Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora
Edited by Jürgen Trouvain, Frank Zimmerer, Bernd Möbius, Mária Gósy and Anne Bonneau
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3:2] 2017
► pp. 105–117
Introduction

Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora

Introduction to the special issue

| Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
| Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
| Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
| Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| LORIA, Nancy, France
Article outline
  • 1.Phonetic learner corpora as a special type of corpora
  • 2.Analysing phonetic learner corpora
    • 2.1Analysing fluency
    • 2.2Analysing prosody
    • 2.3Analysing vowels and consonants
  • 3.Conclusions and outlook
    • 3.1Data size and diversity of user groups
    • 3.2Phenomena of investigation
    • 3.3Availability
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.01tro
References

References

Ballier, N., & Martin, Ph
2015 “Speech annotation of learner corpora”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belz, M., Sauer, S., Lüdeling, A., & Mooshammer, C.
this volume. “Fluently disfluent? Pauses and repairs of advanced learners and native speakers of German”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Best, C. T.
1995 A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 167–200.Google Scholar
Carranza, M., Cucchiarini, C., Burgos, P., & Strik, H.
2014 “Non-native speech corpora for the development of computer assisted pronunciation training systems”. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies Edulearn 2014. Barcelona: IATED Academy, 3624–3633.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., Avanzi, M., & Herment, S.
(Eds.) 2015 Prosody and Language in Contact. L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
2015 Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Negrillo, A., Ballier, N., & Thompson, P.
(Eds.) 2013 Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Draxler, C.
2008 Korpusbasierte Sprachverarbeitung. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Gut, U., & Kristoffersen, G.
(Eds.) 2014 Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. (Oxford Handbook of Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E.
1995 “Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 233–272.Google Scholar
García Lecumberri, M. L., Cooke, M., & Wester, M.
this volume. “A bi-directional task-based corpus of learners’ conversational speech”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Gósy, M., Gyarmathy, D., & Beke, A.
this volume. “Phonetic analysis of filled pauses based on a Hungarian-English learner corpus”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F.
(Eds.) 2015 The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U.
2012 “The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English”. In T. Schmidt, & K. Wörner (Eds.), Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. this volume. “Phonological development in different learning contexts – a corpus-based study”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Kuhl, P., & Iverson, P.
1995 “Linguistic experience and the ‘perceptual magnet effect’”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 91–120.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O., Alm, M., Schümchen, N., & Fischer, K.
this volume. “Comparing visualization techniques for learning second language prosody – first results”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Quené, H., & Orr, R.
2014 Long-term convergence of speech rhythm in L1 and L2 English. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, 342–346. [URL] (last accessed 11 July 2017)
Raab, M., Gruhn, R., & Noeth, E.
2007 Non-native speech databases. In S. Furui, & T. Kawahara (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU), Kyoto/Japan. 413–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K.
(Eds.) 2012 Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., & Minegishi, M.
(Eds.) 2012 Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trouvain, J., Bonneau, A., Colotte, V., Fauth, C., Fohr, D., Jouvet, D., Jügler, J., Laprie, Y., Mella, O., Möbius, B., & Zimmerer, F.
2016 The IFCASL corpus of French and German non-native and native read speech. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Portorož, 1333–1338. [URL] (last accessed 11 July 2017)
Trouvain, J., & Zimmerer, F.
2016 “Phonetische Lernerkorpora und ihr Nutzen im DaF-Bereich”. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 53(4), 204–212.Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R.
2010 “The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles”. Language and Speech 53(4), 510–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P. Trouvain, J., & Zimmerer, F.
2015 “In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research”. Journal of Phonetics 481, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, F., & Trouvain, J.
2015 Productions of /h/ in German: French vs. German speakers. In Möller, S., Ney, H., Möbius, B., Nöth, E., & Steidl, S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), Dresden 1922–1926 [URL]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Gudmestad, Aarnes
2022. Development of grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatics in an additional language: insights from Spanish learner corpus research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Herry-Bénit, Nadine, Stéphanie Lopez, Takeki Kamiyama & Jeff Tennant
2021. The interphonology of contemporary English corpus (IPCE-IPAC). International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2018. Corpus Pragmatics and Second Language Pragmatics: A Mutualistic Entente in Theory and Practice. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Trouvain, Jürgen
2022. Das IFCASL-Korpus als phonetisches Lernerkorpus. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.