Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors, Sandra Götz and Samantha Laporte
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2] 2016
► pp. 205–228

The innovative progressive aspect of Black South African English

The role of language proficiency and normative processes

| North-West University
| Macquarie University & North-West University

Conflicting findings are reported for New Englishes and Learner Englishes: similarities are identified mainly on psycholinguistic grounds and differences on sociolinguistic grounds. This article offers an analysis of the progressive form in Black South African English, in which the interaction between gradual increases in proficiency and normative interventions by explicit feedback and editing of published texts is examined to establish the route towards conventionalisation of innovative features. The results indicate that one innovative feature, the extension of the progressive to longer time spans, becomes established as a feature of the variety, but other potential innovations gradually disappear under normative influence and with increased proficiency. Innovations are likely to be accepted if they are insufficiently salient to be targeted for normative correction and sufficiently present in the written and spoken input to become entrenched in the grammatical representations of learners as they turn into advanced users of the New English.

Keywords: editing, normative processes, Black South African English, progressive, conventionalisation, innovation, feedback
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.04van
References
Axelsson, M.W. & Hahn, A
2001 “The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English – A corpus-based study”, ICAME Journal 251, 5–30.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, A
1998 “Torn between the norms: Innovations in world Englishes”, World Englishes 17(1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bybee, J
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W
2000 Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2012 Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Department of Higher Education and Training
2014 Statistics on Post-School Education and Training in South Africa 20121. Pretoria: DHET.Google Scholar
Edwards, A
2014 “The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum”, World Englishes 33(2), 173–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. & Laporte, S
2015 “Outer and expanding circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels”, English World-Wide 36(2), 135–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S
2011 “From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Götz, S. & Schilk, M
2011 “Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English for advanced German learners”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Deshors, S.C
2015 “EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 130–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R
2002 “The verb”. In R. Huddleston & G.K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M. & Vogel, K
2011 “Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes – fact or fiction?” In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 145–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K
(Eds.) 2012 The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranich, S
2010 The Progressive in Modern English: A corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, H. & Van Rooy, B
2016 “Editorial practice and conventionalised innovations in New Englishes: The progressive in Black South African English”. World Englishes. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Laporte, S
2012 “Mind the gap! Bridge between world Englishes and learner Englishes in the making”, English Text Construction 5(2), 264–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lunkenheimer, K
2012 “Typological profile: L2 varieties.” In B. Kortmann & K. Lunkenheimer (Eds.), The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 844–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, C
2006 Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation, and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, C
2007 “Standards and norms in interactions across second language Englishes: The case of South Africa.” In S. Kolk-Birke & J. Lippert (Eds.), Anglistentag 2006 Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftliche Verlag Trier, 331–340.Google Scholar
2012 Interactions Across Englishes: Linguistic Choices in Local and International Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R
2012 “Black South African English”. In B. Kortmann & K. Lunkenheimer (Eds.), The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 493–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R.M
2008 World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minow, V
2010 Variation in the Grammar of Black South African English. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Paulasto, H
2014 “Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes”, English World-Wide 35(3), 247–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piotrowska, C.M
2015 A Diachronic Analysis of the Progressive Aspect in Black South African English. Unpublished M.A. dissertation. North-West University.Google Scholar
Pretorius, E.J. & Mampuru, D.M
2007 “Playing football without a ball: Language, reading and academic performance in a high-poverty school”, Journal of Research in Reading 30(1), 38–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pretorius, R.S
1997 Auxiliary Verbs as Subcategory of the Verb in Tswana. Unpublished PhD thesis. Potchefstroom University.Google Scholar
Ranta, E
2006 “The ‘attractive’ progressive - Why use the -ing form in English as a Lingua Franca?”, Nordic Journal of English Studies 5(2), 95–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E
2007 Post-Colonial Englishes: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Exploring the interface between world Englishes and second language acquisition – and implications for English as a lingua franca”, Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 1(1), 57–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M
2015 Wordsmith Tools 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sharma, D
2009 “Typological diversity in new Englishes”, English World-Wide 30(2), 170–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siebers, L
2013 Morphosyntax in Black South African English: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Xhosa English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, B
2006 “The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English”, World Englishes 25(1), 37–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Progressive aspect and stative verbs in Outer Circle Varieties”, World Englishes 33(2), 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Botha, Werner, Bertus Rooy & Susan Coetzee‐van Rooy
2021. South African Englishes: A contemporary bibliography. World Englishes 40:1 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert, Bertus van Rooy & Ulrike Gut
2019. Chapter 1.2. Corpus-based research on English in Africa. In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88], ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Kotze, Haidee
2019. Does Editing Matter? Editorial Work, Endonormativity and Convergence in Written Englishes in South Africa. In English in Multilingual South Africa, ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
KRUGER, HAIDEE & BERTUS VAN ROOY
2017. Editorial practice and the progressive in Black South African English. World Englishes 36:1 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Law, Melanie A. & Haidee Kotze
2020. Gender, Writing and Editing in South African Englishes. In Gender in World Englishes, ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Mesthrie, Rajend
2020. Contact and African Englishes. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
van den Doel, Rias
2017. Alison Edwards. 2016.English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes. Varieties of English around the World. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 38:3 ► pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
van Rooy, Bertus
2019. Learner Corpus Research in South Africa (1989–2019). Language Matters 50:3 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
van Rooy, Bertus
2019. English in Africa. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
2021. Universals and transfer in the acquisition of the progressive aspect: Evidence from L1 Chinese, German, and Spanish learners’ use of the progressive-ingin spoken English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:2 ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
2023. A corpus-based study of the acquisition of the English progressive by L1 Chinese learners: from prototypical activities to marked statives. Linguistics 61:3 ► pp. 749 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.