Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 7:2 (2002) ► pp.215–244
Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English
Word frequency lists are a standard resource for many theoretical, descriptive and applied questions. However, due to severe problems of definition, there are no equivalent lists which give the frequency of phrases. This paper proposes two independent methods of studying the frequent phraseology of English. First, using a data-base of the most frequent collocations between word-forms in a 200-million word corpus, the strength of attraction between pairs of content words is discussed. Second, using a corpus of 2.5 million words, some of the most frequent phrases, in the sense of strings of uninterrupted word-forms, are identified, and their lexical, grammatical and semantic features are discussed.
Keywords: recurrent word-combinations, phraseology, collocations, word frequency
Cited by
Cited by 52 other publications
Alcaraz-Mármol, Gema & Jorge Soto-Almela
2022. Refugees’ dehumanization in the Spanish media: A corpus-assisted study within the semantic preference framework
. Applied Linguistics Review 13:5 ► pp. 791 ff. 
AYTAÇ DEMİRÇİVİ, Kadriye
2022. A Corpus-Based Comparative Analysis of Dedikodu and Gıybet in Turkish. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 8:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
BARABADİ, Elyas, Mohammad Ali ROBATJAZİ & Mokarrameh BAYAT
2020. A phraseological examination of research articles in the field of environment using key phrase frame. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Bendinelli, Marion
2017. Segments phraséologiques et séquences textuelles. Corpus :17
Bestgen, Yves
2018. Evaluating the frequency threshold for selecting lexical bundles by means of an extension of the Fisher's exact test. Corpora 13:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2019. Discourse studies: Between social constructionism and linguistics. A critical overview. Topics in Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2021. On the development of the social-linguistic nexus in discourse research. Pragmatics and Society 12:2 ► pp. 309 ff.
Deignan, Alice, Elena Semino & Shirley-Anne Paul
2019. Metaphors of Climate Science in Three Genres: Research Articles, Educational Texts, and Secondary School Student Talk. Applied Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 379 ff.
Di Vito, Sonia
2013. L’utilisation des corpus dans l’analyse linguistique et dans l’apprentissage du FLE. Linx :68-69 ► pp. 159 ff.
Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell
2014. An eye for an eye? Exploring the cross-linguistic phraseology of
eye/øye. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
El Shazly, Reham Farouk
2021. The synergy of topoi and socio-cognition in ideology construction and identity reformation: war on terror discourse. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 13:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Estaji, Masoomeh & Mina Hashemi
2022. Phraseological competence in IELTS academic writing task 2: phraseological units and test-takers’ perceptions and use. Language Testing in Asia 12:1
Faber, Pamela & Pilar León-Araúz
2016. Specialized Knowledge Representation and the Parameterization of Context. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Fuster Márquez, Miguel
2014. Lexical bundles and phrase frames in the language of hotel websites. English Text Construction 7:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Gabrielatos, Costas
2019. If-Conditionals and Modality: Frequency Patterns and Theoretical Explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47:4 ► pp. 301 ff.
Ghaemi, Hamed
2022. Phraseological competence in IELTS academic writing task 2: A study of Indian test-takers’ perceptions and use. International Journal of TESOL & Education 2:4 ► pp. 48 ff.
GONG, SHU-PING & PEI-YAN WU
2012. Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near-synonymy: The HELP Verbs in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages 24:01 ► pp. 3 ff.
Gray, Bethany & Douglas Biber
2015. Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. In Current Issues in Phraseology [Benjamins Current Topics, 74], ► pp. 109 ff.
Groom, Nicholas
2005. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
Huang, Chung-Chi, Mei-Hua Chen, Ping-Che Yang & Jason S. Chang
2013. A Computer-Assisted Translation and Writing System. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing 12:4 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lan, Xijun & Yuanqi Wang
2021. 2021 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers, ► pp. 590 ff.
Laufer, Batia & Tina Waldman
2011. Verb-Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English. Language Learning 61:2 ► pp. 647 ff.
Lehto, Anu
2019. Chapter 10. The representation of citizens and monarchy in Acts of Parliament in 1800 to 2000. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 235 ff.
Lehto, Anu
2022. Chapter 9. Unhappy patients and eminent physicians. In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330], ► pp. 203 ff.
Levin, Magnus & Hans Lindquist
2015. Like I said again and again and over and over. In Current Issues in Phraseology [Benjamins Current Topics, 74], ► pp. 7 ff.
Liu, Yi, Yajun Yan, Huixian Xia & Kun Sun
2023. Analysing the longitudinal course selection panel data (2014-2020) of K-12 teachers from Zhejiang province: a comprehensive study on in-service training needs. Professional Development in Education ► pp. 1 ff.
Lv, Qianxi & Junying Liang
2019. Is consecutive interpreting easier than simultaneous interpreting? – a corpus-based study of lexical simplification in interpretation. Perspectives 27:1 ► pp. 91 ff.
Moon, R.
2006. Corpus Approaches to Idiom. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 230 ff.
Nelson, Robert
2018. How ‘chunky’ is language? Some estimates based on Sinclair's Idiom Principle. Corpora 13:3 ► pp. 431 ff.
Niu, Gui-ling
2014. Structurally and Functionally Comparative Analysis of Lexlical Bundles in the English Abstracts of Chinese and International Journals. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8922], ► pp. 349 ff.
Niu, Guiling
2015. A Corpus-Based Analysis of Lexical Bundles in English Introductions of Chinese and International Students’ Theses. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9332], ► pp. 486 ff.
Papagiannopoulou, Eirini & Grigorios Tsoumakas
2018. Local word vectors guiding keyphrase extraction. Information Processing & Management 54:6 ► pp. 888 ff.
Papagiannopoulou, Eirini & Grigorios Tsoumakas
2020. A review of keyphrase extraction. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 10:2
Pastor, Gloria Corpas
2017. Collocational Constructions in Translated Spanish: What Corpora Reveal. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 29 ff.
Petrocelli, Emilia, Laura Di Ferrante & Elisa Ghia
2022. Multi-Word Combinations in Science Communication: A Corpus-Driven Study of University Press Releases. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 12:4 ► pp. e202224 ff.
Pizarro Sánchez, Isabel
2017. Chapter 9. A corpus-based analysis of genre-specific multi-word combinations. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 221 ff.
Qassem, Mutahar
2021. Style and meaning in translations of the Qur'anic verb-noun collocations into English. PSU Research Review 5:3 ► pp. 201 ff.
Ruette, Tom, Katharina Ehret & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2016. A lectometric analysis of aggregated lexical variation in written Standard English with Semantic Vector Space models. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
Salkie, Raphael
2007. REVIEWS - Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. Pp. xviii+806.. Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 725 ff.
Sanz, Marina González
2016. Chapter 6. Lexical colloquialisation in commissions of the Andalusian Parliament. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 109 ff.
Sardinha, Tony Berber
2006. Collocation lists as instruments for metaphor detection in corpora. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 22:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Shin, Yu Kyoung
2020. Evaluative prosody and semantic preference: Extending the analysis of recurrent multiword sequences. English for Specific Purposes 59 ► pp. 45 ff.
Sivaieva, Olga
2020. CORPUS ANALYSIS OF COLLOCATIONS WITH HEALTH IN THE MEDIA TEXTS. Studia Philologica 2:15 ► pp. 14 ff.
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna & Stefania Spina
2015. Investigation of Native Speaker and Second Language Learner Intuition of Collocation Frequency. Language Learning 65:3 ► pp. 533 ff.
Soto-Almela, Jorge & Gema Alcaraz-Mármol
2019. Victims or non-humans: Exploring the semantic preference of refugees in Spanish news articles. Language & Communication 69 ► pp. 11 ff.
Taslimipoor, Shiva, Gloria Corpas Pastor & Omid Rohanian
2020. Detecting semantic difference. In Computational Phraseology [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 24], ► pp. 312 ff.
Tyrkkö, Jukka & Joanna Kopaczyk
2018. Chapter 1. Present applications and future directions in pattern-driven approaches to corpus linguistics. In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82], ► pp. 1 ff.
Vincent, Benet
2013. Investigating academic phraseology through combinations of very frequent words: A methodological exploration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12:1 ► pp. 44 ff.
Wierzbicka, Anna
2009. Exploring English Phraseology with Two Tools. Journal of English Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
Wu, Junyu & Heli Tissari
2021. Intensifier-Verb Collocations in Academic English by Chinese Learners Compared to Native-Speaker Students. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 44:4 ► pp. 470 ff.
Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery
2006. Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near Synonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.