Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 21:1 (2016) ► pp.28–47

What trajectors reveal about TIME metaphors

Analysis of English and Swedish

| Umeå University

This paper is an analysis of trajectors (i.e. located entities) in language about fixed durations of TIME. More specifically, trajectors in instances including the English prepositions in or on, or their Swedish equivalents i or på, are analyzed. On the structure of the inverse Moving Observer/Moving Time metaphors (Lakoff & Johnson 1999) instances such as these should be construed relative to a Moving Observer, and trajectors people that move relative to fixed durations of TIME (as reflected in e.g. when we come to launching the 4th edition in early 1990). My analysis, however, suggests that our understanding of TIME through SPACE is more nuanced than suggested by these metaphors. In this specific context, trajectors are not typically people in motion, but rather events or processes located in, or on, unit of time landmarks. My study emphasizes the need to test the systematicity of the mappings proposed by Conceptual Metaphor Theory.

Keywords: Conceptual Metaphor Theory, SPACE, TIME, MOTION, trajectors
Published online: 31 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.1.02fal
References
Allén, S
(2009) Svensk ordbok utgiven av Svenska Akademien. Stockholm, Sweden: Nordstedt.Google Scholar
Barnhart, R.K
(1988) The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology. New York, NY: The H.W. Wilson Company.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M
(2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L
(2008) Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H., H
(1973) Space, time, semantics and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Demmen, J., Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Koller, V., Hardie, A., & Payne, S
(2015) A computer-assisted study of the use of Violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 205–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A
(1999) Metaphorical polysemy and paradigmatic relations: A corpus study. Word 50(3), 319–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V
(2004) The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning, and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Jaszczolt, K.M
(Eds.) (2012a) Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Linguistic Diversity. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logox>Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2012b) Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture, and Cognition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W
(2007) Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M.J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 2–18). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a) Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Multiple constraints in theories of metaphor. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 575–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J
(1998) The ‘conduit’ metaphor revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for communication. In Koenig, J.-P. (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (pp. 205–218). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, L.A
(Ed.) (2013) Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson Falck, M
(2010) Are metaphorical paths and roads ever paved? Corpus analysis of real and imagined journeys. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 93–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012a) From perception of spatial artefacts to metaphorical meaning. In L. Filipovic & K.M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and Time across Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture and Cognition (pp. 329–349). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Metaphor variation across L1 and L2 speakers of English: Do differences at the level of linguistic metaphor matter? In F. MacArthur, J.L. Oncins-Martinez, A.M. Piquer-Piriz & M. Sánchez-Garcia (Eds.), Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture, and Communication (pp. 109–134). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Narrow paths, difficult roads, and long ways: Travel through space and metaphorical meaning. In C. Paradis, J. Hudson & U. Magnusson (Eds.), The Construal of Spatial Meaning: Windows into Conceptual Space (pp. 214–235). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson Falck, M. & Gibbs, R.W
(2012) Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 251–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2005) Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R
(2002) Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M
(2005) English General Nouns: A Corpus Theoretical Approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T., Holmes, K.J., Srinivasan, M., & Ramscar, M
(2011) Even abstract motion influences the understanding of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(4), 260–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, K.E
(2000) Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Woolf: Point of view, conceptual mapping and linguistic practice. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Núñez, R.E
(1999) Could the future taste purple? In R.E. Núñez & W. Freeman. (Eds.), Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention, and Emotion (pp. 41–60). Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Núñez, R.E., & Sweetser, E
(2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R.E., Motz, B.A., & Teusher, U
(2009) Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(3), 133–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G
(2003) The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In N. Baumgarten, C. Böttger, M. Motz & J. Probst (Eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung - das Leben mit Mehreren Sprachen. Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 8(2/3), 226–239.Google Scholar
Reddy, M.J
(1993) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 164–201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sardinha, T.B
(2012) An assessment of metaphor retrieval methods. In F. MacArthur, J.L. Oncins-Martinez, A.M. Piquer-Piriz & M. Sánchez-Garcia (Eds.), Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture, and Communication (pp. 21–50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E
(2006) A corpus-based study of metaphors for speech activity in British English. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.) (2006) Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 36–62). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A
(2006a) Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.) (2006) Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 1–16). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S.T. Gries (Eds.) (2006) Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 63–105). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & S. Th. Gries
(Eds.) (2006) Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallington, A
(2012) Back to the future: Just where are forthcoming events located? In L. Filipovic & K.M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and Time in Languages and Cultures II: Language, Culture, and Cognition (pp. 83–99). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Johansson Falck, Marlene
2014. Temporal prepositions explained. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:2 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Johansson Falck, Marlene
2017. Chapter 2. Embodied motivations for abstract in and on constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Vesić Pavlović, Tijana
2018. The role of path metaphors in conceptualising life in English and Serbian: a corpus-based analysis. Brno studies in English :1 ► pp. [63] ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Guorong & Yi Sun
2023. A bibliometric study of metaphor research and its implications (2010–2020). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:3 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Motion Metaphors in Music Criticism [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 10], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.