Article published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus ResearchVol. 2:1 (2016) ► pp.31–67
A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels
Findings from corpus-based and psycholinguistic research have highlighted the importance of acquiring productive knowledge of English phraseology for L2 learners. Many studies exploring this facet of language learning have investigated the use of predominantly fixed multi-word sequences by advanced learners in academic settings and compared their use against that of native-speaking writers. More recent studies have attempted to explore the differences between learners’ use of multi-word sequences across proficiency levels. The current study aims to add to this growing body of literature. It examines the use of phrase-frames by L1 German learners of English as a Foreign Language at five different proficiency levels represented in the EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT). The most frequent phrase-frames in each level are analyzed according to both quantitative and qualitative characteristics. The results revealed that, at higher proficiency levels, p-frames in learner texts are more variable, less predictable, and more functionally complex.
Keywords: German EFL learners, phrase-frames, L2 phraseology, usage-based SLA
References
Ädel, A. & Erman, B
2012 “Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of english: A lexical bundles approach”, English for Specific Purposes 311, 81–92. 
Alexopoulou, T., Geertzen, J., Korhonen, A. & Meurers, D
2015 “Exploring big educational learner corpora for SLA research: Perspectives on relative clauses”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 96–129.
Altenberg, B
1998 “On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations”. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–122.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortes, V
2004 “If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks”, Applied Linguistics 25(3), 371–405.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Bybee, J
2008 “Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition”. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 216–236.
Chen, Y.H. & Baker, P
2010 “Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing”, Language Learning and Technology 14(2), 30–49.
2013 “Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2, and C1”, Applied Linguistics Advance Access published December 5, 2014.
Council of Europe
2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, M
2008 The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. Available at [URL]
DeCock, S
2000 “Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing”. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 51–68.
DeCock, S., Granger, S., Leech, G. & McEnery, T
1998 “An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer. London: Longman, 67–79.
Ellis, N.C
2002 “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 241, 143–188.
2012 “Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 321, 17–44.
Ellis, N.C., Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C
2008 “Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL”, TESOL Quarterly 42(3), 375–396.
Erman, B. & Warren, B
2000 “The idiom principle and the open choice principle”, Text 201, 29–62.
Eskildsen, S.W
2009 “Constructing another language - Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition”, Applied Linguistics 30(3), 335–357.
2015 “What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions”, Language Learning 65(1), 33–62.
Fletcher, W.H
2002-2007 KfNgram. Annapolis, MD: USNA.
Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T. & Korhonen, A
2013 “Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCamDat)”. Proceedings of the
31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF)
.
Granger, S
1998 “Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae”. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 145–160.
Gray, B. & Biber, D
2013 “Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1), 109–135.
Jiang, N. & Nekrasova, T
2007 “The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers”, The Modern Language Journal 91(3), 433–445.
Jukneviciene, R
2009 “Lexical bundles in learner language: Lithuanian learners vs. native speakers”, KALBOTYRA 61(3), 61–72.
Leńko-Szymańska, A
2014 “The acquisition of formulaic language by EFL learners: A cross-sectional and cross-linguistic perspective”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(2), 225–251.
Li, P., Cadierno, T. & Eskildsen, S.W
2014 “Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation”, The Modern Language Journal 98(2), 612–628.
Mellow, J.D
2006 “The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses”, Applied Linguistics 27(4), 645–670.
Myles, F., Hooper, J. & Mitchell, R
1998 “Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning”, Language Learning 48(3), 323–363.
Nekrasova, T.M
2009 “English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles”, Language Learning 59(3), 647–686.
Paquot, M. & Granger, S
2012 “Formulaic language in learner corpora”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 321, 130–149.
Pawley, A. & Syder, F.H
1983 “Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency”. In J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication. London: Longman, 191–225.
Renouf, A. & Sinclair, J
1991 “Collocational frameworks in English”. In B. Altenberg & K. Aijmer (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honor of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 128–143.
Römer, U
2009 “The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 71, 140–162.
2010 “Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews”, English Text Constructions 3(1), 95–119.
Siyanova-Chantura, A. & Martinez, R
2015 “The idiom principle revisited”, Applied Linguistics 36(5), 549–569.
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D. & McClair, A
2013 “Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121, 214–225.
Stubbs, M
2007 “An example of frequent english phraseology: Distributions, structures, and functions”. In R. Facchinetti (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics 25 Years on. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 89–105.
Svartvik, J
1990 The London Corpus of Spoken English. Lund: Lund University Press.
Vidakovic, I. & Barker, F
2010 “Use of words and multi-word units in skills for life writing examinations”, Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes 411, 7–14.
Yuldashev, A., Fernandez, J. & Thorne, S.L
2013 “Second language learners’ contiguous and discontiguous multi-word unit use over time”, The Modern Language Journal 97(S1), 31–45.
Cited by
Cited by 19 other publications
Brůhová, Gabriela & Kateřina Vašků
2021. Lexical Bundles Ending in that in Academic Writing by Czech Learners and Native Speakers of English. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :30/2 ► pp. 33 ff. 
Casal, J. Elliott & Jungwan Yoon
2023. Frame-based formulaic features in L2 writing pedagogy: Variants, functions, and student writer perceptions in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 71 ► pp. 102 ff.
Geluso, Joe
2022. Grammatical and functional characteristics of preposition-based phrase frames in English argumentative essays by L1 English and Spanish speakers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 55 ► pp. 101072 ff.
Golparvar, Seyyed Ehsan & Elyas Barabadi
2020. Key phrase frames in the discussion section of research articles of higher education. Lingua 236 ► pp. 102804 ff.
He, Mengyu, Leng Hong Ang & Kim Hua Tan
2021. A corpus-driven analysis of phrase frames in research articles on business management. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Hsu, Chan-Chia
2020. Exploring recurrent frames in written Chinese. Corpora 15:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
Juknevičienė, Rita & Łukasz Grabowski
2018. Comparing Formulaicity of Learner Writing through Phrase-Frames: A Corpus-Driven Study of Lithuanian and Polish EFL Student Writing. Research in Language 16:3 ► pp. 303 ff.
Larsson, Tove, Randi Reppen & Tülay Dixon
2022. A phraseological study of highlighting strategies in novice and expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 60 ► pp. 101179 ff.
Li, Yuan Ke & An Bang Fang
2022. Synergistic effects of multiword sequences structure, function, frequency and association on raters’ evaluations of essay quality. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Liu, Chen-Yu & Hao-Jan Howard Chen
2022. A phraseological exploration of university lectures through phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 58 ► pp. 101135 ff.
Liu, Luda, Feng (Kevin) Jiang & Zhongquan Du
2023. Figure legends of scientific research articles: Rhetorical moves and phrase frames. English for Specific Purposes 70 ► pp. 86 ff.
Nuttall, Chris
2021. Profiling lexical frame use in NSF grant proposal abstracts. Applied Corpus Linguistics 1:3 ► pp. 100009 ff.
O'Keeffe, Anne & Geraldine Mark
2022. Principled pattern curation to guide data-driven learning design. Applied Corpus Linguistics 2:3 ► pp. 100028 ff.
Ren, Junqiang
2022. A comparative study of the phrase frames used in the essays of native and nonnative English students. Lingua 274 ► pp. 103376 ff.
Römer, Ute & Cynthia M. Berger
2019. OBSERVING THE EMERGENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:5 ► pp. 1089 ff.
Tan, Yi & Ute Römer
2022. Using phrase-frames to trace the language development of L1 Chinese learners of English. System 108 ► pp. 102844 ff.
Vašků, Kateřina, Gabriela Brůhová & Denisa Šebestová
2019. Phraseological Sequences Ending in of in L2 Novice Academic Writing. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11755], ► pp. 431 ff.
Xia, Detong, Yudi Chen & Hye K. Pae
2023. Lexical and grammatical collocations in beginning and intermediate L2 argumentative essays: a bigram study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1421 ff.
Xia, Detong, Mark A. Sulzer & Hye K. Pae
2023. Phrase-frames in business emails: a contrast between learners of business English and working professionals. Text & Talk 0:0
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.