Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 21:2 (2016) ► pp. 192218
References

References

Bernaisch, T., Gries, St. Th., & Mukherjee, J.
(2014) The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide, 35(1), 7–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, K.
(2008) Varieties of World Englishes. In B.B. Kachru, Y. Kachru & C.L. Nelson (Eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 289–312). Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., Cueni A, Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R.H.
(2007) Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bourne, I. Kraemer & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Burnham, K.P., & Anderson, D.R.
(2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Collins, P.
(1995) The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics, 33(1), 35–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, H., Frauke D., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
(2014) Variability in verb complemention in late modern English: Finite vs. non-finite patterns. In M. Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English Syntax (pp. 182–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H.
(2013) Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deshors, S.C.
(2014a) Towards an identification of prototypical non-native modal constructions in EFL: A corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 19–50.Google Scholar
(2014b) A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach. English World Wide, 35(3), 279–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) A constructionist approach to gerundial and infinitival verb-complementation patterns in native and Hong Kong English varieties. English Text Construction, 8(2), 207–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D.S., & Arppe, A.
(2013) Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 221–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffley, P.
(1999) The use of the infinitive and the -ing after verbs denoting the beginning, middle and end of an event. Folio Linguistica, 23(3), 295–331.Google Scholar
Edwards, A.
(2014) The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes, 33(2), 173–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, G.M.
(1974) Semantic and Syntactic Irregularity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S.
(Ed.) (1996) Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th
(2003) Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
(2015a) Quantitative linguistics. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 725–732). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) The role of quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus and experimental data on (relative) frequency and contingency of words and constructions. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Change of Paradigms - New Paradoxes: Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics (pp. 311–325). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Adelman, A.S.
(2014) Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms (pp. 35–54). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Bernaisch, T.
(2016) Exploring epicenters empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide, 37(1), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Deshors, S.C.
(2014) Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora, 9(1), 109–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 130–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Wulff, S.
(2013) The genitive alternation in Chinese and German ESL learners: Towards a multifactorial notion of context in learner corpus research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(3), 327–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T.
(2014) The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. In S. Buschfeld, T. Hoffmann, M. Huber & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond (pp. 160–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaleta, A.
(2012) The English gerund vs. the to-infinitive: The case of aspectual constructions. Selected papers from UK-CLA Meetings . Retrieved from http://​www​.uk​-cla​.org​.uk​/files​/proceedings​/Kaleta​.pdf (last accessed June 2014).
Khamis, A.
(2015, July). Cross-varietal variation in English verb complementation: A multivariate corpus analysis. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference 2015 , Newcastle upon Tyne.
Koch, C.
(2015) Routines in lexis and grammar: A ‘gravity’ approach within the International Corpus of English. Paper presented at the ICAME 36 conference , Universität Trier, 27-29 May 2015.
Kuperman, V., & Bresnan, J.
(2012) The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 588–611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1991) Cognitive Grammar 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liaw, A., & Wiener, M.
(2015) randomForest. Version 4.6-12. A package for R. Retrieved from https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/randomForest​/index​.html (last accessed February 2016).
Mair, C.
(2002) Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 105–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The world system of English. English World-Wide, 34(3), 253–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-García, M.T., & Wulff, S.
(2012) Not wrong, yet not quite right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 225–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsuki, K., Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J.A.
(2016) The Random Forests statistical technique: An examination of its value for the study of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(1), 20–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mindt, D.
(2000) An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J., & Gries, St. Th
(2009) Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide, 30(1), 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J., & Hoffmann, S.
(2006) Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide, 27(2), 147–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J., & Schilk, M.
(2008) Verb-complementational profiles across varieties of English: Comparing verb classes in Indian English and British English. In T. Nevalainen, I Taavitsainen, P. Pahta & M. Korhonen (Eds.), The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present (pp. 163–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, C., Mukherjee, S., Schilk, M., & Mukherjee, J.
(2013) Statistical analysis of varieties of English. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176(3), 777–793. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noël, D.
(2003) Is there semantics in all syntax? The case of accusative and infinitive constructions vs. that-clauses. In G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Vol.2, Complex Constructions (pp. 52–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, M.
(1985) Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 2. Complex Constructions (pp. 42–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olavarría de Ersson, E., & Shaw, P.
(2003)) Verb complementation patterns in Indian standard English. English World-Wide, 24(2), 137–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
2012R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://​R​-project​.org (last accessed July 2012)
Ransom, E.
(1979) Definiteness and animacy constraints on passives and double object constructions in English. Glossa, 13(2), 215–240.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G.
(1995) On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies, 76(4), 367–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilk, M., Bernaisch, T., & Mukherjee, J.
(2012) Mapping unity and diversity in South Asian English lexicogrammar. In M. Hundt & U. Gut (Eds.), Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes (pp. 137–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilk, M., Mukherjee, J., Nam, C., & Mukherjee, S.
(2013) Complementation of ditransitive verbs in south Asian Englishes: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(2), 187–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shastri, S.V.
(1996) Using computer corpora in the description of language with special reference to complementation in Indian English. In R.J. Baumgardner (Ed.), South Asian English: Structure, Use, and Users (pp. 70–81). Urbana & Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, E.
(2007) Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.B., & Escobedo, J.
(2002) The semantics of to-infinitival vs. -ing verb complement constructions in English. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston & S. Neuvel (Eds.), Proceedings from the Main Session in the Chicago Linguistics Society’s Thirty-Seventh Meeting (pp. 549–564). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., & Kortmann, B.
(2011) Typological profiling: Learner Englishes versus L2 varieties of English. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap (pp. 167–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z.
(1957) Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy, 66(2). 143–160.Google Scholar
Vosberg, U.
(2003) The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in modern English. In G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English (pp. 329–345). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1988) The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., & Gries, St. Th
(2015) Prenominal adjective order preferences in Chinese and German L2 English: A multifactorial corpus study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(1), 122–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 27 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], Crossref logo
Béchet, Christophe
2020. An empirical perspective on the contact between English and French: a case study on substitutive complex prepositions. Linguistics Vanguard 6:s2 Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes. English Text Construction 10:1  pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3  pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2018. Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2018.  In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Mandative subjunctive versus should in world Englishes: a new take on an old alternation. Corpora 15:2  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Sandra Götz
2020. Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Egbert, Jesse & Luke Plonsky
2020.  In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,  pp. 593 ff. Crossref logo
García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3  pp. 411 ff. Crossref logo
Gardner, Matt Hunt, Eva Uffing, Nicholas Van Vaeck, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Stefan Th. Gries
2021. Variation isn’t that hard: Morphosyntactic choice does not predict production difficulty. PLOS ONE 16:6  pp. e0252602 ff. Crossref logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2018.  In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Grafmiller, Jason & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2018. Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change 30:3  pp. 385 ff. Crossref logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2017. Syntactic alternation research. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31  pp. 8 ff. Crossref logo
Gries, Stefan Th., Santa Barbara, Justus Liebig & Sandra C. Deshors
2020. There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies. ICAME Journal 44:1  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Gries, Stefan Th., Tobias Bernaisch & Benedikt Heller
2018.  In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Heller, Benedikt, Tobias Bernaisch & Stefan Th. Gries
2017. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41:1  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019.  In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019.  In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English,  pp. 105 ff. Crossref logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019.  In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English,  pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Kruger, Haidee & Gert De Sutter
2018. Alternations in contact and non-contact varieties. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo
Lee,Yong-hun & 유지희
2017. A Random Forest Analysis of Can and May in Korean EFL Learners’ Writings. English Language and Linguistics 23:3  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Lester, Nicholas A.
2019.  That’s hard. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
MERILÄINEN, LEA
2017. The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes 36:4  pp. 760 ff. Crossref logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8  pp. 1151 ff. Crossref logo
Shadrova, Anna, Pia Linscheid, Julia Lukassek, Anke Lüdeling & Sarah Schneider
2021. A Challenge for Contrastive L1/L2 Corpus Studies: Large Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation Across Morphological, but Not Global Syntactic Categories in Task-Based Corpus Data of a Homogeneous L1 German Group. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.