Article published in:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 1:1 (2015) ► pp. 5895
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Alexopoulou, Theodora, Marije Michel, Akira Murakami & Detmar Meurers
2017. Task Effects on Linguistic Complexity and Accuracy: A Large-Scale Learner Corpus Analysis Employing Natural Language Processing Techniques. Language Learning 67:S1  pp. 180 ff. Crossref logo
Allaw, Elissa
2019. A learner corpus analysis: Effects of task complexity, task type, and L1 & L2 similarity on propositional and linguistic complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Buyse, Kris, Lydia Fernández Pereda & Katrien Verveckken
2016.  In Spanish Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 78],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Domínguez, Laura
2019. A ‘mixed methods’ approach for investigating aspect in a second language. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 8:1  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Domínguez, Laura, María J Arche & Florence Myles
2017. Spanish Imperfect revisited: Exploring L1 influence in the reassembly of imperfective features onto new L2 forms. Second Language Research 33:4  pp. 431 ff. Crossref logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020.  In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2017. Exploring Learner Language Through Corpora: Comparing and Interpreting Corpus Frequency Information. Language Learning 67:S1  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2019. The Trinity Lancaster Corpus. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Amanda Edmonds & Thomas Metzger
2019. Using Variationism and Learner Corpus Research to Investigate Grammatical Gender Marking in Additional Language Spanish. Language Learning 69:4  pp. 911 ff. Crossref logo
Kreyer, Rolf & Steffen Schaub
2018. The development of phrasal complexity in German intermediate learners of English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 82 ff. Crossref logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Marcus Callies
2018.  In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 419 ff. Crossref logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Ana Díaz-Negrillo
2019. Using learner corpus methods in L2 acquisition research. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1  pp. 82 ff. Crossref logo
Mendikoetxea, Amaya & Cristóbal Lozano
2018. From Corpora to Experiments: Methodological Triangulation in the Study of Word Order at the Interfaces in Adult Late Bilinguals (L2 learners). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:4  pp. 871 ff. Crossref logo
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Jhon A. Cuesta Medina
2018. Can native-speaker corpora help explain L2 acquisition of tense and aspect?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Jhon A. Cuesta Medina
2020.  In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 136 ff. Crossref logo
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole, Rosamond Mitchell & Kevin McManus
2016.  In Spanish Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 78],  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Weiss, Zarah & Detmar Meurers
2021. Analyzing the linguistic complexity of German learner language in a reading comprehension task. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7:1 Crossref logo
Wisniewski, Katrin
2017. Empirical Learner Language and the Levels of theCommon European Framework of Reference. Language Learning 67:S1  pp. 232 ff. Crossref logo
Wisniewski, Katrin
2020. SLA developmental stages in the CEFR-related learner corpus MERLIN. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
2019. Universals and transfer in the acquisition of the progressive aspect: Evidence from L1 Chinese, German, and Spanish learners’ use of the progressive -ing in spoken English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Zhao, Helen & Yasuhiro Shirai
2018. Arabic learners’ acquisition of English past tense morphology. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Zhao, Helen & Yasuhiro Shirai
2020.  In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 112 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y.
1994 “Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 133–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y.
1996 “Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/Creole connection”. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 527–570.Google Scholar
Arche, M.J.
2006Individuals in Time: Tense, Aspect and the Individual/Stage Distinction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D.
2004 “The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study”, Modern Language Journal 88, 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
1998 “Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 471–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2005 “Tracking the elusive Imperfect in adult second language acquisition: Refining the hunt”. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual Inquiries. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 397–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Research design: From text to task”. In M.R. Salabery & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 219–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.W.
1995 “The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect”. TESOL Quarterly 29, 107–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R.
1998Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
2009Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, C.
2013 “Tense or aspect? A review of initial past tense marking and task conditions for beginning classroom learners of Spanish”, Hispania 96(4), 624–639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “From number agreement to the subjunctive: evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish”, Second Language Research. Pre-published version as of 14 July 2014. Available at http://​slr​.sagepub​.com​/content​/early​/2014​/09​/10​/0267658314537291​.abstract (accessed 18 November 2014).Google Scholar
Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M.B. & Zaytseva, E.
2014 “Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency”. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (Eds), Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 71–90.Google Scholar
Camps, J.
2002 “Aspectual distinctions in Spanish as a foreign language: The early stages of oral production”, IRAL 40, 179–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.
1988Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1976Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cordier, C.
2013The Presence, Nature and Role of Formulaic Sequences in English Advanced Learners of French: a Longitudinal Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University, UK.
David, A.
2008 “Vocabulary breadth in French L2 learners”. Language Learning Journal 36, 167–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
David, A., Myles, F., Rogers, V. & Rule, S.
2009 “Lexical development in instructed L2 learners of French: Is there a relationship with morphosyntactic development?”. In H. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, B. Richards & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary Studies in First and Second Language Acquisition: The Interface Between Theory and Application. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 147–163.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Sprouse, R.
2001 “Mental design and (second) language epistemology: adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage”, Second Language Research 17(1), 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M., Mitchell, R. & Myles, F.
2013 “The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 558–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P.
1993 “Tasks and interlanguage performance: An SLA perspective”. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 57–95.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G.
2005Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, P. & Tavakoli, P.
2009 “Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity”, Language Learning 59(4), 866–896. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gil, K.-H. & Marsden, H.
2013 “Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: a feature reassembly account”, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(2), 117–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S. Th
2009 “Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
2002 “A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Learner corpora”. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 259–275.Google Scholar
2009 “The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: a critical evaluation”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasko, V.
2013 “Capturing the dynamics of second language development via Learner Corpus Research: A very long engagement”, Modern Language Journal 97 S1, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A.
2002 “A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb System”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lafford, B.
1996The development of tense/aspect relations in L2 Spanish narratives: evidence to test competing theories. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum 1996, Tucson, Arizona.
Langley, J.
2000Missing! London: Francis Lincoln Limited.Google Scholar
Leclercq, P. & Edmonds, A.
2014 “How to assess L2 proficiency? An overview of proficiency assessment research” In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 3–24.Google Scholar
Liskin-Gasparro, J.
2000 “The use of tense-aspect morphology in Spanish oral narratives: Exploring the perceptions of advanced learners”, Hispania 83, 830–844. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C. & Mendikoetxea, A.
2010 “Interface conditions on postverbal subjects: a corpus study of L2 English”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(4), 475–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Corpus and experimental data: subjects in second language research”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, 313–323.Google Scholar
2013b “Learner corpora and second language acquisition: The design and collection of CEDEL2”. In A. Diaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Gass, S.
2005Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Malvern, D. & Richards, B.
2002 “Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity”, Language Testing 19 (1), 85–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, H.
2009 “Distributive quantifier scope in English-Japanese and Korean-Japanese interlanguage”, Language Acquisition 16, 135–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F. & Littré, D.
2013 “Tracking learners’ progress: Adopting a dual ‘corpus cum experimental data approach’”, The Modern Language Journal 97 S1, 61–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F.
2004 “From data to theory: the over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA”, Transactions of the Philological Society 102(2), 139–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Investigating learner language development with electronic longitudinal corpora: Theoretical and methodological issues”. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 58–72.Google Scholar
Norris, J.M., Brown, J.D., Hudson, T.D. & Bonk, W.
2002 “Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment”, Language Testing 19(4), 395–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. & Ortega, L.
2003 “Defining and measuring SLA”. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London: Blackwell, 716–761. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
1983 “Methods of morpheme quantification: their effect on the interpretation of second language data”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6, 69–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1998Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processbility Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston M. & Brindley, G.
1988 “Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, 217–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, T.
2009 “Verb-second in advanced L2 English: A learner corpus study”. In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 46–59.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M.R.
1999 “The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish”. Applied Linguistics 20, 151–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Tense aspect in verbal morphology”, Hispania 86, 559–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Marking Past Tense in Second Language Acquisition: A Theoretical Model. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M.R. & Lopez-Ortega, N.
1998 “Accurate L2 production across language tasks: Focus on form, focus on meaning, and communicative control”, The Modern Language Journal 82(4), 514–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y.
2004 “A multiple-factor account to form-meaning connection in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology”. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams & S. Rott (Eds.), Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 91–112.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
2005 “How to build a corpus”. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford: Oxbow books, 79–83.Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y.
2007 “The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, universals, or multiple factors”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P. & Foster, P.
2011 “Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output”, Language Learning 61, 37–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J. & Ortega, L.
2014 “ ‘Repeat as much as you can’: Elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2French”. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 143–166.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
1967Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yu, G.
2010 “Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances”. Applied Linguistics 31 (2), 236–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar