Article published in:
Natural language processing for learner corpus research
Edited by Kristopher Kyle
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7:1] 2021
► pp. 5382
Abbot-Smith, K., Chang, F., Rowland, C., Ferguson, H., & Pine, J.
(2017) Do two and three year old children use an incremental first-NP-as-agent bias to process active transitive and passive sentences?: A permutation analysis. PloS one, 12(10), e0186129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bang, D.-S.
(2014) hankwuke kokup haksupcauy ssukiey nathananun hancae olyu pwunsek [A study of sino-Korean errors found in advanced Korean learners]. kwukhakyenkwulonchong, 141, 1–21.Google Scholar
Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S.
(2014) Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 261, 28–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
(2004) If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birjandi, P., Maftoon, P., & Rahemi, J.
(2011) VanPatten’s processing instruction: Links to the acquisition of English passive structure by Iranian EFL learners. European Journal of Science Research, 64(4), 598–609.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., & Tomasello, M.
(1999) Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 351, 29–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, S., & Park, Y.
(2018) Sheffield tayhakkyo hankwuke haksupcauy cakmwun thukseng pwunsek [Characteristics of Korean language writing by students at the University of Sheffield]. cakmwunyenkwu, 381, 149–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Y.
(2019) The effects of writing prompt types on L2 learners’ writing strategy use and performance. Studies in English Language & Literature, 45(3), 295–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, B.-S.
(2018) oykwukin yuhaksaynguy kwanhyengcel silhyen yangsang yenkwu – cakmwun calyolul cwungsimulo [A study on the aspects of the Korean adnominal clause of overseas students – focused on using writing]. hanmincokemwunhak, 791, 61–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. D., & Palmer, M.
(2011, October). Statistical dependency parsing in Korean: From corpus generation to automatic parsing. In D. Seddah, R. Tsarfaty, & J. Foster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically-Rich Languages (pp. 1–11). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Choo, M., & Kwak, H.-Y.
(2008) Using Korean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chun, J., Han, N.-R., Hwang, J. D., & Choi, J. D.
(2018) Building Universal Dependency Treebanks in Korean. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, K. Hasida, H. Isahara, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, & T. Tokunaga (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S.
(2016) The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 321, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Y., & Wang, J.
(2018) cwungkwukin haksupcatuluy pocoyongen sayongyangsang kochal – cakmwun pwunsekul thonghan sayongpinto cosa mich olyu pwunsek [Exploring the use of Korean auxiliary verbs among Chinese learners]. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 511, 175–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J.
(2006) Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28(6), 604–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Felice, R., & Pulman, S.
(2009) Automatic detection of preposition errors in learner writing. Calico Journal, 26(3), 512–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, P.
(2000) Tagging non-native English with the TOSCA–ICLE tagger. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory (pp. 69–79). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
de Mönnink, I.
(2000) Parsing a learner corpus. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory (pp. 81–90). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
(2009) Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
(2017) Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G.
(2008) Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics and corpus linguistics: A mutualistic entente (pp. 119–149). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, C. H., & Palmer, M.
(2005) A morphological tagger for Korean: Statistical tagging combined with corpus-based morphological rule application. Machine Translation, 18(4), 275–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(1990) The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language, 14(1), 25–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E.
(2004) Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 5–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. T., Zheng, X., Meng, X., & Snedeker, J.
(2013) Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 589–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huh, C.-G.
(2018) cwungkwukin haksupcauy kulssukiey nathanan hankwuke eswunuy haksup yangsang [The aspects of learning word order of Korean language of Chinese learners]. tonamemwunhak, 341, 255–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S., & Lakshmanan, U.
(1998) Learnability, negative evidence and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research, 14(1), 62–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, H.
(2014) Processing and acquisition of Korean passive voice by Chinese L2 learners. hankwuke kyoyuk [Korean Education], 25(2), 165–186.Google Scholar
Ju, M. K.
(2000) Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 85–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., & Rah, Y.
(2016) Effects of verb semantics and proficiency in second language use of constructional knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 716–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., Shin, G.-H., & Hwang, H.
(2020) Integration of verbal and constructional information in the Second Language processing of English dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(4), 825–847. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.-G., Kang, B.-M., & Hong, J.
(2007) 21seyki seycongkyeyhoyk hyentaykwuke kichomalmwungchi sengkwawa cenmang [21st century Sejong modern Korean corpora: Results and expectations]. In Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers (Ed.), Proceedings of Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology 31 (pp. 311–316). Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers.Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., Park, Y. H., Kim, M. J., Kim, H. N., Choi, S. K., Suh, J. H., & Kwak, Y. J.
(2016) hankwuke haksupcauy cakmwun malmwungchilul hwalyonghan mwunhyeng yonglyey kemsaykki kaypal yenkwu [A study of developing usage searcher of grammar pattern in the Korean learner’s writing corpus]. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 441, 131–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. J., & Kim, S. H.
(2013) yeseng kyelhonimincauy kwueey nathanan tamhwaphyoci sayong yangsang yenkwu [A study on the use aspects of discouse markers appeared in spoken Korean language of marriage woman immigrants]. The Journal of Linguistics Science, 641, 25–46.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-I.
(2019) hankwuke kyocayuy ‘-i/hi/li/ki-’ phitong tanwen pwunsekkwa kyoswu pangan ceysi [Analysis and Teaching Methods of the ‘-i/hi/li/gi-’ Passive unit in Korean textbooks]. Journal of Korean Language Education, 30(1), 27–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W., & Ock, C. Y.
(2015) hankwuke kyekthul sacenkwa uymiyek pinto cengpolul sayonghan hankwuke uymiyek kyelceng [Korean semantic role labeling using case frame and frequency]. Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 11(2), 161–167.Google Scholar
Kwak, S. J.
(2016) mikwuk nay tayhak haksupcatuluy cakmwun pwunsekul thonghan hankwuke swuktalto swucwunpyel pikyo yenkwu – yuthatay salyeyyenkwu [A comparative study of American university students’ Korean proficiency by level through analysis of composition: A case study at the University of Utah]. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 441, 23–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K.
(2016) Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S.
(2017) Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing, 34(4), 513–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C.
(2018) The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1030–1046. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Ellis, S.
(2009) The development and validation of a Korean C-Test using Rasch Analysis. Language Testing, 26(2), 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I.
(2011) kwukehakkaysel [Introduction to Korean linguistics]. Seoul: Hakyensa.Google Scholar
Lee, J.
(2017) tayhaksayng cakmwuney nathanan ehwi tayangseng yenkwu – oykwukin yuhaksayngkwa hankwukinuy pikyolul cwungsimulo [A studyon lexical diversities in writing of university students – Focusing on the comparison of Koreans and foreign students]. tayhakcakmwun, 191, 61–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-M.
(2017) hankwuke haksupcauy malhakiwa ssukiey nathanan ehwi sayonguy congtancek yenkwu [A longitudinal study of vocabulary usage presented in speaking and writing of Korean learners]. wulimalkul, 741, 183–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-H., Dickenson, M., & Israel, R.
(2016) Challenges of learner corpus annotation: Focusing on Korean Learner Language Analysis (KoLLA) system. Language Facts and Perspectives, 381, 221–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. K.
(2007) Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57(1), 87–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-A., & Choi, J.-T.
(2013) hankwuke Verb_OntoNetuy selkyeywa kwuchwuk [Design and implementation of Korean Verb_OntoNet]. Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 11(2), 161–167.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S.
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, N.
(2016) The structures of Chinese long and short bei passives revisited. Language and Linguistics, 17(6), 857–889. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, X.
(2010) Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meurers, D.
(2015) Learner corpora and natural language processing. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 537–566). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meurers, D., & Dickinson, M.
(2017) Evidence and interpretation in language learning research: Opportunities for collaboration with computational linguistics. Language Learning, 67(S1), 66–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R., Mitchell, T., & Pessoa, S.
(2016) Impact of source texts and prompts on students’ genre uptake. Journal of Second Language Writing, 311, 11–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y.
(2016) L2 hankwuke mwune sanchwuleyseuy thongsa pokcapseng chukceng [Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 Korean writings]. Korean Semantics, 511, 21–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Y. J., & Hong, U. P.
(2014) L2loseuy hankwuke cayenpalhwa khophesuuy kwuchwukkwa hwalyong [Towards a corpus-based approach to Korean as a second language]. The Journal of the Humanities for Unification, 571, 193–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, E., & Cho, S.
(2014) KoNLPy: swipko kankyelhan hankwuke cengpocheli phaissen phaykhici [KoNLPy: Korean natural language processing in Python]. cey26hoy hankul mich hankwuke cengpocheli hakswultayhoy nonmwuncip.Google Scholar
Park, H.-J., & Lee, M.-H.
(2017) hankwuke haksupcauy ssuki theyksuthuey nathanan ungkyelsengkwa ungcipsenguy sangkwanpwunsek [Correlation analysis of cohesion and coherence in Korean as a second language student’s writing]. Wulimalkul, 731, 133–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, J., Hong, J. P., & Cha, J. W.
(2016) Korean language resources for everyone. In J. C. Park & J.-W. Chung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation: Oral Papers (pp. 49–58).Google Scholar
Park, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-W.
(2014) hankwuke haksupcalul wihan hankwuke mwuncang kwuseng kyoyuk pangan yenkwu – cwungkwukin haksupcauy eswuney ttalun kulssuki olyu pwunsekul thonghaye [A study on effective teaching strategies for Korean language writers through error analysis]. Studies in Linguistics, 331, 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y.-K., Kim, J.-M., Lee, S.-D., & Lee, H. A.
(2017) oykwukin haksupcalul wihan mwunmayk kipan silsikan kwuke mwuncang kyoceng [Context Based Real-time Korean Writing Correction for Foreigners]. Journal of KIISE, 44(10), 1087–1093. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V. and Vanderplas, J.
(2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 121, 2825–2830.Google Scholar
Petrov, S., Das, D., & McDonald, R.
(2012) A universal part-of-speech tagset. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U. Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 2089–2096). European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Qi, P., Dozat, T., Zhang, Y., & Manning, C. D.
(2018) Universal dependency parsing from scratch. In D. Zeman & J. Hajič (Eds.), Proceedings of the CoNLL 2018 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (pp. 160–170). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Römer, U., Roberson, A., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C.
(2014) Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions. ICAME Journal, 38(1), 115–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, S.
(2017) hankwuke haksupcauy cakmwun calyoey nathanan cepsokpwusa sayong yangsang yenkwu – pinto cengpolul cwungsimulo [A Study on the use of Korean conjunctive adverbs in Korean learners by analyzing their writing – Focusing on frequency information]. mwunpep kyoyuk, 291, 143–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seo, S.-B.
(2014) oykwukin yuhaksaynguy hankwuke ssuki olyu pwunsek – hakpwu cayhak yuhaksayng paykilcang cakmwunul taysangulo [A study on analysis of error patterns in Korean writing of international students – Focusing on essay writing contest for university students]. wulimalkul, 621, 127–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, A.
(2013) Alignment of verbal person marking. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/100
Shin, G.-H.
forthcoming). Automatic analysis of caregiver input and child production: Insight into corpus-based research on child language development in Korean. Korean Linguistics.
(2020) Connecting input to comprehension: First language acquisition of active transitives and suffixal passives by Korean-speaking preschool children. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Sohn, H. M.
(1999) The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Song, J. J.
(2015) Causatives. In L. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp. 116–136). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, S., & Choe, J. W.
(2007) Type hierarchies for passive forms in Korean. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stanford Department of Linguistics and CSLI’s LinGO Lab (pp. 250–270). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Song, W.
(2018) cwungkwukin chokup hankwuke haksupcauy kulssukiey nathanan cosa olyu yangsangkwa cito pangan yenkwu [A Study on the auxiliary word error pattern and guidance method in the writing of Chinese elementary Korean learners]. cakmwunyenkwu, 381, 119–147.Google Scholar
Straka, M., & Straková, J.
(2017) Tokenizing, POS Tagging, lemmatizing and parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe. In J. Hajič & D. Zeman (Eds.), Proceedings of the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (pp. 88–99). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, C. F., & Givón, T.
(1985) On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language, 611, 329–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sung, M.-C., & Kim, H.
(2020) Effects of verb–construction association on second language constructional generalizations in production and comprehension. Second Language Research. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, R.
(2007) What can SLA learn from contrastive corpus linguistics? The case of passive constructions in Chinese learner English. Indonesian JELT, 3(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Xiao, R., McEnery, T., & Qian, Y.
(2006) Passive constructions in English and Chinese: A corpus-based contrastive study. Languages in Contrast, 6(1), 109–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Won, M., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., & Wang, H.
(2017) hankwuke haksupcauy ssukiey nathanan ehwi phwungyoto yenkwu-swuktalto chukceng tokwulosse ehwi phwungyoto chukceng kanungsengul cwungsimulo [A study of lexical richness of Korean learners’ writing: The possibility of using lexical richness to measure language level]. emwunlonchong, 711, 33–55.Google Scholar
Yeon, J.
(2015) Passives. In L. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp. 116–136). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeman, D., Hajič, J., Popel, M., Potthast, M., Straka, M., Ginter, F., Nivre, J., & Petrov, S.
(2018) CoNLL 2018 shared task: Multilingual parsing from raw text to Universal Dependencies. In D. Zeman & J. Hajič (Eds.), Proceedings of the CoNLL 2018 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (pp. 1–21). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar


Automatic analysis of passive constructions in Korean
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Shin, Gyu-Ho & Sun Hee Park
2021. Isomorphism and language-specific devices in comprehension of Korean suffixal passive construction by Mandarin-speaking learners of Korean. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.