Review published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 3:1 (2017) ► pp.95100
References
Alderson, J. C.
1996 “Do corpora have a role in language assessment?” In J. Thomas & M. Short (Eds.), Using corpora for language research. Harlow: Longman, 248–259.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
De Cock, S.
2004 “Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech”, Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures 21, 224–246.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S., & Granger, S.
2010The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-Rom. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S.
2009 “The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13–32.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. & Filipović, L.
2012Criterial Features in L2 English: Specifying the Reference Levels of the Common European Framework. (English Profile Studies Volume 1). Cambridge: UCLES/CUP.Google Scholar
Jones, N. & Saville, N.
2016Learning Oriented Assessment: A systemic approach. (Studies in Language Testing Volume 45). Cambridge: UCLES/CUP.Google Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., & Minegishi, M.
(Eds.) 2012Developmental and Cross-linguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research. (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigle, S. C.
2016Connecting Corpus Linguistics and Language Assessment. Invited colloquium presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics, Orlando/USA, 9–12 April 2016.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J.
2005 “Limitations of the Council of Europe’s Framework of Reference (CEFR) in developing comparable examinations and tests”, Language Testing 22(3), 281–300.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar