The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research
Nicole Tracy-Ventura | University of South Florida
Florence Myles | University of Essex
This cross-sectional study investigates task variability focusing on the use of Spanish past tense morphology in a spoken learner corpus. Sixty L2 learners of Spanish (English L1) from three different proficiency levels (20 per group) and fifteen native speakers completed three communicative tasks (a guided interview, a picture-based narrative, and a historical figures description) and an experimental task, all designed to investigate the acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 Spanish. Data were transcribed in CHAT, and analysed and coded using a specially created interactive coding program that works in combination with the CLAN program (MacWhinney 2000). Results demonstrate significant differences in the emergence and accurate use of past tense morphology across tasks. An additional analysis showed that the less controlled tasks encouraged few instances of more advanced features, suggesting that not all task types are equally successful at eliciting the range of tense-aspect morphological contrasts theoretically relevant for SLA research on tense and aspect.
Keywords: tense and aspect, L2 Spanish, Aspect Hypothesis, oral learner corpora, task variability
Published online: 23 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.03tra
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.03tra
Cited by
Cited by 24 other publications
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Marije Michel, Akira Murakami & Detmar Meurers
2017. Task Effects on Linguistic Complexity and Accuracy: A Large-Scale Learner Corpus Analysis Employing Natural Language Processing Techniques.
Language Learning 67:S1 ► pp. 180 ff. 
Allaw, Elissa
2019. A learner corpus analysis: Effects of task complexity, task type, and L1 & L2 similarity on propositional and linguistic complexity
.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Buyse, Kris, Lydia Fernández Pereda & Katrien Verveckken
2016.
In Spanish Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 78],
► pp. 143 ff.
Domínguez, Laura
2019. A ‘mixed methods’ approach for investigating aspect in a second language.
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Domínguez, Laura, María J Arche & Florence Myles
2017. Spanish Imperfect revisited: Exploring L1 influence in the reassembly of imperfective features onto new L2 forms.
Second Language Research 33:4 ► pp. 431 ff.
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020.
In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],
► pp. 2 ff.
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2017. Exploring Learner Language Through Corpora: Comparing and Interpreting Corpus Frequency Information.
Language Learning 67:S1 ► pp. 130 ff.
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2019. The Trinity Lancaster Corpus.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2 ► pp. 126 ff.
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Amanda Edmonds & Thomas Metzger
2019. Using Variationism and Learner Corpus Research to Investigate Grammatical Gender Marking in Additional Language Spanish.
Language Learning 69:4 ► pp. 911 ff.
Kreyer, Rolf & Steffen Schaub
2018. The development of phrasal complexity in German intermediate learners of English.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
Lozano, Cristóbal & Marcus Callies
2018.
In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,
► pp. 419 ff.
Lozano, Cristóbal & Ana Díaz-Negrillo
2019. Using learner corpus methods in L2 acquisition
research.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
López-Beltrán, Priscila, Michael A Johns, Paola E Dussias, Cristóbal Lozano & Alfonso Palma
2021. The effects of information structure in the processing of word order variation in the second language.
Second Language Research ► pp. 026765832199246 ff.
Mendikoetxea, Amaya & Cristóbal Lozano
2018. From Corpora to Experiments: Methodological Triangulation in the Study of Word Order at the Interfaces in Adult Late Bilinguals (L2 learners).
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:4 ► pp. 871 ff.
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Jhon A. Cuesta Medina
2018. Can native-speaker corpora help explain L2 acquisition of tense and aspect?.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 277 ff.
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Jhon A. Cuesta Medina
2020.
In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],
► pp. 136 ff.
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole, Rosamond Mitchell & Kevin McManus
2016.
In Spanish Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 78],
► pp. 117 ff.
Weiss, Zarah & Detmar Meurers
2021. Analyzing the linguistic complexity of German learner language in a reading comprehension task.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Wisniewski, Katrin
2017. Empirical Learner Language and the Levels of theCommon European Framework of Reference.
Language Learning 67:S1 ► pp. 232 ff.
Wisniewski, Katrin
2020. SLA developmental stages in the CEFR-related learner corpus MERLIN.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
2021. Universals and transfer in the acquisition of the progressive aspect: Evidence from L1 Chinese, German, and Spanish learners’ use of the progressive -ing in spoken English
.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Zhao, Helen & Yasuhiro Shirai
2018. Arabic learners’ acquisition of English past tense morphology.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Zhao, Helen & Yasuhiro Shirai
2020.
In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],
► pp. 112 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
References
References
Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y.
1994 “Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 133–156. 
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y.
1996 “Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/Creole connection”. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 527–570.
Arche, M.J.
2006 Individuals in Time: Tense, Aspect and the Individual/Stage Distinction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ayoun, D.
2004 “The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study”, Modern Language Journal 88, 31–55.
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
1998 “Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 471–508.
2000 Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Malden: Blackwell.
2005 “Tracking the elusive Imperfect in adult second language acquisition: Refining the hunt”. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual Inquiries. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 397–419.
2013 “Research design: From text to task”. In M.R. Salabery & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 219–269.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.W.
1995 “The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect”. TESOL Quarterly 29, 107–131.
Biber, D.
1988 Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R.
1998 Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
2009 Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonilla, C.
2013 “Tense or aspect? A review of initial past tense marking and task conditions for beginning classroom learners of Spanish”, Hispania 96(4), 624–639.
2014 “From number agreement to the subjunctive: evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish”, Second Language Research. Pre-published version as of 14 July 2014. Available at http://slr.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/10/0267658314537291.abstract (accessed 18 November 2014).
Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M.B. & Zaytseva, E.
2014 “Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency”. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (Eds), Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 71–90.
Camps, J.
2002 “Aspectual distinctions in Spanish as a foreign language: The early stages of oral production”, IRAL 40, 179–210.
Cohen, J.
1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Comrie, B.
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cordier, C.
2013 The Presence, Nature and Role of Formulaic Sequences in English Advanced Learners of French: a Longitudinal Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University, UK.
David, A.
2008 “Vocabulary breadth in French L2 learners”. Language Learning Journal 36, 167–180.
David, A., Myles, F., Rogers, V. & Rule, S.
2009 “Lexical development in instructed L2 learners of French: Is there a relationship with morphosyntactic development?”. In H. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, B. Richards & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary Studies in First and Second Language Acquisition: The Interface Between Theory and Application. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 147–163.
Dekydtspotter, L. & Sprouse, R.
2001 “Mental design and (second) language epistemology: adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage”, Second Language Research 17(1), 1–35.
Dominguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M., Mitchell, R. & Myles, F.
2013 “The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 558–577.
Duff, P.
1993 “Tasks and interlanguage performance: An SLA perspective”. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 57–95.
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G.
2005 Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foster, P. & Tavakoli, P.
2009 “Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity”, Language Learning 59(4), 866–896.
Gil, K.-H. & Marsden, H.
2013 “Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: a feature reassembly account”, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(2), 117–149.
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S. Th
2009 “Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1), 1–26.
Granger, S.
2002 “A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–33.
2008 “Learner corpora”. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 259–275.
2009 “The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: a critical evaluation”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–32.
Hasko, V.
2013 “Capturing the dynamics of second language development via Learner Corpus Research: A very long engagement”, Modern Language Journal 97 S1, 1–10.
Housen, A.
2002 “A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb System”. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77–116.
Lafford, B.
1996 The development of tense/aspect relations in L2 Spanish narratives: evidence to test competing theories. Paper presented at
Second Language Research Forum 1996, Tucson, Arizona.
Langley, J.
2000 Missing! London: Francis Lincoln Limited.
Leclercq, P. & Edmonds, A.
2014 “How to assess L2 proficiency? An overview of proficiency assessment research” In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 3–24.
Liskin-Gasparro, J.
2000 “The use of tense-aspect morphology in Spanish oral narratives: Exploring the perceptions of advanced learners”, Hispania 83, 830–844.
Lozano, C. & Mendikoetxea, A.
2010 “Interface conditions on postverbal subjects: a corpus study of L2 English”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(4), 475–497.
2013a “Corpus and experimental data: subjects in second language research”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, 313–323.
2013b “Learner corpora and second language acquisition: The design and collection of CEDEL2”. In A. Diaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–100.
Mackey, A. & Gass, S.
2005 Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B.
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Malvern, D. & Richards, B.
2002 “Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity”, Language Testing 19 (1), 85–104.
Marsden, H.
2009 “Distributive quantifier scope in English-Japanese and Korean-Japanese interlanguage”, Language Acquisition 16, 135–177.
Meunier, F. & Littré, D.
2013 “Tracking learners’ progress: Adopting a dual ‘corpus cum experimental data approach’”, The Modern Language Journal 97 S1, 61–76.
Myles, F.
2004 “From data to theory: the over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA”, Transactions of the Philological Society 102(2), 139–168.
2008 “Investigating learner language development with electronic longitudinal corpora: Theoretical and methodological issues”. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 58–72.
Norris, J.M., Brown, J.D., Hudson, T.D. & Bonk, W.
2002 “Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment”, Language Testing 19(4), 395–418.
Norris, J. & Ortega, L.
2003 “Defining and measuring SLA”. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London: Blackwell, 716–761.
Pica, T.
1983 “Methods of morpheme quantification: their effect on the interpretation of second language data”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6, 69–78.
Pienemann, M.
1998 Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processbility Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., Johnston M. & Brindley, G.
1988 “Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, 217–224.
Rankin, T.
2009 “Verb-second in advanced L2 English: A learner corpus study”. In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 46–59.
Salaberry, M.R.
1999 “The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish”. Applied Linguistics 20, 151–178.
2003 “Tense aspect in verbal morphology”, Hispania 86, 559–573.
2008 Marking Past Tense in Second Language Acquisition: A Theoretical Model. London: Continuum.
Salaberry, M.R. & Lopez-Ortega, N.
1998 “Accurate L2 production across language tasks: Focus on form, focus on meaning, and communicative control”, The Modern Language Journal 82(4), 514–532.
Shirai, Y.
2004 “A multiple-factor account to form-meaning connection in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology”. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams & S. Rott (Eds.), Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 91–112.
Sinclair, J.
2005 “How to build a corpus”. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford: Oxbow books, 79–83.
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y.
2007 “The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, universals, or multiple factors”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 1–38.
Tavakoli, P. & Foster, P.
2011 “Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output”, Language Learning 61, 37–72.
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J. & Ortega, L.
2014 “ ‘Repeat as much as you can’: Elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2French”. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 143–166.
Vendler, Z.
1967 Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Yu, G.
2010 “Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances”. Applied Linguistics 31 (2), 236–259.