Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 21:2 (2016) ► pp.192218
References
Bernaisch, T., Gries, St. Th., & Mukherjee, J
Bolton, K
(2008) Varieties of World Englishes. In B.B. Kachru, Y. Kachru & C.L. Nelson (Eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 289–312). Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., Cueni A, Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R.H
(2007) Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bourne, I. Kraemer & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Burnham, K.P., & Anderson, D.R
(2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Collins, P
(1995) The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics, 33(1), 35–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, H., Frauke D., & Szmrecsanyi, B
(2014) Variability in verb complemention in late modern English: Finite vs. non-finite patterns. In M. Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English Syntax (pp. 182–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H
(2013) Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deshors, S.C
(2014a) Towards an identification of prototypical non-native modal constructions in EFL: A corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 19–50.Google Scholar
(2014b) A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach. English World Wide, 35(3), 279–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D.S., & Arppe, A
(2013) Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 221–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffley, P
(1999) The use of the infinitive and the -ing after verbs denoting the beginning, middle and end of an event. Folio Linguistica, 23(3), 295–331.Google Scholar
Edwards, A
(2014) The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes, 33(2), 173–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, G.M
(1974) Semantic and Syntactic Irregularity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S
(Ed.) (1996) Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th
(2003) Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
(2015a) Quantitative linguistics. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 725–732). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) The role of quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus and experimental data on (relative) frequency and contingency of words and constructions. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Change of Paradigms - New Paradoxes: Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics (pp. 311–325). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Adelman, A.S
(2014) Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms (pp. 35–54). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Bernaisch, T
(2016) Exploring epicenters empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide, 37(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Deshors, S.C
(2014) Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora, 9(1), 109–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 130–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Wulff, S
Hoffmann, T
(2014) The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. In S. Buschfeld, T. Hoffmann, M. Huber & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond (pp. 160–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaleta, A
(2012) The English gerund vs. the to-infinitive: The case of aspectual constructions. Selected papers from UK-CLA Meetings . Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed June 2014).
Khamis, A
(2015, July). Cross-varietal variation in English verb complementation: A multivariate corpus analysis. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference 2015 , Newcastle upon Tyne.
Koch, C
(2015) Routines in lexis and grammar: A ‘gravity’ approach within the International Corpus of English. Paper presented at the ICAME 36 conference , Universität Trier, 27-29 May 2015.
Kuperman, V., & Bresnan, J
(2012) The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 588–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R
(1991) Cognitive Grammar 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liaw, A., & Wiener, M
(2015) randomForest. Version 4.6-12. A package for R. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed February 2016).
Mair, C
(2002) Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 105–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) The world system of English. English World-Wide, 34(3), 253–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez-García, M.T., & Wulff, S
(2012) Not wrong, yet not quite right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 225–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuki, K., Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J.A
(2016) The Random Forests statistical technique: An examination of its value for the study of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(1), 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mindt, D
(2000) An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J., & Gries, St. Th
Mukherjee, J., & Hoffmann, S
Mukherjee, J., & Schilk, M
(2008) Verb-complementational profiles across varieties of English: Comparing verb classes in Indian English and British English. In T. Nevalainen, I Taavitsainen, P. Pahta & M. Korhonen (Eds.), The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present (pp. 163–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, C., Mukherjee, S., Schilk, M., & Mukherjee, J
(2013) Statistical analysis of varieties of English. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176(3), 777–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, D
(2003) Is there semantics in all syntax? The case of accusative and infinitive constructions vs. that-clauses. In G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Vol.2, Complex Constructions (pp. 52–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, M
(1985) Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 2. Complex Constructions (pp. 42–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olavarría de Ersson, E., & Shaw, P
(2003)) Verb complementation patterns in Indian standard English. English World-Wide, 24(2), 137–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
2012R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL] (last accessed July 2012)
Ransom, E
(1979) Definiteness and animacy constraints on passives and double object constructions in English. Glossa, 13(2), 215–240.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G
(1995) On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies, 76(4), 367–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilk, M., Bernaisch, T., & Mukherjee, J
(2012) Mapping unity and diversity in South Asian English lexicogrammar. In M. Hundt & U. Gut (Eds.), Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes (pp. 137–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilk, M., Mukherjee, J., Nam, C., & Mukherjee, S
(2013) Complementation of ditransitive verbs in south Asian Englishes: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(2), 187–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shastri, S.V
(1996) Using computer corpora in the description of language with special reference to complementation in Indian English. In R.J. Baumgardner (Ed.), South Asian English: Structure, Use, and Users (pp. 70–81). Urbana & Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, E
(2007) Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.B., & Escobedo, J
(2002) The semantics of to-infinitival vs. -ing verb complement constructions in English. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston & S. Neuvel (Eds.), Proceedings from the Main Session in the Chicago Linguistics Society’s Thirty-Seventh Meeting (pp. 549–564). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., & Kortmann, B
(2011) Typological profiling: Learner Englishes versus L2 varieties of English. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap (pp. 167–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z
(1957) Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy, 66(2). 143–160.Google Scholar
Vosberg, U
(2003) The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in modern English. In G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English (pp. 329–345). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A
(1988) The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., & Gries, St. Th
(2015) Prenominal adjective order preferences in Chinese and German L2 English: A multifactorial corpus study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(1), 122–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 36 other publications

Bernaisch, Tobias & Nina Funke
2024. Particle Placement in Hong Kong English: Independence from Great Britain as a Trigger of Structural Change?. Journal of English Linguistics DOI logo
Béchet, Christophe
2020. An empirical perspective on the contact between English and French: a case study on substitutive complex prepositions. Linguistics Vanguard 6:s2 DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3  pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes. English Text Construction 10:1  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2018. Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Mandative subjunctive versus should in world Englishes: a new take on an old alternation. Corpora 15:2  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Sandra Götz
2020. Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Egbert, Jesse & Luke Plonsky
2020. Bootstrapping Techniques. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,  pp. 593 ff. DOI logo
García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3  pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Gardner, Matt Hunt, Eva Uffing, Nicholas Van Vaeck, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Stefan Th. Gries
2021. Variation isn’t that hard: Morphosyntactic choice does not predict production difficulty. PLOS ONE 16:6  pp. e0252602 ff. DOI logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Grafmiller, Jason & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2018. Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change 30:3  pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2017. Syntactic alternation research. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31  pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2022. MuPDAR for corpus-based learner and variety studies. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105],  pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th., Santa Barbara, Justus Liebig & Sandra C. Deshors
2020. There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies. ICAME Journal 44:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th., Tobias Bernaisch & Benedikt Heller
Heller, Benedikt, Tobias Bernaisch & Stefan Th. Gries
2017. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Ivaska, Ilmari, Mirva Johnson & Tommi Kurki
2023. Identifying the dialectal background of American Finnish speakers using a supervised machine-learning model. Nordic Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ivaska, Ilmari & Anne Tamm
2024. Same yet different. Linguistic Variation DOI logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. New Light on -Ing Complements of Prevent, with Recent Data from Large Corpora. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English,  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. Conclusion. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English,  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. Introduction. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kekki, Niina & Ilmari Ivaska
2022. The use of synonymous adjectives by learners of Finnish as a second language. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee & Gert De Sutter
2018. Alternations in contact and non-contact varieties. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Laliberté, Catherine, Melanie Keller & Diana Wengler
2023. “So, I trucked out to the border, learned to say ain’t, came to find work”: the sociolinguistics of Firefly . Linguistics Vanguard 9:s3  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Lee,Yong-hun & 유지희
2017. A Random Forest Analysis of Can and May in Korean EFL Learners’ Writings. English Language and Linguistics 23:3  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Lester, Nicholas A.
2019. That’s hard. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
MERILÄINEN, LEA
2017. The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes 36:4  pp. 760 ff. DOI logo
Moretti, Lorenzo
2023. The Functions of Auxiliary Do in Middle English Poetry: A Quantitative Study. Journal of English Linguistics 51:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8  pp. 1151 ff. DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2023. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica 95:1  pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Shadrova, Anna, Pia Linscheid, Julia Lukassek, Anke Lüdeling & Sarah Schneider
2021. A Challenge for Contrastive L1/L2 Corpus Studies: Large Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation Across Morphological, but Not Global Syntactic Categories in Task-Based Corpus Data of a Homogeneous L1 German Group. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Wulff, Stefanie & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Exploring Individual Variation in Learner Corpus Research: Methodological Suggestions. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.