Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 21:4 (2016) ► pp.527–558

Finding source domain triggers

How corpus methodologies aid in the analysis of conceptual metaphor

| San Francisco State University

Much recent research on figurative language and conceptual metaphor theory derives from corpus examination, and analysts are increasingly focused on the development of quantificational tools to reveal co-occurrence patterns indicative of source and target domain associations. Some mappings between source and target are transparent and appear in collocation patterns in natural language data. However, other metaphors, especially those that structure abstract processes, are more complex because the target domain is lexically divorced from the source. Using economic discourse as a case study, this paper introduces new techniques directed at the quantitative evaluation of metaphorical occurrence when target and source relationships are nonobvious. Constellations of source-domain triggers are identified in the data and shown to disproportionately emerge in topic-specific discourse.

Keywords: conceptual metaphor, economic discourse, collocation, lexicalization patterns, political discourse
Published online: 6 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.4.04led
References
Ahmad, K
(2005, June). Terminology in text. Paper presented at the Tuscan Word Centre Workshop , Siena, Italy.
Babarczy, A., Bencze, I., Fekete, I., & Simon, E
(2010) The automatic identification of conceptual metaphors in Hungarian texts: A corpus-based analysis. In N. Bel, B. Daille, & A. Vasiljevs (Eds.), LREC 2010 Workshop on Methods for the Automatic Acquisition of Language Resources: Proceedings (pp. 30–37). Malta.Google Scholar
Boers, F
(1997) “No pain, no gain” in a free market rhetoric: A test for cognitive semantics? Metaphor & Symbol, 12(4), 231–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M
(1997) A few metaphorical models in (western) economic discourse. In W.A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 115–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S
(2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J
(2004) Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W
(2012) Exploring Corpus Linguistics. England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T
(2005) Blended and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1510–1536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
David, O., Dodge, E., Hong, J., Stickles, E., & Sweetser, E
(2014, September). Building the MetaNet metaphor repository: The natural symbiosis of metaphor analysis and construction grammar. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG 8) , Osnabrück, Germany.
Davies, M
(2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present [Online Corpus].Google Scholar
(2009) The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 14(2), 159–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A
(2005) Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Figurative language in discourse. In H.J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics (pp. 437–462). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demmen, J., Seminoi, E., Demjén, Z., Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Payne, S
(2015) A computer-assisted study of the use of violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(20), 205–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desagulier, G
(2014) Visualizing distances in a set of near synonyms: Rather, quite, fairly, and pretty . In D. Glynn & J. Robinson (Eds.), Polysemy and Synonymy: Corpus Methods and Applications in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.145–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodge, E., Hong, J., & Stickles, E
(2015, June). Deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis. Paper presented at The Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP , Denver, Colorado. DOI logo
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M
(2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausey, C.M., & Matlock, T
(2011) Can grammar win elections? Political Psychology, 32(4), 563–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W
(2010) The wonderful, chaotic, creative, heroic, challenging world of researching and applying metaphor. In G. Low, A. Deignan, L. Cameron, & Z. Todd (Eds.) Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World (pp.1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Nayak, N
(1989) Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 100–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovár, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychly, P., & Suchomel, V
(2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Semino, E
(2008) Using a semantic annotation tool for the analysis of metaphor in discourse. Metaphorik.de, 15(1), 141–160.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2010) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(2002) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to your Brain and its Politics. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Wehling, E
(2012) The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
L’Hôte, E
(2014) Identity, Narrative and Metaphor: A Corpus-based Cognitive Analysis of New Labour Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T
(2012) Framing political messages with grammar and metaphor. American Scientist, 100(6), 478–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D.N
(1986) The Rhetoric of Economics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books and Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Musolff, A
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oster, U
(2010) Using corpus methodology for semantic and pragmatic analyses: What can corpora tell us about the linguistic expression of emotions? Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 727–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P., Archer, D., Piao, S., & McEnery, T
(2004) The UCREL semantic analysis system. In Proceedings of the workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic labeling for NLP tasks in association with the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004) (pp. 7–12). Paris, France: European Language Resources Association.
Rayson, P
(2008) From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H
(2000) English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shenker-Osorio, A
(2012) Don’t Buy It: The Trouble with Talking Nonsense about the Economy. Philadelphia, PA: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Shutova, E., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A
(2013) Computational Linguistics, 39(2), 301–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skorczynska, H., & Deignan, A
(2006) Readership and purpose in the choice of economics metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(2), 87–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A
(2005) The function of metaphor: Developing a corpus-based perspective. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(2), 161–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stickles, E., Dodge, E., & Hong, J
(2014, November). A construction-driven, MetaNet-based approach to metaphor extraction and corpus analysis. Paper presented at the 12th meeting of Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language (CSDL 12) , Santa Barbara, California.
Sullivan, K
(2009) Grammatical constructions in metaphoric language. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Dziwirek (Eds.) Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics (pp. 57–80). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
Tang, X., Qu, W., Chen, X., & Yu, S
(2010, December). Automatic metaphor recognition based on semantic relation patterns. Paper presented at the International Conference on Asian Language Processing , Harbin, China. DOI logo
Wulf, S
(2010) Rethinking Idiomaticity: A Usage-based Approach. London: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Lederer, Jenny
2019. Lexico-grammatical alignment in metaphor construal. Cognitive Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Sullivan, Karen
2023. Three levels of framing. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:5 DOI logo
Tatsenko, Nataliia, Vitalii Stepanov & Hanna Shcherbak
2020. CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF POLITICS IN AMERICAN ENGLISH. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:2 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.