Article published in:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 6:1 (2020) ► pp. 3871
References

References

Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R.
2018Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. & Egbert, J.
(Eds.) 2016Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus-linguistic research. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15, 133–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Gray, B.
2010Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
2013Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking responses on the TOEFL iBT. (TOEFL iBT Research Report No. 19). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Gray, B.
2011/2016Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15, 223–250. [Reprinted 2016 in the 20th Anniversary Collection, English Language and Linguistics.]Google Scholar
2016Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
2011Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Pay attention to the phrasal structures: Going beyond T-units. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 192–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B. & Staples, S.
2016Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639–668. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
1999The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
[ p. 68 ]
Biber, D., Gray, B., Staples, S., & Egbert, J.
(to appear). Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 writing research: Linguistic description versus predictive measurement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.
Biber, D., Reppen, R., & Staples, S.
(2017) Exploring the relationship between TOEFL iBT scores and disciplinary writing performance. TESOL Quarterly 51(4), 948-960. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E.
2011Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: syntactic complexity and genre differentiation. Reading and Writing, 24, 183–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bulté, B. & Housen, A.
2014Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 42–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 147–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M.
2006Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connor-Linton, J. & Polio, C.
2014Comparing perspectives on L2 writing: Multiple analyses of a common corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S.
2014Does writing development equal writing quality?: A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 66–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P.
2016A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 166–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J.
2015Sub-register and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20, 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S.
2012A longitudinal study of complexity, accuracy and fluency variation in second language development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, and I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in SLA (pp. 277–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E. & Weigle, S.
2014Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D.
2018Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40, 646–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.
2015Linguistic Variation in Research Articles: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., Staples, S. & Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
2019Developmental complexity in BAWE: comparing L1 and L2 English writers. Presentation at 10th International Corpus Linguistics 2019 Conference. Cardiff, Wales.
[ p. 69 ]
Gunnarsson, C.
2012The development of complexity, accuracy and fluency in the written production of L2 French. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, and I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in SLA (pp. 247–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1989Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R.
1984Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kass, R. E. & Raftery, A. E.
1995Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A., Oon, S. P., & Storch, N.
2015What happens to ESL students’ writing after three years of study at an English medium university? Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 39–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreyer, R. & Schaub, S.
2018The development of phrasal complexity in German intermediate learners of English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4(1), 82–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A.
2018Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine-Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 333–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
2006The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 24(7), 590–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L.
2008Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, A. C. L.
2018Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFLwriters at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 35, 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., Gardner, S., Thompson, P., & Wickens, P.
2008–2010The British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
2009Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
2012Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. In Kortmann, B., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (Eds.)., Linguistic complexity: second language acquisition, indigenization, contact (pp. 127–155). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H.
2008The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. & Iberri-Shea, G.
2005Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, J. & Musgrave, J.
2014Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 70 ]
Polat, B. & Kim, Y.
2012Dynamics of Complexity and Accuracy: A Longitudinal Case Study of Advanced Untutored Development. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 184–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spoelman, M. & Verspoor, M.
2010Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staples, S., Biber, D., & Reppen, R.
2018Using Corpus-Based Register Analysis to Explore Authenticity of High-Stakes Language Exams: A Register Comparison of TOEFL iBT and Disciplinary Writing Tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 310–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
2016Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33, 149–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Crawford, W., & Wetzel, D. Z.
2013What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 420–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M.
2008Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, R.
1960Nominal and verbal style. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 213–220). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yan, X. & Staples, S.
(2019, early view) Fitting MD analysis in an argument-based validity framework for writing assessment: Explanation and generalization inferences for the ECPE. Language Testing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S.
2015Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 71 ]