Review published in:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 8:2 (2022) ► pp. 289–295
Book review

Alexandra Kinne. Particle Placement in English L1 and L2 Academic Writing
[Corpora and Language in Use 9]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, 2020. 231 pp. ISBN 9782875589859

Reviewed by
| UCLouvain , Louvain-la-Neuve
Published online: 26 January 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.00029.dub
References
Alsop, S., & Nesi, H.
(2009) Issues in the development of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus. Corpora, 4 (1), 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernaisch, T., Gries, S. Th., & Mukherjee, J.
(2014) The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide: A Journal of Varieties of English, 35 (1), 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(2007) Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Linguistics in search of its evidential base (Studies in Generative Grammar) (pp. 75–96). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Callies, M., & Zaytseva, E.
(2013) The Corpus of Academic Learner English (CALE) – A new resource for the study and assessment of advanced language proficiency. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, Moving ahead (Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 1) (pp. 49–59). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2017) Cognition, Corpora, and Computing: Triangulating Research in Usage-Based Language Learning. Language Learning, 67 (S1), 40–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S.
(2015) Learner language. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 418–436). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Gries, S. Th.
(2009) Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grafmiller, J.
(2014) Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language & Linguistics, 18 (3), 471–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grafmiller, J., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
(2018) Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change, 30 (3), 385–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäschke, K., & Plag, I.
(2016) The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (3), 485–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M., Grafmiller, J., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
(2019) Particle placement alternation in EFL learner vs. L1 speech: assessing the similarity of probabilistic grammars. In A. Abel, A. Glaznieks, V. Lyding, & L. Nicolas (Eds.), Widening the Scope of Learner Corpus Research. Selected Papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference (pp. 71–92). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2011) From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 6 (2), 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Gries, S. Th., & Lester, N.
(2018) Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research (pp. 99–120). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Lester, N., & Martinez-Garcia, M. T.
(2014)  That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English. Language and Cognition, 6 (02), 271–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar