Article published in:
Compiling and analysing the Spoken British National Corpus 2014
Edited by Tony McEnery, Robbie Love and Vaclav Brezina
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3] 2017
► pp. 403428
References

References

Bäcklund, U.
(1970) The Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in English. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Bailey, G.
(2002) Real and apparent time. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp. 312–332). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barnfield, K., & Buchstaller, I.
(2010), Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide, 31(2), 252–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borst, E.
(1902) Die Gradadverbien im Englischen. Heidelberg: C. Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
[ p. 426 ]
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G.
(2002) Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bing, J., & Bergvall, V.
(1998) The question of questions: Beyond binary thinking. In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader (pp. 495–510). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D.
(1972) Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradac, J., Mulac, A., & Thompson, S.
(1995) Men’s and women’s use of intensifiers and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analyses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(2), 93–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D.
(2009) The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J.
(1996) Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004) Women, Men, and Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Drescher, N.
(2003 July). The relationships among gender, power, and register in the American academic community. Paper presented at the international conference of Perception and Realization in Language and Gender Research, East Lansing, MI.
Fahy, P. J.
(2002) Use of linguistic qualifiers and intensifiers in a computer conference. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 5–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A.
(2012) CQPweb – Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ito, R., & Tagliamonte, S.
(2003)  Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society, 32(2), 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1922) Language: Its Nature, Development and Origins. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kortmann, B.
(2005) English Linguistics: Essentials. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1972a) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. T.
(1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
(this issue) The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y.
(2006) Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R.
(2002) Extremely interesting. Very interesting, or only quite interesting? Adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(3), 398–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B.
(2010) Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, B.
(2008) Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 213–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, T.
(2008) Social variation in intensifiers use: Constraint on -ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 289–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, A.
(1972) Sex, Gender and Society. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Perkuhn, R., Keibel, H., & Kupietz, M.
(2012) Korpuslinguistik. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
[ p. 427 ]
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rayson, P.
(2014) CLAWS part-of-speech tagger. Retrieved from http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/claws (last accessed September 2016).
Romaine, S.
(1994) Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stenström, A.
(1999) He was really gormless – She’s bloody crap. Girls, boys and intensifiers. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 69–78). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stoffel, C.
(1901) Intensives and Down-toners: A Study in English Adverbs. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Roberts, C.
(2005) So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech, 80(3), 280–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, M.
(2010) Language and Gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
(1972) Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, (1)2, 179–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasilieva, I.
(2004 September). Gender-specific use of boosting and hedging adverbs in English computer-related texts – A corpus-based study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language, Politeness and Gender, Helsinki, Finland.
Weatherall, A.
(2002) Gender, Language and Discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xiao, R., & Tao, H.
(2007) A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies, 1(2), 241–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Aijmer, Karin
2020.  In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Aijmer, Karin
2021. “That’s well good”: A Re-emergent Intensifier in Current British English. Journal of English Linguistics 49:1  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo
CLARIDGE, CLAUDIA, EWA JONSSON & MERJA KYTÖ
2020. Entirely innocent: a historical sociopragmatic analysis of maximizers in the Old Bailey Corpus. English Language and Linguistics 24:4  pp. 855 ff. Crossref logo
Claridge, Claudia, Ewa Jonsson & Merja Kytö
2021. A Little Something Goes a Long Way: Little in the Old Bailey Corpus. Journal of English Linguistics 49:1  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Chen-Yu
2019. Gender and Discipline: Intensifier Variation in Academic Lectures. Corpus Pragmatics 3:3  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.