Introduction published in:
Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora
Edited by Jürgen Trouvain, Frank Zimmerer, Bernd Möbius, Mária Gósy and Anne Bonneau
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3:2] 2017
► pp. 105117
References

[ p. 116 ]References

Ballier, N., & Martin, Ph
2015 “Speech annotation of learner corpora”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belz, M., Sauer, S., Lüdeling, A., & Mooshammer, C.
this volume. “Fluently disfluent? Pauses and repairs of advanced learners and native speakers of German”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Best, C. T.
1995A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 167–200.Google Scholar
Carranza, M., Cucchiarini, C., Burgos, P., & Strik, H.
2014 “Non-native speech corpora for the development of computer assisted pronunciation training systems”. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies Edulearn 2014. Barcelona: IATED Academy, 3624–3633.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., Avanzi, M., & Herment, S.
(Eds.) 2015Prosody and Language in Contact. L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
2015Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Detey, S., & Racine, I.
this volume. “Towards a perceptually assessed corpus of non-native French: the InterPhonology of Contemporary French (IPFC) project illustrated with a longitudinal study of Japanese learners’ /b-v/ productions”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Díaz-Negrillo, A., Ballier, N., & Thompson, P.
(Eds.) 2013Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Draxler, C.
2008Korpusbasierte Sprachverarbeitung. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Gut, U., & Kristoffersen, G.
(Eds.) 2014Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. (Oxford Handbook of Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E.
1995 “Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 233–272.Google Scholar
García Lecumberri, M. L., Cooke, M., & Wester, M.
this volume. “A bi-directional task-based corpus of learners’ conversational speech”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Gósy, M., Gyarmathy, D., & Beke, A.
this volume. “Phonetic analysis of filled pauses based on a Hungarian-English learner corpus”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F.
(Eds.) 2015The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U.
2012 “The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English”. In T. Schmidt, & K. Wörner (Eds.), Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. this volume. “Phonological development in different learning contexts – a corpus-based study”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Kuhl, P., & Iverson, P.
1995 “Linguistic experience and the ‘perceptual magnet effect’”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 91–120.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O., Alm, M., Schümchen, N., & Fischer, K.
this volume. “Comparing visualization techniques for learning second language prosody – first results”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Quené, H., & Orr, R.
2014Long-term convergence of speech rhythm in L1 and L2 English. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, 342–346. http://​fastnet​.netsoc​.ie​/sp7​/sp7book​.pdf (last accessed 11 July 2017)
Raab, M., Gruhn, R., & Noeth, E.
2007Non-native speech databases. In S. Furui, & T. Kawahara (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU), Kyoto/Japan. 413–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K.
(Eds.) 2012Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., & Minegishi, M.
(Eds.) 2012Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trouvain, J., Bonneau, A., Colotte, V., Fauth, C., Fohr, D., Jouvet, D., Jügler, J., Laprie, Y., Mella, O., Möbius, B., & Zimmerer, F.
2016The IFCASL corpus of French and German non-native and native read speech. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Portorož, 1333–1338. http://​www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2016​/index​.html (last accessed 11 July 2017)
Trouvain, J., & Zimmerer, F.
2016 “Phonetische Lernerkorpora und ihr Nutzen im DaF-Bereich”. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 53(4), 204–212.Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R.
2010 “The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles”. Language and Speech 53(4), 510–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P. Trouvain, J., & Zimmerer, F.
2015 “In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research”. Journal of Phonetics 48, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, F., & Trouvain, J.
2015Productions of /h/ in German: French vs. German speakers. In Möller, S., Ney, H., Möbius, B., Nöth, E., & Steidl, S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), Dresden 1922–1926 http://​www​.isca​-speech​.org​/archive​/interspeech​_2015​/papers​/i15​_1922​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2018. Corpus Pragmatics and Second Language Pragmatics: A Mutualistic Entente in Theory and Practice. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.