Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 3:1 (2017) ► pp.61–94

Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research

| FNRS | Université catholique de Louvain
| Georgetown University
This study aims to provide the first empirical assessment of quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. We systematically review quantitative primary studies referenced in the Learner Corpus Bibliography (LCB), a representative bibliography of learner corpus research maintained by the Learner Corpus Association which contained 1,276 references when the current study began. Each primary study in the LCB was coded for over fifty features representing six dimensions: (a) publication type (i.e. conference paper, book chapter, journal article), (b) research focus (e.g. lexis, grammar), (c) methodological features (e.g. keyword analysis, error analysis, use of reference corpus), (d) statistical analyses (e.g. X², t-test, regression analysis), and (e) reporting practices (e.g. reliability coefficients, means). Results point to several systematic strengths as well as many flaws, such as the absence of research questions, incomplete and inconsistent reporting practices (e.g. means without standard deviations), and lack of statistical literacy (i.e. LCR studies generally overrely on tests of statistical significance, do not report effect sizes, rarely check or report whether statistical assumptions have been met, and rarely use multivariate analyses). Improvements over time, however, are clearly noted and there are signs that, like other related disciplines, learner corpus research is slowly undergoing methodological reform.
Keywords: study quality, quantitative research methods, reporting practices, research synthesis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Quantitative designs and statistical techniques in corpus linguistics
    • 2.2Assessing study quality in SLA
    • 2.3The present study
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Study identification
    • 3.2Data collection and coding
    • 3.3Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Learner demographics, learning contexts, and study designs
    • 4.2Analyses
    • 4.3Reporting practices
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The ‘what’ of learner corpus research
    • 5.2The ‘how’ of learner corpus research
    • 5.3Recommendations for future research
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 6 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq
References
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards
2008 “Reporting standards for research in psychology”, American Psychologist 63(9), 839–851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
2001 Word Frequency Distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M. & Evert, S.
2008 “Statistical methods for corpus exploitation”. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 777–803.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Reppen, R.
2015a “Introduction”. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) 2015b The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
1988 “The fundamental character of foreign language learning”. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Grammar and Second Language Teaching: A Book of Readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 19–30.Google Scholar
Boyd, A., Hana, J., Nicolas, L., Meurers, D., Wisniewski, K., Abel, A., Schöne, K., Štindlová, B. & Vettori, C.
2014 “The MERLIN corpus: Learner language and the CEFR”. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Reykjavik, May 26–31, 2014.Google Scholar
Brezina, V. & Meyerhoff, M.
2014 “Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H.
2013 “Notes from the editor”, The Modern Language Journal 97(4), 825–827. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlsen, C.
2012 “Proficiency level – a fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora”, Applied Linguistics 33(2), 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dagneaux, E., Denness, S. & Granger, S.
1998 “Computer-aided error analysis”, System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 26(2), 163–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I. & Ravid, D.
2010 “Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition”, Applied Psycholinguistics 311, 413–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrick, D. J.
2016 “Instrument reporting practices in second language research”, TESOL Quarterly 501, 132–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
dissertation.laerd.com
2012: online. “Types of quantitative research question”, Laerd Dissertation Online. Available at: [URL] (accessed May 2016).
Durrant, P.
2014 “Corpus frequency and second language learners’ knowledge of collocations: A meta-analysis”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 191, 443–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
2009 “A historical survey of SLA research”. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingley, England: Emerald, 3–27.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Fleck, C., Leder, N., & Svetics, I.
1998 “Ahistoricity revisited. Does SLA have a history?”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 201, 407–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A. & Weakliem, D.
2009 “Of beauty, sex, and power: Too little attention has been paid to the statistical challenges in estimating small effects”, American Scientist 971, 310–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., Granger, S. & Paquot, M.
2007 “Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4), 319–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S.
2010 The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-La-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. & Spino, L.
2015 “Reconceptualizing reactivity of think-alouds and eye tracking: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”, Language Learning 651, 896–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
1996 “From CA to CIA and back: an integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora”. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in Contrast. Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies. Lund: Lund University Press, 37–51.Google Scholar
1997 “Automated retrieval of passives from native and learner corpora: precision and recall”, Journal of English Linguistics 25(4), 365–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Computer learner corpus research: Current status and future prospects”. In U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 123–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis: A reappraisal”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S. & Bestgen, Y.
forthcoming. “Using collgrams to assess L2 phraseological development: A replication study”. In P. de Haan, R. de Vries, & S. van Vuuren Eds. Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation Louvain-la-Neuve Presses universitaires de Louvain
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M.
2009 International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-Rom). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Gilquin, G. & Meunier, F.
2015 The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries S.
2006a “Some proposals towards more rigorous corpus linguistics”, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2), 191–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b “Exploring variability within and between corpora: Some methodological considerations”, Corpora 1(2), 109–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.
2010 “Methodological skills in corpus linguistics: a polemic and some pointers towards quantitative methods”. In T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 121–146.Google Scholar
2013a “Statistical tests for the analysis of learner corpus data”. In A. Diaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction (2nd edition). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Quantitative corpus approaches to linguistic analysis: seven or eight levels of resolution and the lessons they teach us”. In I. Taavitsainen, M. Kytö, C. Claridge, & J. Smith (Eds.), Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a “Statistics for learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “Quantitative designs and statistical techniques”. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 50–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015c “Some current quantitative problems in corpus linguistics and a sketch of some solutions”, Language and Linguistics 16(1), 93–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. & Wulff, S.
2013 “The genitive alternation in Chinese and German ESL learners. Towards a multifactorial notion of context in learner corpus research”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3), 327–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J., Alderson, C. & Schroonen, R.
2010 “Developmental stages in second language acquisition and levels of second-language proficiency: Are there links between them?”. In I. Bartning, M. Martin, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and language Testing Research. European Second Language Assocation: EUROSLA Series Monographs 1, 11–22.Google Scholar
Ioannidis J. P. A., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D. & Goodman, S. N.
2015 “Meta-research: Evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices”, PLoS Biology 13(10), 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A.
2001 “Comparing corpora”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6(1), 97–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Language is never, ever, ever random”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1–2, 263–275.Google Scholar
Köhler, R.
2013 “Statistical Comparability: Methodological Caveats”. In S. Sharoff, R. Rapp, P. Zweigenbaum, & P. Fung (Eds.), Building and Using Comparable Corpora. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 77–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. & Herrington, R.
2010 “Improving data analysis in second language acquisition by utilizing modern developments in applied statistics”, Applied Linguistics 31(3), 368–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. & Plonsky, L.
2015 “Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field”, Language Learning 65(S1), 127–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N.
2015 How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M. W.
2009 “Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities”. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis (2nd edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 147–158.Google Scholar
Liu, Q. & Brown, D.
2015 “Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing”, Journal of Second Language Writing 301, 66–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., Jones, R. H. & De Costa, P. I.
2016 “TESOL Quarterly Research Guidelines”, TESOL Quarterly 501, 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Gass, S.
2011 Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Marsden, E.
(Eds.) 2016 Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Mackey, A. & Plonsky, L.
2016 “Breadth and depth: The IRIS repository”. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. New York: Routledge, 1–21.Google Scholar
Meunier, F.
2010 “Learner corpora and English language teaching: Checkup time”, Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 21(1), 209–220.Google Scholar
Myles, F.
2008 “Investigating learner language development with electronic longitudinal corpora: Theoretical and methodological issues”. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York and London: Routledge, 58–72.Google Scholar
Norris, J.
2015 “Statistical significance testing in second language research: Basic problems and suggestions for reform”, Language Learning 65(S1), 97–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., Plonsky, L., Ross, S. & R. Schoonen
2015 “Guidelines for reporting quantitative methods and results in primary research”, Language Learning 65(2): 470–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
2009 Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
2013 “SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn”, Language Learning 63(S1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. & Iberri-Shea, G.
2005 “Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: recent trends and future directions”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 251, 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H.
2008 “Theorizing advancedness, setting up the longitudinal research agenda”. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York: Routledge, 281–300.Google Scholar
Paquot, M. & Bestgen, Y.
2009 “Distinctive words in academic writing: a comparison of three statistical tests for keyword extraction”. In A. Jucker, D. Schreier & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 247–269.Google Scholar
Paquot, M. & Granger, S.
2012 “Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 321, 130–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pendar, N. & Chapelle, C.
2008 “Investigating the promise of learner corpora: Methodological issues”, CALICO Journal 25(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L.
2013 “Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 351, 655–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform”, The Modern Language Journal 98(1), 450–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a “Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes: a ‘back-to-basics’ approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research”. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge, 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) 2015b Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015c “Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics”, CALICO Journal 321, 232–244.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Derrick, D. J.
2016 “A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research”, Modern Language Journal 1001, 538–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Gass, S.
2011 “Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research”, Language Learning 611, 325–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., Egbert, J. & LaFlair, G. T.
2015 “Bootstrapping in applied linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data”, Applied Linguistics 361, 591–610.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Kim, Y.
2016 “Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 361, 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L.
2015 “Meta-analyzing second language research”. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge, 106–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press. Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. DOI logo
Porte, G.
(Ed.) 2012 Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Present-Thomas, R. L., Weltens, B. & de Jong, J. H. A. L.
2013 “Defining proficiency: A comparative analysis of CEF level classification methods in a written learner corpus”, Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1), 57–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
2009 “The inseparability of lexis and grammar. Corpus linguistic perspectives”, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 71, 141–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. & Mackey, B.
2015 “Bayesian Approaches to Imputation, Hypothesis Testing, and Parameter Estimation”, Language Learning 65 (Supp. 1), 208–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
1972 “Interlanguage”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 101, 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH.
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.
2006 “Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency”. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 279–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, K. & Littell, J. H.
2009 “Study quality assessment in systematic reviews of research on intervention effects”, Research on Social Work Practice 191, 52–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, N.
2016 “Methodological practices in interaction in synchronous computer mediated communication: A synthetic approach”. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Instruments for Research into Second Languages: Empirical Studies Advancing Methodology. New York: Routledge, 197–223.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 51 other publications

Abe, Mariko
2019. Comparing errors across an L2 spoken and written error-tagged Japanese EFL learner corpus. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Amini Farsani, Mohammad & Esmat Babaii
2020. Applied linguistics research in three decades: a methodological synthesis of graduate theses in an EFL context. Quality & Quantity 54:4 ► pp. 1257 ff. DOI logo
Ballier, Nicolas, Stéphane Canu, Caroline Petitjean, Gilles Gasso, Carlos Balhana, Theodora Alexopoulou & Thomas Gaillat
2020. Machine learning for learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:1 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Bell, Philippa, Laura Collins & Emma Marsden
2020. Building an Oral and Written Learner Corpus of a School Programme: Methodological Issues. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Diao, Wenhao & Chen Chen
2022. L2 use of pragmatic markers in peer talk: Mandarin utterance-final particles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1293 ff. DOI logo
Diaz, Brett A.
2022. Finding social (mis)alignment in older adult and opioid health policy implementation with corpus-assisted discourse analysis. Applied Corpus Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 100020 ff. DOI logo
Du, Hang
2022. Building a corpus of spoken Chinese interlanguage and some results of preliminary analyses. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 57:3 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Faya-Cerqueiro, Fátima & Gema Alcaraz-Mármol
2020. The Toledo Teacher Trainees corpus (TTT): Bridging the gap between students’ narratives and corpus linguistics. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Julieta
2022. Corpus linguistics in L2 pragmatics research. Applied Pragmatics 4:2 ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Fernández, Julieta & Tracy S. Davis
2020. Overview of Available Learner Corpora. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora, ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Gao, Jianwu, Quy Huynh Phu Pham & Charlene Polio
2022. The role of theory in quantitative and qualitative second language learning research: A corpus-based analysis. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 100006 ff. DOI logo
Gass, Susan, Shawn Loewen & Luke Plonsky
2021. Coming of age: the past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research. Language Teaching 54:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Gonulal, Talip, Shawn Loewen & Luke Plonsky
2017. The development of statistical literacy in applied linguistics graduate students. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Granger, Sylviane & Marie-Aude Lefer
2023. Learner translation corpora. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2018. On over- and underuse in learner corpus research and multifactoriality in corpus linguistics more generally. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:2 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th. & Magali Paquot
2020. Writing up a Corpus-Linguistic Paper. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Gu, Ling & Naeem Jan
2022. Corpus-Driven Resource Recommendation Algorithm for English Online Autonomous Learning. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Götz, Sandra
2019. Filled pauses across proficiency levels, L1s and learning context variables. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al-Hoorie & Reid Evans
2022. COMPLEX DYNAMIC SYSTEMS THEORY IN LANGUAGE LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:4 ► pp. 913 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Chan-Chia, Richard Hill Davis & Yu-Chi Wang
2020. Chinese learners’ use of concessive connectors in English argumentative writing. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 46:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Yan, Akira Murakami, Theodora Alexopoulou & Anna Korhonen
2018. Dependency parsing of learner English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Kaatari, Henrik, Tove Larsson, Ying Wang, Seda Acikara-Eickhoff & Pia Sundqvist
2023. Exploring the effects of target-language extramural activities on students’ written production. Journal of Second Language Writing 62 ► pp. 101062 ff. DOI logo
König, Alexander, Jennifer-Carmen Frey & Egon W. Stemle
2021. Exploring Reusability and Reproducibility for a Research Infrastructure for L1 and L2 Learner Corpora. Information 12:5 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Tove, Jesse Egbert & Douglas Biber
2022. On the status of statistical reporting versus linguistic description in corpus linguistics: a ten-year perspective. Corpora 17:1 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Tove, Magali Paquot & Douglas Biber
2021. Chapter 9. On the importance of register in learner writing. In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Tove, Magali Paquot & Luke Plonsky
2020. Inter-rater reliability in Learner Corpus Research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2 ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Tove, Luke Plonsky & Gregory R. Hancock
2021. On the benefits of structural equation modeling for corpus linguists. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3 ► pp. 683 ff. DOI logo
Li, Mimi
2021. Computer-Mediated Teacher Feedback. In Researching and Teaching Second Language Writing in the Digital Age, ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristóbal
2022. CEDEL2: Design, compilation and web interface of an online corpus for L2 Spanish acquisition research. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 965 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Paloma Fernández-Mira
2022. Designing, compiling and interrogating corpora in L2 Spanish acquisition research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Mahmoodi, Mohammad Hadi & Moslem Yousefi
2022. Second language motivation research 2010–2019: a synthetic exploration. The Language Learning Journal 50:3 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Mizumoto, Atsushi, Luke Plonsky & Jesse Egbert
2020. Meta-analyzing Corpus Linguistic Research. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 663 ff. DOI logo
Myles, Florence
2020. Commentary: An SLA Perspective on Learner Corpus Research. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Paquot, Magali
2018. Corpus Research Methods for Language Teaching and Learning. In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology, ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Paquot, Magali & Marcus Callies
2020. Promoting methodological expertise, transparency, replication, and cumulative learning. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Park, Hae In, Megan Solon, Marzieh Dehghan‐Chaleshtori & Hessameddin Ghanbar
2022. Proficiency Reporting Practices in Research on Second Language Acquisition: Have We Made any Progress?. Language Learning 72:1 ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo
Phakiti, Aek, Peter De Costa, Luke Plonsky & Sue Starfield
2018. Applied Linguistics Research: Current Issues, Methods, and Trends. In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology, ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
PLONSKY, LUKE & HESSAMEDDIN GHANBAR
2018. Multiple Regression in L2 Research: A Methodological Synthesis and Guide to Interpreting R2 Values . The Modern Language Journal 102:4 ► pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Plonsky, Luke, Emma Marsden, Dustin Crowther, Susan M Gass & Patti Spinner
2020. A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research 36:4 ► pp. 583 ff. DOI logo
Pyykönen, Maria
2023. Epistemic stance in written L2 English: The role of task type, L2 proficiency, and authorial style. Applied Corpus Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 100040 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual
2022. Review of Tracy-Ventura & Paquot (2021): The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8:2 ► pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Redmond, Leslie, Denis Foucambert & Lucie Libersan
2023. Language Corpora and Principal Components Analysis. In Applied Data Science [Studies in Big Data, 125], ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Bryan & Ana Oskoz
2023. Current Themes and Trends in CALL Research. CALICO Journal 40:2 ► pp. i ff. DOI logo
Sudina, Ekaterina
2021. Study and Scale Quality in Second Language Survey Research, 2009–2019: The Case of Anxiety and Motivation. Language Learning 71:4 ► pp. 1149 ff. DOI logo
Sönning, Lukas & Valentin Werner
2021. The replication crisis, scientific revolutions, and linguistics. Linguistics 59:5 ► pp. 1179 ff. DOI logo
Teimouri, Yasser, Julia Goetze & Luke Plonsky
2019. SECOND LANGUAGE ANXIETY AND ACHIEVEMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:2 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Visonà, Mark Winston & Luke Plonsky
2020. Arabic as a heritage language: A scoping review. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:4 ► pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Volodina, Elena, Lena Granstedt, Arild Matsson, Beáta Megyesi, Ildikó Pilán, Julia Prentice, Dan Rosén, Lisa Rudebeck, Carl-Johan Schenström, Gunlög Sundberg & Mats Wirén
2019. The SweLL Language Learner Corpus. Northern European Journal of Language Technology 6 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Martine Grice
2021. Independence and generalizability in linguistics. Linguistics 59:5 ► pp. 1251 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Tatjana & Elen Le Foll
2022. Testing the pedagogical norm. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Wisniewski, Katrin
2022. Gesprochene Lernerkorpora des Deutschen: Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.