Article published in:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 6:1 (2020) ► pp. 137
References
Abrahamsson, N.
2013 “Developmental sequences”. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition. London: Routledge, 173–177.Google Scholar
Abel, A., Nicolas, L., Wisniewski, K., Boyd, A. & Hana, J.
2014 “A Trilingual Learner Corpus illustrating European Reference Levels”, Ricognizioni. Rivista di Lingue e Letterature e Culture Moderne 2 (1), 111–126. http://​www​.ojs​.unito​.it​/index​.php​/ricognizioni​/index
Alderson, J. C.
2005Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2007 “The CEFR and the need for more research”, The Modern Language Journal 91(4), 659–663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Language testing-informed SLA? SLA-informed language testing?”. In I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: intersections between SLA and language testing research. http://​eurosla​.org​/monographs​/EM01​/EM01home​.html, 239–248.
Alexopoulou, T., Michel, M., Murakami, A. & Meurers, D.
2017 “Task Effects on Linguistic Complexity and Accuracy: A Large-Scale Learner Corpus Analysis Employing Natural Language Processing Techniques”, Language Learning 67(S1), 180–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. & Cohen, A.
(Eds.) 1998Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A.
2010Language Testing in Practice. Developing Language Assessment and Justifying their Use in the Real World. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bärenfänger, O., & Tschirner, E.
2012Assessing Evidence of Validity of Assigning CEFR Ratings to the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) and the Oral Proficiency Interview by computer (OPIc) (Technical Report 2012-US-PUB-1). Leipzig: ITT.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, U.
2006 “When Swedes begin to learn German: from V2 to V2”, Second Language Research 22(4), 443–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boss, B.
2004 “Wann ich habe Freizeit, ich koche gern. Zum Erwerb der deutschen Inversion und Nebensatzwortstellung durch australische Studierende”, Deutsch als Fremdsprache 41(1), 28–32.Google Scholar
Callies, M. & Götz, S.
(Eds.) 2015Learner corpora in language testing and assessment. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Callies, M. & Paquot, M.
2015 “Learner corpus research: An interdisciplinary field on the move”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M. B. & Zaytseva, E.
2014 “Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency”. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency. Perspectives from SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 71–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H.
1984 “The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development”. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 219–242.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. M. & Pienemann, M.
1983Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (Ed.)
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Deygers, B.
2019 “The CEFR Companion Volume: Between Research-Based Policy and Policy-Based Research”, Applied Linguistics, 1–7.Google Scholar
Diehl, E., Christen, H. & Leuenberger, S.
2000Grammatikunterricht: Alles für der Katz? Untersuchungen zum Zweitsprachenerwerb Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
1989 “Are Classroom and Naturalistic Acquisition the Same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3), 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Glaboniat, M., Müller, M., Rusch, P., Schmitz, H. & Wertenschlag, L.
2005Profile Deutsch. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, J. & Ågren, M.
2013 “Stages of Processability and Levels of Proficiency in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. The Case of L3 French”. In A. Flyman-Mattsson & C. Norrby (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Use in Multilingual Contexts. Theory and Practice Lund: Lund University, 28–38.Google Scholar
Grießhaber, W.
2012 “Die Profilanalyse”. In B. Ahrenholz (Ed.), Einblicke in die Zweitspracherwerbsforschung und ihre methodischen Verfahren. Berlin u.a.: De Gruyter, 173–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Die Profilanalyse für Deutsch als Diagnoseinstrument zur Sprachförderung. Online: http://​www​.uni​-due​.de​/imperia​/md​/content​/prodaz​/griesshaber​_profilanalyse​_deutsch​.pdf
Gunnewiek, L.
2000Sequenzen und Konsequenzen: zur Entwicklung niederländischer Lerner im Deutschen als Fremdsprache. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Haberzettl, S.
2005Der Erwerb der Verbstellungsregeln in der Zweitsprache Deutsch durch Kinder mit russischer und türkischer Muttersprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagenfeld, K.
2016 “Psychometric approaches to language testing and linguistic profiling – A complementary relationship?” In J.-U. Keßler, A. Lenzing, & M. Liebner (Eds.), Developing and Assessing Second Language Grammars across Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 135–162.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G.
2001 “Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(1), 85–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hancke, J.
2013Automatic Prediction of CEFR Proficiency Levels Based on Linguistic Features of Learner Language. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen. Unpublished MA thesis available under http://​merlin​-platform​.eu​/docs​/MA​-Thesis​-Julia​-Hancke​.pdf
Harrison, J. & Barker, F.
2015English Profile in Practice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. & Buttery, P.
2010 “Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations”, English Profile Journal 11, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. & Filipovíc, L.
2012Criterial features in L2 English: Specifying the reference levels of the Common European Framework. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Helbig, G. & Buscha, J.
2001Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J.
2007 “The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency”, The Modern Language Journal 91(4), 663–667. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Alderson, J. C. & Schoonen, R.
2010 “Developmental stages in second-language acquisition and levels of second-language proficiency: Are there links between them?” In I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: intersections between SLA and language testing research. http://​eurosla​.org​/monographs​/EM01​/EM01home​.html, 11–20.
HZSK
2010 “HAMATAC – the Hamburg MapTask Corpus.” Archived in Hamburger Zentrum für Sprachkorpora. Version 0.3. Publication date 2010-09-16. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/11022​/0000​-0000​-6330​-A
Jansen, L.
2008 “Acquisition of German Word Order in Tutored Learners: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Wider Theoretical Context”, Language Learning 58(1), 185–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M.
1981 “On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2), 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, G.
2007 “An Operational Definition of the Emergence Criterion”, Applied Linguistics 28(3), 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1981Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
1989 “Is Language Teachable? Psycholinguistic Experiments and Hypotheses”, Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Language processing and second language development. Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) 2005Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 An Outline of Processability Theory and Its Relationship to Other Approaches to SLA Language Learning 65 1 123 151 Crossref
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. & Brindley, G.
1988 “Constructing an Acquisition-Based Procedure for Second Language Assessment”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10(2), 217–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reznicek, M., Walter, M., Schmidt, K., Lüdeling, A., Hirschmann, H., Krummes, C. & Andreas, T.
Tono, Y.
2012 “International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage: Project overview and a case study on the acquisition of new verb co-occurrence patterns”. In Y. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi, & M. Minegishi (Eds.), Developmental and crosslinguistic perspectives in learner corpus research. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 27–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N. & Myles, F.
2015 “The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 58–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tschirner, E. & Meerholz-Härle, B.
2001 “Processability Theory: Eine empirische Untersuchung”. In K. Aguado & C. Riemer (Eds.), Wege und Ziele: Zur Theorie, Empirie und Praxis des Deutschen als Fremdsprache (und anderer Fremdsprachen). Festschrift für Gert Henrici. Hohengehren: Schneider, 155–175.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, N.
2012 “The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study”, The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 576–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) “KANDEL: A developmental corpus of learner German”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2(1), 102–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vyatkina, N., Hirschmann, H. & Golcher, F.
2015 “Syntactic modification at early stages of L2 German writing development: A longitudinal learner corpus study”, New developments in the study of L2 writing complexity 291, 28–50.Google Scholar
Weiß, Z.
2017Using Measures of Linguistic Complexity to Assess German L2 Proficiency in Learner Corpora under Consideration of Task-Effects. Unpublished MA thesis. http://​www​.sfs​.uni​-tuebingen​.de​/~zweiss/
Wisniewski, K.
2017a “The Empirical Validity of the Common European Framework of Reference Scales. An Exemplary Study for the Vocabulary and Fluency Scales in a Language Testing Context”, Applied Linguistics 39(6), 933–959. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “Empirical Learner Language and the Levels of the Common European Framework of Reference”, Language Learning 67(S1), 232–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Grammatische Korrektheit und L2-Kompetenz: Eine Lernerkorpus-Studie”, Deutsch als Fremdsprache 31, 131–142.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Wisniewski, Katrin
2021. „Ist es B2-Niveau genug?“. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2021:75  pp. 364 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.