Impolite behaviour tends to attract more evaluative comment than other facework, making it easier to investigate synchronically and diachronically. A reliance on metapragmatic commentary is not optimum for UK parliamentary studies, however, as MPs cannot use “insulting or rude language” that breaks the chamber’s “rules of politeness” (www.parliament.uk). The work reported here thus offers three innovative methods of tracing MPs’ facework as they negotiated the “unparliamentary language” prohibition, and the results gleaned when the methods were applied to Hansard records (1812–2004). Method 1 prioritises portmanteau tags made up of USAS semtags. Method 2 prioritises themes derived from the HTOED. Method 3 draws on ‘meaning constellations’ (i.e. simultaneous searches of multiple tags). The UK parliamentary website highlights the “considerable ingenuity” displayed by MPs in order to circumvent their unparliamentary language prohibition. All methods have found examples of such ingenuity, many of which are characterized by multiple facework intentions (Archer 2015).
Archer, D. (2015). Slurs, insults, (backhanded) compliments and other strategic facework moves. Language Sciences 521, 82–97.
Baron, A., & Rayson, P. (2008, May). VARD 2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. Paper presented at the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics, Birmingham, UK.
Baumeister, R. F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 163–76.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge.
Cockcroft, R., & Cockcroft, S. (2005). Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric (2nd. ed.). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Crewe, E. (2005). Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J., & Demmen, J. (2011). Nineteenth-century English politeness: Negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of the individual self. In M. Bax & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), Understanding Historical (Im)politeness (pp.49–80). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome’s Press.
Farrelly, M., & Seoane, E. (2012). Democratization. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of English (pp.392–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fetzer, A., & Bull, P. (2012). Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse & Society, 23(2), 127–144.
Finch, E., & Fafinski, S. (2015). Legal Skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Harris, S. (2001). Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & Society, 12(4), 451–472.
Johnson, A., & Clifford, R. (2011). Polite incivility in defensive attack: Strategic politeness and impoliteness in cross-examination in the David Irving vs. Penguin Books Ltd and Deborah Lipstadt trial. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 7(1), 43–71.
Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. M. Suls (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives of the Self (pp.231–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jucker, A. H. (2012). Changes in politeness cultures. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of English (pp.422–433). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kopytko, R. (1995) Against rationalistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 231, 475–91.
Leech, G. N., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp.66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Locher, M., & Watts, R. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp.77–100). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
May, E., & Sweetman, J. F. (Eds.) (1989). Erskine May’s Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament (21st ed.) London: Butterworths.
Penman, R. (1990). Facework & politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(1/2), 15–38.
Rayson, P. (2008). Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment [Computer software]. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Available at [URL](last accessed May 2017).
Reid, C. (2012). Imprison’d Wranglers: The Rhetorical Culture of the House of Commons 1760–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smiles, S. (1859). Self-Help; with Illustrations of Character and Conduct. London: John Murray.
Trilling, L. (1967). Beyond Culture: Essays on Literature and Learning. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Ward, J. (1980). The Hansard Chronicles. Toronto: Deneau and Greenberg.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (2006). Anglo scripts against “putting pressure” on other people and their linguistic manifestations. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Ethnopragmatics. Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context (pp. 31–63). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Landone, Elena
2022. Corpus Analysis. In Methodology in Politeness Research [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 217 ff.
Haselow, Alexander & Sylvie Hancil
2018. Rethinking language change from a dialogic perspective. Language Sciences 68 ► pp. 1 ff.
Archer, Dawn
2017. Mapping Hansard Impression Management Strategies through Time and Space. Studia Neophilologica 89:sup1 ► pp. 5 ff.
2018. Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard. Language Sciences 68 ► pp. 22 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.