“In barbarous times and in uncivilized countries”
Two centuries of the evolving uncivil in the Hansard Corpus
The ways in which politicians have discussed who, what, and where was considered “uncivilized’” across the past two centuries gives an insight into how speakers in a position of authority classified and constructed the world around them, and how those in power in Britain see the country and themselves. This article uses the Hansard Corpus 1803–2003 of speeches in the UK Parliament alongside data from the Historical Thesaurus of English to analyse diachronic variation in usage of words for persons, places and practices considered uncivil. It proposes new methods and offers quantitative data to describe the period’s shift in political attitudes towards not just the so-called “uncivil” but also the country as a whole.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Our data: The Historical Thesaurus and the Hansard Corpus
- 3.Sense-families and the Uncivil
- 4.The development of the uncivilized
- 4.1Types of referents
- 4.2Sense-families
- 4.3Foreign and domestic
- 4.4Past and present
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Note
-
References
References (35)
References
Abercrombie, G., & Batista-Navarro, R. (2018a). A sentiment-labelled corpus of Hansard parliamentary debate speeches. In Proceedings of ParlaCLARIN. Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure (pp.43–47). CLARIN. [URL]
Abercrombie, G., & Batista-Navarro, R. (2018b). HanDeSeT: Hansard Debates with Sentiment Tags [Data set]. Mendeley. 

Alexander, M. (forthcoming). Speech in the British Hansard
. In M. Korhonen, H. Kotze, & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space. John Benjamins.
Alexander, M., Dallachy, F., Piao, S., Baron, A., & Rayson, P. (2015). Metaphor, popular science, and semantic tagging: Distant reading with the Historical Thesaurus of English. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities,
30
(s1), i16–i27. 

Alexander, M., & Davies, M. (2015). The Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. [URL]
Alexander, M., & Struan, A. (2013). “In countries so unciviliz’d as those?” The language of incivlity and the British experience of the world. In M. Farr & X. Guégan (Eds.), Experiencing Imperialism: Interdisciplinary and Transnational Perspectives on the Colonial and Post-Colonial British (pp. 232–249). Palgrave Macmillan.
Archer, D. (2017). Mapping Hansard impression management strategies through time and space. Studia Neophilologica,
89
(s1), 5–20. 

Barkawi, T., & Brighton, S. (2013). Brown Britain: Post-colonial politics and grand strategy. International Affairs,
89
(5), 1109–1123. 

Baron, A., & Rayson, P. (2008). VARD 2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. In Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics. [URL]
Bell, D. (2010). John Stuart Mill on colonies. Political Theory,
38
(1), 34–64. 

BNC Consortium. (2007). British National Corpus (version 3, BNC XML ed.). [URL]
Bourne, H. R. F. (1900). The Claims of Uncivilized Races: A paper submitted to the International Congress on Colonial Sociology, held in Paris in August, 1900. In Foreign and Commonwealth Office Collection, King’s College London.
Colley, L. (2014). Empires of writing: Britain, America and constitutions, 1776–1848. Law and History Review,
32
(2), 237–266. 

Edgerton, D. (2018). The Rise and Fall of the British Nation: A Twentieth Century History. Penguin.
Fitzmaurice, A. (2012). Liberalism and empire in nineteenth-century international law. The American Historical Review,
117
(1), 122–140. 

Foreign and Commonwealth Office. (2006). Active Diplomacy for a Changing World: The UK’s International Priorities. TSO.
Hansard at Huddersfield Project. (2022). Hansard at Huddersfield. University of Huddersfield. [URL]
Hiltunen, T., Räikkönen, J., & Tyrkkö, J. (2020). Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. Language Sciences,
79
1, 1–16. 

Jeffries, L., & Sanjurjo-González, H. (2019, May 15–17). Making corpus-based searching accessible for non-expert users: The case of Hansard [Paper presentation]. XI International Conference on Corpus Linguistics (CILC 2019) conference. Valencia, Spain.
Kay, C., Alexander, M., Dallachy, F., Roberts, J., Samuels, M., & Wotherspoon, I. (Eds.). (2022). The Historical Thesaurus of English (Version 5.0). [URL]
Kumar, K. (2012). Greece and Rome in the British Empire: Contrasting role models. Journal of British Studies,
51
(1), 76–101. 

Leech, G., Garside, R., & Bryant, M. (1994). CLAWS4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94) (pp. 622–628). [URL]. 
McEnery, T., & Baker, H. (2016). Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. Bloomsbury.
Mollin, S. (2007). The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora,
2
(2), 187–210. 

Morris, J. (2011). How great is Britain? Power, responsibility and Britain’s future global role. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations,
13
(3), 326–347. 

Piao, S., Dallachy, F., Baron, A., Demmen, J., Wattam, S., Durkin, P., McCracken, J., Rayson, P., & Alexander, M. (2017). A time-sensitive historical thesaurus-based semantic tagger for deep semantic annotation. Computer Speech and Language,
46
1, 113–35. 

Pietsch, T. (2013). Rethinking the British world. Journal of British Studies,
52
(2), 441–463. 

Rayson, P., Archer, D., Piao, S., & McEnery, T. (2004). The UCREL semantic analysis system. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labelling for NLP Tasks in Association with 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 7–12) LREC 2004. [URL]
Seely, B., & Rogers, J. (2019). Global Britain – A Twenty-first Century Vision. Henry Jackson Society. [URL]
Select Committee on Aboriginal Tribes. (1837). Report of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Aboriginal Tribes (British Settlements). Ball, Chambers, Row and Hatchard.
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory,
8
(1), 3–53. 

Slembrouck, S. (1992). The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature,
1
(2), 101–19. 

Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford University Press.
Toye, R. (2014). The rhetorical culture of the House of Commons after 1918. History,
99
(335), 270–298. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Erjavec, Tomaž, Matyáš Kopp, Nikola Ljubešić, Taja Kuzman, Paul Rayson, Petya Osenova, Maciej Ogrodniczuk, Çağrı Çöltekin, Danijel Koržinek, Katja Meden, Jure Skubic, Peter Rupnik, Tommaso Agnoloni, José Aires, Starkaður Barkarson, Roberto Bartolini, Núria Bel, María Calzada Pérez, Roberts Darģis, Sascha Diwersy, Maria Gavriilidou, Ruben van Heusden, Mikel Iruskieta, Neeme Kahusk, Anna Kryvenko, Noémi Ligeti-Nagy, Carmen Magariños, Martin Mölder, Costanza Navarretta, Kiril Simov, Lars Magne Tungland, Jouni Tuominen, John Vidler, Adina Ioana Vladu, Tanja Wissik, Väinö Yrjänäinen & Darja Fišer
2024.
ParlaMint II: advancing comparable parliamentary corpora across Europe.
Language Resources and Evaluation 
Hiltunen, Turo & Turo Vartiainen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.