Article published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2017) ► pp. 85106
References
Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V.
(2008) Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L.
(2014) AntConc (Version 3.4.3w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press Madison.Google Scholar
Becher, T., & Trowler, P.
(2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1989) Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Burgess, A., & Ivanič, R.
(2010) Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W., & Nichols, J.
(1986) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Orwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Channell, J.
(1994) Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, M.
(2006) The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the noun “that” pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 203–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A.
(2000) A new academic word list. Tesol Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.
(1996) Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), 475–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T.
(2006) Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J.
(2003) Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Use of signalling nouns across L1 and L2 writer corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 36–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, G.
(1986) Anaphoric Nouns. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M.
(1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guinda, C. S., & Hyland, K.
(2012) Introduction: A context-sensitive approach to stance and voice. In K. Hyland & C. Guinda, Sancho (Eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp. 1–11). London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1993a) The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp. 137–146). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
(1993b) The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin’s The Origin of the Species . In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp. 95–116). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.
(1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Taylor & Francis. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E.
(2004) Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techiniques in Vocabulary & Grammar. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hudson, R.
(2013) The struggle with voice in scientific writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(12), 1580–1580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2000) Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 176–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2001) Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005a) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2005b) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Guinda, C. S.
(2012) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
(2005) Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, R.
(1991) Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open-and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 93–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, R., & Camps, D.
(2001) I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1), 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, K. F., & Hyland, K.
(2015) ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 529–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MAXQDAplus
(2012) (Version 11) [Computer software]. Berlin: VERBI GmbH.Google Scholar
Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. M.
(2007) Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2011) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Moreton, E.
(2012) EFL/ESL writers and the use of shell nouns. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 126–145). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J.
(2013) Representing own and other voices in social science research articles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(2), 199–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrić, B.
(2010) Students’ conceptions of voice in academic writing. In R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas & E. Lafuente-Millán (Eds.), Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres (pp. 324–336). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Prelli, L. J.
(1989) A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D.
(1999) Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H. -J.
(2000) English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M.
(1986) Fictional worlds. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about Text (pp. 43–60). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M.
(2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, A.
(1993) The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, Description, Discourse (pp. 98–114). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tardy, C. M., & Matsuda, P. K.
(2009) The construction of author voice by editorial board members. Written Communication, 26(1), 32–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G., & Hunston, S.
(2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. Y.
(1991) Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, E. O.
(1982) Towards a Contextual Grammar of English: The Clause and its Place in the Definition of Sentence. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Full-text

Stance and voice in academic writing
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Abbasi Montazeri, Ebtesam, Alireza Jalilifar & Jorge Arus Hita
2021. Evaluative language in applied linguistics research article discussions: exploring the functions and patterns of that-structures in argumentative texts. Language Awareness  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Alghazo, Sharif, Mohd Nour Al Salem & Imran Alrashdan
2021. Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System 103  pp. 102681 ff. Crossref logo
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019.  In Register, Genre, and Style, Crossref logo
Birhan, Amare Tesfie
2021. An exploration of metadiscourse usage in book review articles across three academic disciplines: a contrastive analysis of corpus-based research approach. Scientometrics 126:4  pp. 2885 ff. Crossref logo
Curry, Niall & Pascual Pérez-Paredes
2021. Stance nouns in COVID-19 related blog posts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:4  pp. 469 ff. Crossref logo
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018. The collocation networks of stance phrases. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Hyland, Ken, Wenbin Wang & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2022. Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua 265  pp. 103205 ff. Crossref logo
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2021. ‘The goal of this analysis …’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing. Lingua 252  pp. 103017 ff. Crossref logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2021. Stance and engagement in 3MT presentations: How students communicate disciplinary knowledge to a wide audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51  pp. 100976 ff. Crossref logo
Rørvik, Sylvi
2021.  In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101],  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Simaki, Vasiliki, Carita Paradis & Andreas Kerren
2018. Evaluating stance-annotated sentences from the Brexit Blog Corpus: A quantitative linguistic analysis. ICAME Journal 42:1  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.