognitive Linguistics, 26 (1), 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colleman, T.
(2009) Verb disposition in argument structure alternations: A corpus study of the dative alternation in Dutch. Language Sciences, 31 (5), 593–611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2014) Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics, 25 (4), 617–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daems, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D.
(2015) Wat dragen we vandaag: een hemd met blazer of een shirt met jasje? [What do we wear today: A ‘hemd’ with a ‘blazer’ or a ‘shirt’ with a ‘jasje’?] Taal En Tongval, 67 (2), 307–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2004) British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Retrieved January, 2020, from https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/bnc/
(2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved January, 2020, from https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coca/
De Vylder, B.
(2007) The Evolution of Conventions in Multi-agent Systems [Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel]. https://​langev​.com​/pdf​/deVylder07evoltionOfConventionsPHD​.pdf
Diessel, H.
(2015) Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 296–322). De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dürscheid, C., Elspaß, S. & Ziegler, A.
(Eds.) (2018) Variantengrammatik des Standarddeutschen. Ein Online-Nachschlagewerk [Variant grammar of Standard German. An online reference work]. http://​mediawiki​.ids​-mannheim​.de​/VarGra​/index​.php​/Substantive​_auf​_-ation_​/_​-ung
Fagyal, Z., Swarup, S., Escobar, A. M., Gasser, L., & Lakkaraju, K.
(2010) Centers and peripheries: Network roles in language change. Lingua, 120 (8), 2061–2079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Friendly, M., Hong, J., Andersen, R., Firth, D., & Taylor, S.
(2016) Effect Displays for Linear, Generalized Linear, and Other Models (Version 3.2) [Computer software]. https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/effects/
Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Speelman, D.
(1999) Convergentie en divergentie in de Nederlandse woordenschat: een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen [Convergence and divergence in Dutch vocabulary: A study into clothing and football terminology]. P. J. Meertens-Instituut.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., & Hill, J.
(2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N.
(2008) Agent-based Models. Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, W.
(2013) Belgian Dutch. In F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Language and Space: Dutch (pp. 700–720). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M.
(1997) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst [General Dutch Grammer]. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Harrell, F. J.
(2017) Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous (Version 4.0-3) [Computer software]. https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/package​=Hmisc
Hay, J.
(2018) Sociophonetics: The role of words, the role of context, and the role of words in context. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10 (4), 696–706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, J., Walker, A., Sanchez, K., & Thompson, K.
(2019) Abstract social categories facilitate access to socially skewed words. PLoS ONE, 14 (2), e0210793. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M., & Flach, S.
forthcoming). A case of constructional contamination in English: Modified noun phrases influence adverb placement in the passive. In M. Grygiel Ed. Contrast and Analogy in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics John Benjamins
Höder, S.
(2014) Constructing diasystems: Grammatical organisation in bilingual groups. In T. Åfarli & B. Mæhlum (Eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Grammar (pp. 137–152). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Grammar is community-specific: Background and basic concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar. In H. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in Contact Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 37–70). Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, H., Steels, L., Baronchelli, A., Briscoe, T., Christiansen, M., Griffiths, T., Jäger, G., Kirby, S., Komarova, N., Peter, R., & Jochen, T.
(2009) What can mathematical, computational, and robotic models tell us about the origins of syntax? In Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax. The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karjus, A., & Ehala, M.
(2018) Testing an agent-based model of language choice on sociolinguistic survey data. Language Dynamics and Change, 8 (2), 219–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landsbergen, F.
(2009) Cultural Evolutionary Modeling of Patterns in Language Change: Exercises in Evolutionary Linguistics. LOT.Google Scholar
Landsbergen, F., Lachlan, R., ten Cate, C., & Verhagen, A.
(2010) A cultural evolutionary model of patterns in semantic change. Linguistics, 48 (2), 363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N.
(2015) How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D., Zeileis, A., & Hornik, K.
(2020) vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data (Version 1.4-6) [Computer software]. https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/vcd​/index​.html
Oostdijk, N., Goedertier, W., Van Eynde, F., Boves, L., Martens, J.-P., Moortgat, M., & Baayen, H.
(2002) Experiences from the Spoken Dutch corpus project. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 340–347.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, N., Reynaert, M., Hoste, V., & Schuurman, I.
(2013b) The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch. In P. Spyns & J. Odijk (Eds.), Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch, Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing (pp. 219–247). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perek, F., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2015) Generalizing beyond the input: The functions of the constructions matter. Journal of Memory and Language, 84 1, 108–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Martín, A. M.
(2007) Pluralización de había en el habla de El Hierro: Datos cuantitativos [Pluralization of había in the speech of El Hierro: Quantitative data]. Revista de Filología de La Universidad de La Laguna, 25 1, 505–513.Google Scholar
Phan, D., & Varenne, F.
(2010) Agent-based models and simulations in economics and social sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13 (4), 1532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pijpops, D.
(2019) How, Why and Where Does Argument Structure Vary? A Usage-Based Investigation into the Dutch Transitive-Prepositional Alternation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven]. LIRIAS @ KU Leuven. https://​lirias​.kuleuven​.be​/2815151
Pijpops, D., & Beuls, K.
(2015) Agent-gebaseerde modellering in de historische taalkunde. Een model van regularisatiedruk op de Nederlandse werkwoorden [Agent-based modelling in historical linguistics: A model of the regularization pressure on Dutch verbs]. Handelingen Der Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij Voor Taal- En Letterkunde En Geschiedenis, 69 1, 5–23.Google Scholar
Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F.
(2015) The rise of the verbal weak inflection in Germanic: An agent-based model. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 5 1, 81–102.Google Scholar
Pijpops, D., De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F.
(2018) Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax: Four case studies. Constructions and Frames, 10 (2), 269–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F.
(2015) Ethnolect speakers and Dutch partitive adjectival inflection: A corpus analysis. Taal En Tongval, 67 (2), 343–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica, 50 (2), 543–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) A multivariate analysis of the partitive genitive in Dutch: Bringing quantitative data into a theoretical discussion. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14 (1), 99–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plevoets, K.
(2008) Tussen spreek- en standaardtaal. Een corpusgebaseerd onderzoek naar de situationele, regionale en sociale verspreiding van enkele morfosyntactische verschijnselen uit het gesproken Belgisch-Nederlands [Between language for speaking and standard language. A corpus-based study to the situational, regional and social diffusion of a number of morphosyntactic features of spoken Belgian Dutch] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven]. LIRIAS @ KU Leuven. https://​lirias​.kuleuven​.be​/1821028
Ruette, T.
(2012) Aggregating Lexical Variation: Towards Large-scale Lexical Lectometry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven]. LIRIAS @ KU Leuven. https://​lirias​.kuleuven​.be​/1821265
Ruette, T., Ehret, K., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
(2016) A lectometric analysis of aggregated lexical variation in written Standard English with Semantic Vector Space models. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21 (1), 48–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sonderegger, M., Wagner, M., & Torreira, F.
(2018) Quantitative Methods for Linguistic Data. http://​people​.linguistics​.mcgill​.ca​/~morgan​/book/
Speelman, Dirk
(2014) Logistic regression: A confirmatory technique for comparisons in corpus linguistics. In D. Glynn & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy (pp. 487–533). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speelman, D., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D.
(2018) Mixed-Effects Regression Models in Linguistics. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steels, L.
(2011) Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews, 8 (4), 339–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Language as a complex adaptive system. In M. Schoenauer, K. Deb, G. Rudolph, X. Yao, E. Lutton, J. J. Merelo, & H.-P. Schwefel (Eds.), Proceedings of PPSN VI: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 17–26). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R. H.
(2010) Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication (pp. 151–173). Continuum.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61 (2), 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Agtmaal-Wobma, E., Harmsen, C., Dal, L., & Poulain, M.
(2007) Belgen in Nederland en Nederlanders in België [Belgians in the Netherlands and Dutchmen in Belgium]. Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek (CBS). https://​www​.cbs​.nl​/-​/media​/imported​/documents​/2008​/02​/2007​-k4​-b15​-p47​-art​.pdf
van den Toorn, M. C.
(1977) Nederlandse Grammatica [Dutch Grammar] (5th ed.). Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
van der Horst, J.
(2008) Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis [History of Dutch syntax]. Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
van Eerten, L.
(2007) Over het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands [About the Corpus of Spoken Dutch]. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 12 (3), 194–215.Google Scholar
Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L.
(2009) Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace.Google Scholar
van Trijp, R., & Steels, L.
(2012) Multilevel alignment maintains language systematicity. Advances in Complex Systems, 15 (3–4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, P.
(2012) Adaptive Strategies in the Emergence of Lexical Systems. Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Wieling, M., & Nerbonne, J.
(2015) Advances in dialectometry. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1 1, 243–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar