"Utterly content in each other's company"
Semantic prosody and semantic preference
Alan Partington | Università di Bologna, Italy
In this paper I wish to examine the two related concepts of semantic prosody and semantic preference. I will begin the section on each with a definition, attempt a review of relevant current positions and then describe a number of corpus-based experiments I conducted to throw light on the two phenomena. Finally, I will try to draw some conclusions about the relationship between them.
Keywords: cohesion, intensification, semantic prosody, semantic preference, phraseology, evaluation
Published online: 29 April 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07par
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07par
Cited by
Cited by 93 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 65],
No author info given
2016.
In Contrastive Pragmatics and Translation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 261],
No author info given
2016.
In The Idiom Principle and L1 Influence [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 77],
No author info given
2019.
In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20],
No author info given
2019.
In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20],
► pp. 235 ff.
Aaron, Jessi Elana
2010. An Awkward Companion: Disability and the Semantic Landscape of English Lame.
Journal of English Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
ADIGÜZEL, Muhammet Fatih & Yeşim AKSAN
2020. Exploring the Turkish Concept İrkil-: Corpus-driven Cognitive and Lexical Profiling of a Pre-emotion.
Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 6:2 ► pp. 428 ff.
Alcaraz-Mármol, Gema & Jorge Soto-Almela
2020. Refugees’ dehumanization in the Spanish media: A corpus-assisted study within the semantic preference framework
.
Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
Baider, Fabienne H.
2015. Évaluation de la présidentiabilité (à l’interface de la sémantique lexicale et de la linguistique de corpus).
Mots :108 ► pp. 103 ff.
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2014. Oh he is olde dogge at expoundingdeadesure at a Catechisme: Some considerations on the history of the intensifying adverbdeadin English.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
Bowker, Lynne
2020. French-language COVID-19 terminology.
The Journal of Internationalization and Localization 7:1-2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Brownlie, Siobhan
2007. De l’emploi récurrent de cause dans la première traduction de Nana : quel commentaire ?.
Palimpsestes :20 ► pp. 97 ff.
Buts, Jan
2020. Phobia: a corpus study of political diagnostics.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7:1
Cao, Dung & Richard Badger
2021. Cross-linguistic influence on the use of L2 collocations: the case of Vietnamese learners.
Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
Carr, Georgia & Monika Bednarek
2019. Beyond risk and safety? Identifying shifts in sex education advice targeted at young women.
Discourse & Society 30:3 ► pp. 225 ff.
Chatti, Sami
2020. Seasonal metaphors in Arab journalistic discourse.
Metaphor and the Social World 10:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Corrigan, Roberta
2008. Beyond the Obvious.
Communication Disorders Quarterly 29:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Cortes, Viviana
2015.
In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66],
► pp. 197 ff.
Diaz, Brett A. & Marika K. Hall
2020. A corpus-driven exploration of U.S. language planning and language ideology from 2013 to 2018.
Journal of Language and Politics 19:6 ► pp. 916 ff.
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018. The collocation networks of stance phrases.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36 ► pp. 119 ff.
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2022. Identity construction and its collocation networks: a cross-register analysis of the finance domain.
Text & Talk 0:0
Dury, Pascaline
2013. Quelle(s) traduction(s) pour le terme anglais greenwashing ? Quelques observations croisées en terminologie.
Traduire :229 ► pp. 26 ff.
Dushku, Silvana & Youngshil Paek
2021. Investigating ESL learners’ awareness of semantic prosody across proficiency levels.
Language Awareness 30:3 ► pp. 234 ff.
EunJooLee
2008. An analysis of corpus-based research on TEFL and applied linguistics..
English Teaching 63:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
Flórez, Carmen Fernández
2022. The use of the intensifier bien among bilinguals in Southern Arizona Spanish and its grammaticalization process.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Forchini, Pierfranca
2013. A diachronic study of familiarizers (‘man’, ‘guys’, ‘buddy’, ‘dude’) in movie language.
Perspectives 21:4 ► pp. 504 ff.
Grabowski, Łukasz
2022. Provoke or encourage improvements? On semantic prosody in English-to-Polish translation.
Perspectives 30:1 ► pp. 120 ff.
Gu, Xin-yuan
2014. A critical discourse analysis of the Asian Women’s Fund website.
Discourse & Society 25:6 ► pp. 725 ff.
GÜNDOĞDU, Ayşe Eda
2020. Karşıtlıkların Anlambilimsel Söylem Ezgisi: Hafif ve Ağır Düğüm Sözcükleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.
SÖYLEM Filoloji Dergisi
Hauser, David J. & Norbert Schwarz
2018. How seemingly innocuous words can bias judgment: Semantic prosody and impression formation.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 75 ► pp. 11 ff.
Hsu, Chan-Chia
2021. Categorization as appraisal: Using classificatory verbs in Chinese for evaluative purposes.
Journal of Pragmatics 184 ► pp. 107 ff.
Hunt, Sally
2015.
In Corpora and Discourse Studies,
► pp. 266 ff.
Jurko, Primož
2017. Pragmatic meaning in contrast: semantic prosodies of Slovene and English.
Perspectives 25:1 ► pp. 157 ff.
Kopf, Susanne
2017. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) in the Kronen Zeitung.
Discourse, Context & Media 20 ► pp. 45 ff.
Koteyko, Nelya
2010. Mining the internet for linguistic and social data: An analysis of ‘carbon compounds’ in Web feeds.
Discourse & Society 21:6 ► pp. 655 ff.
Lehto, Anu
2019.
In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],
► pp. 235 ff.
Li, Xiaohong & Naixing Wei
2020.
In Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies in Chinese Contexts,
► pp. 115 ff.
Liu, Jianpeng, Luyao Zhang & Xiaohui Bai
2021. Dependency network-based approach to the implicit structure and semantic diffusion modes of semantic prosody.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0
MAUTNER, GERLINDE
2007. Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly.
Language in Society 36:01
Mautner, Gerlinde
2008. Tony McEnery, Richard Xiao & YuKio Tono, Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. Pp. xix, 386. Pb $33.95..
Language in Society 37:3 ► pp. 455 ff.
Mautner, Gerlinde
2011.
In Korpuspragmatik,
► pp. 83 ff.
McGee, Iain
2012. Should We Teach Semantic Prosody Awareness?.
RELC Journal 43:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
McIntyre, Dan
2018.
In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30],
► pp. 81 ff.
Mi-Lim Ryoo
2012. Lexico-grammatical Association Patterns of Little vs. Small and Big vs. Large in EFL Students’ Writing: A corpus-based study.
English Language Teaching 24:4 ► pp. 113 ff.
Mi-Lim Ryoo
2014. Examining the semantic prosody of lexical items as used in Korean contexts.
English Language Teaching 26:3 ► pp. 21 ff.
Núñez Pertejo, Paloma & Ignacio M. Palacios Martínez
2014.
That’s absolutely crap, totally rubbish
.
Functions of Language 21:2 ► pp. 210 ff.
Omidian, Taha & Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia
2020. Semantic Prosody Revisited: Implications for Language Learning.
TESOL Quarterly 54:2 ► pp. 512 ff.
Ooi, V. B.Y.
2008. The Lexis of Electronic Gaming on the Web: A Sinclairian Approach.
International Journal of Lexicography 21:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
Ostling, Michael & Richard Forest
2014. ‘Goblins, owles and sprites’: Discerning early-modern English preternatural beings through collocational analysis.
Religion 44:4 ► pp. 547 ff.
Paganoni, Maria Cristina
2019.
In Framing Big Data,
► pp. 21 ff.
Pan, Yun
2020. Searching for the unit of meaning: Knowledge construction in university small group talk.
Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
Partington, Alan
2011. Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation.
Journal of Pragmatics 43:6 ► pp. 1786 ff.
Partington, Alan
2014. Mind the gaps.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Partington, Alan
2017. Evaluative clash, evaluative cohesion and how we actually read evaluation in texts.
Journal of Pragmatics 117 ► pp. 190 ff.
Partington, Alan Scott
2009. A linguistic account of wordplay: The lexical grammar of punning.
Journal of Pragmatics 41:9 ► pp. 1794 ff.
PHOOCHAROENSİL, Supakorn
2021. Semantic prosody and collocation: A corpus study of the near-synonyms persist and persevere.
Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics ► pp. 240 ff.
Piata, Anna & Cristina Soriano
2022. The affect bias in the metaphorical representation of anticipated events.
Metaphor and the Social World 12:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Potts, Amanda
2015.
In Corpora and Discourse Studies,
► pp. 285 ff.
Pérez Blanco, María
2020. Evidential adjectives in English and Spanish journalistic opinion discourse.
Journal of Pragmatics 170 ► pp. 112 ff.
Shin, Yu Kyoung
2020. Evaluative prosody and semantic preference: Extending the analysis of recurrent multiword sequences.
English for Specific Purposes 59 ► pp. 45 ff.
Shinwoong Lee
2011. Semantic Prosody in Bilingual Dictionaries and EFL Learners’ Sentence Writings.
English Teaching 66:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Sivaeva, O.
2021. SEMANTIC PROSODY OF THE LEMMA VACCINE IN THE MEDIA TEXTS.
Studia Philologica 1:16 ► pp. 42 ff.
Snefjella, Bryor & Victor Kuperman
2016. It’s all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.
Cognition 156 ► pp. 135 ff.
Soro, Tommie, Tim Stott & Brendan K. O’Rourke
2021. The rules of the game: discursive norms and limits in the field of online art magazines.
Social Semiotics 31:2 ► pp. 324 ff.
Soto-Almela, Jorge & Gema Alcaraz-Mármol
2019. Victims or non-humans: Exploring the semantic preference of refugees in Spanish news articles.
Language & Communication 69 ► pp. 11 ff.
Stubbs, Michael
2009. Memorial Article: John Sinclair (1933–2007).
Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Stubbs, Michael
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 486 ff.
Sun, Hui & Huaizhong Zhu
2021.
In 2021 9th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET),
► pp. 396 ff.
Sung,Il-Ho
2013. Teaching English Near Synonyms Using Corpora..
Studies in English Language & Literature 39:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Tang, Xuri & Gaixiang Liu
2018. Solving contradictions in semantic prosody analysis with prosody concord.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4 ► pp. 437 ff.
Tao, Hongyin
2007. A Corpus-Based Investigation of Absolutely and Related Phenomena in Spoken American English.
Journal of English Linguistics 35:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Tao, Hongyin
2020.
In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315],
► pp. 71 ff.
Tao, Hongyin & Junfei Hu
2019. 基于语料库的“弄”字句的结构、语义和语用考察.
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 162 ff.
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019.
In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,
Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer
2021. The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse.
Intercultural Pragmatics 18:5 ► pp. 605 ff.
Weizman, Elda & Marjut Johansson
2019.
In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307],
► pp. 209 ff.
Wu, Zhong & Lihua Li
2016.
In Semantic Technology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9544],
► pp. 209 ff.
Wulff, Stefanie & Paul Baker
2020.
In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,
► pp. 161 ff.
Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery
2006. Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near Synonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.
Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Yeonchang Jung
2013. A Corpus-Based Study of the Use of the Adjectives Lovely and Cute.
English Language and Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Yeonchang Jung
2014. A Corpus-Based Analysis of English ‘hot+noun’ Expressions: The Lexical Approach.
The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 56:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Zeldes, Amir
2010. Tony McEnery, Richard Xiao & Yukio Tono. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London, New York: Routledge. xx, 386 S.
Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 2:2
Zhang, Dan
2022. Multiculturalism in media representation.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Zhang, Hong
2021. “What do you know about semantic prosody?” Teaching and evaluating implicit knowledge of English with corpus-assisted methods.
English in Education 55:4 ► pp. 337 ff.
Zhang, Wei
2015. The shifting representation of common people in China’s news media.
Journal of Language and Politics 14:2 ► pp. 285 ff.
Zhu, Yifan & Kyung Hye Kim
2020. The individual on the move.
Translation and Interpreting Studies 15:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Zinn, Jens O.
2019.
In Researching Risk and Uncertainty [Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, ],
► pp. 337 ff.
Zinn, Jens O.
2020.
In The UK ‘at Risk’ [Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, ],
► pp. 19 ff.
고언숙
2015. Semantic prosody of the degree adverb nemu: An analysis based on a speech corpus..
Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 21:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
김철규
2013. The Metaphorical Meanings of the Korean Adjective chakhan in Korean Newspapers from 1990 to 2011.
Discourse and Cognition 20:3 ► pp. 89 ff.
김희진 & Lee, Jae-eun
2010. The Authenticity of English Maximizers in High School English Textbooks: The Cases of absolutely, totally, utterly, completely and entirely.
Studies in English Language & Literature 36:1 ► pp. 219 ff.
신수영
2014. A corpus-based study on semantic prosodies of Chinese near-synonym : with daozhi(導致)and yinqi(引起) as an example.
The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China null:36 ► pp. 79 ff.
양재원
2016. A comparative study on amplifier use and preference between Korean English learners and native English speakers.
English Language Teaching 28:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.