Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Concordancing for CADS

Practical challenges and theoretical implications

ORCID logo | Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU)
ORCID logo | Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU)
Concordance analysis is widely recognised as one of the main techniques in a corpus linguist’s toolkit. However, despite a growing body of work critically exploring previously unquestioned mainstays of corpus methods (Mautner, 2015; Taylor & Marchi, 2018), this has not focused on concordance analysis specifically. In this paper, we aim to discuss issues that researchers may encounter when interpreting concordances. We begin in Step One with a cursory examination of 800 concordance lines in order to identify potential issues. In Step Two, we assess the distribution of those issues in a reduced sample of 200. As a result, we identify eight interpretability issues: noise in the corpus, non-standard syntax, unclear referring expressions, unclear quotation source attribution, technical terms/jargon, acronyms/initialisms, unspecific co-text, and lines unrelated to the research question. After reflecting on practical challenges, we discuss the epistemological implications of removing concordance lines uncritically and suggest ten recommendations for future work.
Keywords: concordancing, concordance analysis, corpus-assisted discourse studies, epistemology, interpretability
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Analysing concordances
    • 2.1The concordance line: A useful artefact
    • 2.2Reflections on procedure
    • 2.3Types of concordance analysis
  • 3.Our research design
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Step One: Cursory examination of 800 concordance lines
    • 4.2Step Two: Categorising interpretability issues
  • 5.Epistemological implications
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 27 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21168.gil
References
Anthony, L.
(2018) Visualisation in corpus-based discourse studies. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp. 197–224). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022) AntConc (Version 4) [Computer software]. Waseda University. [URL]
Appleton, S.
(2021) East, West, and Westminster: A corpus-based study of UK foreign policy statements regarding the unification of Germany, October 1989 to November 1990. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 4 1, 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, D., & Gillings, M.
(2020) Depictions of deception: A corpus-based analysis of five Shakespearean characters. Language and Literature, 29 (3), 246–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.
(2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Conclusion: Reflecting on reflective research. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp. 281–292). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balfour, J.
(2019) ‘The mythological marauding violent schizophrenic’: Using the word sketch tool to examine representations of schizophrenic people as violent in the British press. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 2 1, 40–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BNC Consortium
(2007) British National Corpus (version 3, BNC XML ed.). [URL]
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N.
(2010) Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1213–1218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, L.
(2019) Corpus Linguistics for Online Communication: A Guide for Research. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Gillings, M.
(2018) Politeness variation in England: A north-south divide? In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014 (pp. 33–59). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, T., & Rodríguez-Puente, P.
(2019) Corpus-Based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillings, M., Mautner, G., & Baker, P.
(2023) Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R.
(2020) Twitter reactions to the UN’s #HeForShe campaign for gender equality: A corpus-based discourse analysis. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 3 1, 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joulain, A. T.
(2017) Corpus Linguistics for History: The Methodology of Investigating Place-name Discourses in Digitised Nineteenth-century Newspapers. [Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University research directory. DOI logo
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V.
(2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1 (1), 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopf, S.
(2019) Content policies in social media critical discourse studies: The invisible hand of social media providers? Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 11 (1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Larsson, T., Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
(2022) On the status of statistical reporting versus linguistic description in corpus linguistics: A ten-year perspective. Corpora, 17 (1), 137–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leitch, S., & Palmer, I.
(2010) Analysing texts in context: Current practices and new protocols for critical discourse analysis in organization studies. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1194–1212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levon, E.
(2016) Qualitative analysis of stance. In P. Baker & J. Egbert (Eds.), Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research (pp. 152–166). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lutzky, U.
(2021) “You keep saying you are sorry”. Exploring the use of sorry in customer communication on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 39 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchi, A.
(2018) Dividing up the data: Epistemological, methodological and practical impact of diachronic segmentation. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp. 174–196). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchi, A., & Taylor, C.
(2018) Introduction: Partiality and reflexivity. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp. 1–15). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mautner, G.
(2015) Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, (3rd ed., pp. 154–179). SAGE.Google Scholar
(2022) What can a corpus tell us about discourse? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, (2nd ed., pp. 250–262). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mautner, G., & Learmonth, M.
(2020) From administrator to CEO: Exploring changing representations of hierarchy and prestige in a diachronic corpus of academic management writing. Discourse & Communication, 14 (3), 273–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., Baker, H., & Dayrell, C.
(2019) Working at the interface of hydrology and corpus linguistics: Using corpora to identify unrecorded droughts in nineteenth-century Britain. In J. Egbert & P. Baker (Eds.), Using Corpus Methods to Triangulate Linguistic Analysis (pp. 52–84). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Analysing the impacts of 19th-century drought: A corpus-based study. In M. Fuster-Márquez, C. Gregori-Signes, J. Santaemilia, & P. Rodríguez-Abruñeiras (Eds.), Exploring Discourse and Ideology Through Corpora (pp. 47–70). Peter Lang Publishing Group.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Brezina, V.
(2022) Fundamental Principles of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C.
(2013) Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C.
(2018) Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52 (4), 1893–1907. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P.
(2018) Metaphor, Cancer, and the End of Life: A Corpus-based Study. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1999) A way with common words. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johnasson (pp. 157–179). Rodopi.Google Scholar
(2003) Reading Concordances: An Introduction. Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., & Marchi, A.
(2018) Corpus Approaches to Discourse. Routledge.Google Scholar
Weisser, M.
(2016) Practical Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction to Corpus-based Language Analysis. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zottola, A.
(2018) Transgender identity labels in the British press: A corpus-based discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 7 (2), 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zottola, A., Jones, L., Pilnick, A., Mullany, L., Pierre Bouman, W., & Arcelus, J.
(2021) Identifying coping strategies used by patients at a transgender health clinic through analysis of free-text autobiographical narratives. Health Expectations, 24 (2), 719–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar