Article published in:
Compiling and analysing the Spoken British National Corpus 2014
Edited by Tony McEnery, Robbie Love and Vaclav Brezina
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3] 2017
► pp. 345374
References

References

Akaike, H.
(1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G.
(2001) Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A. R.
(2003) Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text, 23(3), 321–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J. W., & Schler, J.
(2007) Mining the blogosphere: Age, gender and the varieties of self-expression. First Monday, 12(9). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.
(2008) Sexed Texts: Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2014) Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London/New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Barbieri, F.
(2007) Older men and younger women: A corpus-based study of quotative use in American English. English World-Wide, 28(1), 23–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Patterns of age-based linguistic variation in American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(1), 58–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B.
(2013) lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes, R package version 0.999999-2. Retrieved from https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/package​=lme4
Biber, D.
(1991) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bradac, J. J., Mulac, A., & Thompson, S. A.
(1995) Men’s and women’s use of intensifiers and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analyses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(2), 93–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., & Meyerhoff, M.
(2014) Significant or random. A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D.
(2000) Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(3), 323–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 482–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Theorising the female voice in public contexts. In J. Baxter (Ed.), Speaking Out. The Female Voice in Public Contexts (pp. 3–20). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2007) Unanswered questions and unquestioned assumptions in the study of language and gender: Female verbal superiority. Gender & Language, 1(1), 15–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Theoretical issues for the study of gender and spoken interaction. In P. Pichler & E. Eppler (Eds.), Gender and Spoken Interaction (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Gender and language ideologies. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff & J. Holmes (Eds.), The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality (pp. 281–296). Chichester: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 367 ]
Cheshire, J.
(2002) Sex and gender in variationist research. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp. 423–443). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Christie, C.
(2002) Politeness and the linguistic construction of gender in parliament: An analysis of transgressions and apology behaviour. Working Papers on the Web, 3. Retrieved from http://​extra​.shu​.ac​.uk​/wpw​/politeness​/christie​.htm (last accessed June 2017).
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S.
(1999) New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28(2), 185–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fahs, B.
(2011) Dreaded “Otherness”. Heteronormative patrolling in women’s body hair rebellions. Gender & Society, 25(4), 451–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, K., & Bell, B.
(1995) Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like . American Speech, 70(3), 265–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R., & Gut, U.
(2016) Register variation in intensifier usage across Asian Englishes. In H. Pichler (Ed.), Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change: Insights from English: New Methods and Insights (pp. 185–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gong, W.
(2009) Linguistic variation and identity representation in personal blogs: A corpus-linguistic approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
Gray, J.
(1992) Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Griffin, P.
(2007) Sexing the economy in a neo-liberal world order: Neo-liberal discourse and the (re)production of heteronormative heterosexuality. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(2), 220–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günther, U.
(2003) What’s in a Laugh? Humour, Jokes and Laughter in the Conversational Subcorpus of the BNC (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://​www​.freidok​.uni​-freiburg​.de​/volltexte​/735/ (last accessed June 2017).
Hancock, A. B., Stutts, H. W., & Bass, A.
(2015) Perceptions of gender and femininity based on language: Implications for transgender communication therapy. Language and Speech, 58(3), 315–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.
forthcoming). The ICE metadata: A window to the past? An exploratory study of Hong Kong English. World Englishes.
Hardie, A.
(2012) CQPweb: -Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
(1998) Response to Koenraad Kuiper. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2(1), 104–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Women at work: Analysing women’s talk at New Zealand Workplaces. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Power and discourse at work: Is gender relevant? In M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 31–60). Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., Vine, B., & Johnson, G.
(1998) The Wellington Corpus of Spoken New Zealand English: A Users’ Guide. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, S.
(2016) Ladies first? Adolescent peaks in a male-led change. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 22(2), 80–90.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E.
(2003) Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P.
(2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric model. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 368 ]
Hovy, D., Johannsen, A., & Søgaard, A.
(2015, May). User review sites as a resource for large-scale sociolinguistic studies. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 452–461). ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, K. A., & Katz, A. N.
(2006) Metaphor production in online conversation: Gender and friendship status. Discourse Processes, 42(1), 75–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, R. & Tagliamonte, S.
(2003) Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society, 32(2), 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, A., & Murachver, T.
(2004) The relationship between gender and topic in gender-preferential language use. Written Communication, 21(4), 344–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1922) Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Korobov, N.
(2005) Ironizing masculinity: How adolescent boys negotiate hetero-normative dilemmas in conversational interaction. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 13(2), 225–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1990) The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: External Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N.
(2009) Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
this issue). The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3). Crossref
McEnery, A., & Xiao, Z.
(2004) Swearing in modern British English: The case of fuck in the BNC. Language and Literature, 13(3), 235–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maltz, D. J., & Borker, R. A.
(1982) A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. Gumpertz (Ed.), Language and Social Identity (pp. 196–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehl, M. R.
(2004) The sounds of social life: Exploring students’ daily social environments and natural conversations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Mills, S.
(2006) Gender and performance anxiety at academic conferences. In J. Baxter (Ed.), Speaking Out (pp. 61–80). Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Communities of practice and politeness. In B. Davies, M. Haugh & A. Merrison (Eds.), Situated Politeness (pp. 73–87). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Gibbons, P.
(2001) Empirical support for the gender‐as‐culture hypothesis. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 121–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B.
(2010) Corpus and Sociolinguistics. Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nemati, A., & Bayer, J. M.
(2007) Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women: A comparative study of Persian and English. Language in India, 7(9), 1–16.Google Scholar
Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W.
(2008) Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 211–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nowson, S.
(2006) The language of Weblogs: A study of genre and individual differences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Núñez Pertejo, P., & Palacios Martínez, I.
(2014) That’s absolutely crap, totally rubbish: The use of the intensifiers absolutely and totally in the spoken language of British adults and teenagers. Functions of Language, 21(2): 210–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palacios Martínez, I., & Núñez Pertejo, P.
(2012) He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she is a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text & Talk, 32(6), 773–796. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 369 ]
Pugh, T., & Wallace, D. L.
(2006) Heteronormative heroism and queering the school story in JK Rowling’s Harry Potter Series. Children's Literature Association Quarterly, 31(3), 260–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2008) A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://​www​.Rproject​.org (last accessed June 2017).
Rayson, P., Geoffrey, L., & Hodges, M.
(1997) Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2(1). 133–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Röndahl, G., Bruhner, E., & Lindhe, J.
(2009) Heteronormative communication with lesbian families in antenatal care, childbirth and postnatal care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(11), 2337–2344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, C.
(2007) Conversation in Context: A Corpus-driven Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010) Conversational grammar-feminine grammar? A sociopragmatic corpus study. Journal of English Linguistics, 38(1), 56–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schler, J., Koppel, M., Argamon, S., & Pennebaker, J. W.
(2006) Effects of age and gender on blogging. AAAI spring symposium: Computational approaches to analyzing weblogs, 6, 199–205.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. -J.
(2003) Do women and men really live in different cultures? Evidence from the BNC. In Wilson, A., P. Rayson & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora by the Lune: a Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 185–221). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schweinberger, M.
(2014) The Discourse Marker LIKE: A Corpus-based Analysis of Selected Varieties of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Stenström, A.B.
(1999) He was really gormless – She’s bloody crap: Girls, boys and intensifiers. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora (pp. 69–78). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stenström, A. B., Andersen, G. & Hasund, I.
(2002) Trends in Teenage Talk. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stoffel, C.
(1901) Intensives and Down-Toners: A Study in English Adverbs. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.
(2008) So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & D’Arcy, A.
(2009) Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation and language change. Language, 85(1), 58–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Roberts, C.
(2005) So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends . American Speech, 80(3), 280–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H.
(2009) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R.
(2015) Gender and language: Cultural concerns. In J. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 698–703). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, R., & Tao, H.
(2007) A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies, 1(2), 241–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yaguchi, M., Iyeiri, Y., & Baba, Y.
(2010) Speech style and gender distinctions in the use of very and real/really: An analysis of the Corpus of Spoken Professional American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 585–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], Crossref logo
Aijmer, Karin
2020.  In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Aijmer, Karin
2021. “That’s well good”: A Re-emergent Intensifier in Current British English. Journal of English Linguistics 49:1  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo
An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang
2021. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) Crossref logo
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020.  In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
CLARIDGE, CLAUDIA, EWA JONSSON & MERJA KYTÖ
2020. Entirely innocent: a historical sociopragmatic analysis of maximizers in the Old Bailey Corpus. English Language and Linguistics 24:4  pp. 855 ff. Crossref logo
Claridge, Claudia, Ewa Jonsson & Merja Kytö
2021. A Little Something Goes a Long Way: Little in the Old Bailey Corpus. Journal of English Linguistics 49:1  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Chen-Yu
2019. Gender and Discipline: Intensifier Variation in Academic Lectures. Corpus Pragmatics 3:3  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2020.  In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. How Learner Corpus Research can inform language learning and teaching. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 43:2  pp. 196 ff. Crossref logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2021.  In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218],  pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo
Stratton, James M.
2020. A diachronic analysis of the adjective intensifier well from Early Modern English to Present Day English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 65:2  pp. 216 ff. Crossref logo
Stratton, James M.
2020. Adjective Intensifiers in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32:2  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka, Adebola Adebileje & Rotimi Olanrele Oladipupo
2021. Intensifier Usage in Nigerian English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Corpus Pragmatics 5:3  pp. 335 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Jiawei
2020. Love, R. (2020). Overcoming Challenges in Corpus Construction: The spoken British National Corpus 2014 . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:4  pp. 504 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.