Article published in:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 3:1 (2017) ► pp. 6194

Full-text

Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research
References

References

APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards
2008 “Reporting standards for research in psychology”, American Psychologist 63(9), 839–851. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
2001Word Frequency Distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M. & Evert, S.
2008 “Statistical methods for corpus exploitation”. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 777–803.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Reppen, R.
2015a “Introduction”. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) 2015bThe Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 90 ]
Bley-Vroman, R.
1988 “The fundamental character of foreign language learning”. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Grammar and Second Language Teaching: A Book of Readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 19–30.Google Scholar
Boyd, A., Hana, J., Nicolas, L., Meurers, D., Wisniewski, K., Abel, A., Schöne, K., Štindlová, B. & Vettori, C.
2014 “The MERLIN corpus: Learner language and the CEFR”. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Reykjavik, May 26–31, 2014.Google Scholar
Brezina, V. & Meyerhoff, M.
2014 “Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H.
2013 “Notes from the editor”, The Modern Language Journal 97(4), 825–827. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlsen, C.
2012 “Proficiency level – a fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora”, Applied Linguistics 33(2), 161–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dagneaux, E., Denness, S. & Granger, S.
1998 “Computer-aided error analysis”, System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 26(2), 163–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I. & Ravid, D.
2010 “Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition”, Applied Psycholinguistics 31, 413–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derrick, D. J.
2016 “Instrument reporting practices in second language research”, TESOL Quarterly 50, 132–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
dissertation.laerd.com
2012: online. “Types of quantitative research question”, Laerd Dissertation Online. Available at: http://​dissertation​.laerd​.com​/types​-of​-quantitative​-research​-question​.php (accessed May 2016).
Durrant, P.
2014 “Corpus frequency and second language learners’ knowledge of collocations: A meta-analysis”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19, 443–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
2009 “A historical survey of SLA research”. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingley, England: Emerald, 3–27.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Fleck, C., Leder, N., & Svetics, I.
1998 “Ahistoricity revisited. Does SLA have a history?”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 407–421.Google Scholar
Gelman, A. & Weakliem, D.
2009 “Of beauty, sex, and power: Too little attention has been paid to the statistical challenges in estimating small effects”, American Scientist 97, 310–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., Granger, S. & Paquot, M.
2007 “Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4), 319–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S.
2010The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-La-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. & Spino, L.
2015 “Reconceptualizing reactivity of think-alouds and eye tracking: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”, Language Learning 65, 896–928. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
1996 “From CA to CIA and back: an integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora”. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in Contrast. Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies. Lund: Lund University Press, 37–51.Google Scholar
1997 “Automated retrieval of passives from native and learner corpora: precision and recall”, Journal of English Linguistics 25(4), 365–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 91 ]
2004 “Computer learner corpus research: Current status and future prospects”. In U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 123–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis: A reappraisal”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S. & Bestgen, Y.
forthcoming. “Using collgrams to assess L2 phraseological development: A replication study”. In P. de Haan, R. de Vries, & S. van Vuuren Eds. Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M.
2009International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-Rom). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Gilquin, G. & Meunier, F.
2015The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries S.
2006a “Some proposals towards more rigorous corpus linguistics”, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2), 191–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006b “Exploring variability within and between corpora: Some methodological considerations”, Corpora 1(2), 109–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.
2010 “Methodological skills in corpus linguistics: a polemic and some pointers towards quantitative methods”. In T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 121–146.Google Scholar
2013a “Statistical tests for the analysis of learner corpus data”. In A. Diaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bStatistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction (2nd edition). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Quantitative corpus approaches to linguistic analysis: seven or eight levels of resolution and the lessons they teach us”. In I. Taavitsainen, M. Kytö, C. Claridge, & J. Smith (Eds.), Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a “Statistics for learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b “Quantitative designs and statistical techniques”. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 50–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015c “Some current quantitative problems in corpus linguistics and a sketch of some solutions”, Language and Linguistics 16(1), 93–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. & Wulff, S.
2013 “The genitive alternation in Chinese and German ESL learners. Towards a multifactorial notion of context in learner corpus research”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3), 327–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J., Alderson, C. & Schroonen, R.
2010 “Developmental stages in second language acquisition and levels of second-language proficiency: Are there links between them?”. In I. Bartning, M. Martin, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and language Testing Research. European Second Language Assocation: EUROSLA Series Monographs 1, 11–22.Google Scholar
[ p. 92 ]
Ioannidis J. P. A., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D. & Goodman, S. N.
2015 “Meta-research: Evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices”, PLoS Biology 13(10), 1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A.
2001 “Comparing corpora”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6(1), 97–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Language is never, ever, ever random”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1–2, 263–275.Google Scholar
Köhler, R.
2013 “Statistical Comparability: Methodological Caveats”. In S. Sharoff, R. Rapp, P. Zweigenbaum, & P. Fung (Eds.), Building and Using Comparable Corpora. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 77–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. & Herrington, R.
2010 “Improving data analysis in second language acquisition by utilizing modern developments in applied statistics”, Applied Linguistics 31(3), 368–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. & Plonsky, L.
2015 “Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field”, Language Learning 65(S1), 127–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N.
2015How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M. W.
2009 “Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities”. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis (2nd edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 147–158.Google Scholar
Liu, Q. & Brown, D.
2015 “Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing”, Journal of Second Language Writing 30, 66–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., Jones, R. H. & De Costa, P. I.
2016 “TESOL Quarterly Research Guidelines”, TESOL Quarterly 50, 42–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Gass, S.
2011Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Marsden, E.
(Eds.) 2016Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Mackey, A. & Plonsky, L.
2016 “Breadth and depth: The IRIS repository”. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. New York: Routledge, 1–21.Google Scholar
Meunier, F.
2010 “Learner corpora and English language teaching: Checkup time”, Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 21(1), 209–220.Google Scholar
Myles, F.
2008 “Investigating learner language development with electronic longitudinal corpora: Theoretical and methodological issues”. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York and London: Routledge, 58–72.Google Scholar
Norris, J.
2015 “Statistical significance testing in second language research: Basic problems and suggestions for reform”, Language Learning 65(S1), 97–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., Plonsky, L., Ross, S. & R. Schoonen
2015 “Guidelines for reporting quantitative methods and results in primary research”, Language Learning 65(2): 470–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
2009Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
2013 “SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn”, Language Learning 63(S1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 93 ]
Ortega, L. & Iberri-Shea, G.
2005 “Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: recent trends and future directions”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25, 26–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H.
2008 “Theorizing advancedness, setting up the longitudinal research agenda”. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York: Routledge, 281–300.Google Scholar
Paquot, M. & Bestgen, Y.
2009 “Distinctive words in academic writing: a comparison of three statistical tests for keyword extraction”. In A. Jucker, D. Schreier & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 247–269.Google Scholar
Paquot, M. & Granger, S.
2012 “Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 130–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pendar, N. & Chapelle, C.
2008 “Investigating the promise of learner corpora: Methodological issues”, CALICO Journal 25(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L.
2013 “Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 655–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform”, The Modern Language Journal 98(1), 450–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a “Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes: a ‘back-to-basics’ approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research”. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge, 23–45.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 2015bAdvancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015c “Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics”, CALICO Journal 32, 232–244.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Derrick, D. J.
2016 “A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research”, Modern Language Journal 100, 538–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Gass, S.
2011 “Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research”, Language Learning 61, 325–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., Egbert, J. & LaFlair, G. T.
2015 “Bootstrapping in applied linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data”, Applied Linguistics 36, 591–610.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Kim, Y.
2016 “Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36, 73–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L.
2015 “Meta-analyzing second language research”. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge, 106–128.Google Scholar
in press. Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Crossref
Porte, G.
(Ed.) 2012Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Present-Thomas, R. L., Weltens, B. & de Jong, J. H. A. L.
2013 “Defining proficiency: A comparative analysis of CEF level classification methods in a written learner corpus”, Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1), 57–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
2009 “The inseparability of lexis and grammar. Corpus linguistic perspectives”, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7, 141–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 94 ]
Ross, S. & Mackey, B.
2015 “Bayesian Approaches to Imputation, Hypothesis Testing, and Parameter Estimation”, Language Learning 65 (Supp. 1), 208–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
1972 “Interlanguage”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10, 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH.
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.
2006 “Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency”. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 279–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, K. & Littell, J. H.
2009 “Study quality assessment in systematic reviews of research on intervention effects”, Research on Social Work Practice 19, 52–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, N.
2016 “Methodological practices in interaction in synchronous computer mediated communication: A synthetic approach”. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Instruments for Research into Second Languages: Empirical Studies Advancing Methodology. New York: Routledge, 197–223.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2020. Promoting methodological expertise, transparency, replication, and cumulative learning. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2 Crossref logo
Abe, Mariko
2019.  In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92],  pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo
Amini Farsani, Mohammad & Esmat Babaii
2020. Applied linguistics research in three decades: a methodological synthesis of graduate theses in an EFL context. Quality & Quantity 54:4  pp. 1257 ff. Crossref logo
Ballier, Nicolas, Stéphane Canu, Caroline Petitjean, Gilles Gasso, Carlos Balhana, Theodora Alexopoulou & Thomas Gaillat
2020. Machine learning for learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:1  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Faya-Cerqueiro, Fátima & Gema Alcaraz-Mármol
2020. The Toledo Teacher Trainees corpus (TTT): Bridging the gap between students’ narratives and corpus linguistics. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Gass, Susan, Shawn Loewen & Luke Plonsky
2020. Coming of age: the past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research. Language Teaching  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gonulal, Talip, Shawn Loewen & Luke Plonsky
2017. The development of statistical literacy in applied linguistics graduate students. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168:1  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2018. On over- and underuse in learner corpus research and multifactoriality in corpus linguistics more generally. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:2  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Götz, Sandra
2019. Filled pauses across proficiency levels, L1s and learning context variables. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Hsu, Chan-Chia, Richard Hill Davis & Yu-Chi Wang
2020. Chinese learners’ use of concessive connectors in English argumentative writing. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 46:1  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Huang, Yan, Akira Murakami, Theodora Alexopoulou & Anna Korhonen
2018. Dependency parsing of learner English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Larsson, Tove, Magali Paquot & Luke Plonsky
2020. Inter-rater reliability in Learner Corpus Research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2 Crossref logo
Paquot, Magali
2018.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology,  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Phakiti, Aek, Peter De Costa, Luke Plonsky & Sue Starfield
2018.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology,  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
PLONSKY, LUKE & HESSAMEDDIN GHANBAR
2018. Multiple Regression in L2 Research: A Methodological Synthesis and Guide to InterpretingR2Values. The Modern Language Journal 102:4  pp. 713 ff. Crossref logo
Plonsky, Luke, Emma Marsden, Dustin Crowther, Susan M Gass & Patti Spinner
2020. A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research 36:4  pp. 583 ff. Crossref logo
Teimouri, Yasser, Julia Goetze & Luke Plonsky
2019. SECOND LANGUAGE ANXIETY AND ACHIEVEMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:2  pp. 363 ff. Crossref logo
Visonà, Mark Winston & Luke Plonsky
2020. Arabic as a heritage language: A scoping review. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:4  pp. 599 ff. Crossref logo
Volodina, Elena, Lena Granstedt, Arild Matsson, Beáta Megyesi, Ildikó Pilán, Julia Prentice, Dan Rosén, Lisa Rudebeck, Carl-Johan Schenström, Gunlög Sundberg & Mats Wirén
2019. The SweLL Language Learner Corpus. Northern European Journal of Language Technology 6  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.