Article published in:
Intercultural Pragmatics and Cultural Linguistics
Edited by Ulrike Schröder, Milene Mendes de Oliveira and Hans-Georg Wolf
[International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1] 2020
► pp. 6383


Arundale, R.
(2006) Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8), 2078–2105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, R. B.
(2013) Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics 58, 108–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, L., & Montgomery, B.
(1996) Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(1993) Analysing genre–language use in professional settings. London: Longmann.Google Scholar
(2001) Analyzing genre: Some conceptual issues. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context: Implications and applications (pp. 79–92). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P.
(2006) Solidarity and deference in Spanish computer-mediated communication: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of students’ emails to lecturers. In P. Bou Franch (Ed.), Ways into discourse (pp. 61–79). Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
(1987 [1978]) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W., & Haugh, M.
(2011) Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 43(12), 2948–2963. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W.
(2013) Face and face practices in talk-in-interaction: An empirical analysis of Taiwanese business interactions, PhD thesis, Griffith University.Google Scholar
Dillon, R.
(2015) Respect. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), available at http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/fall2015​/entries​/respect/ date of access April 2nd, 2016.
Dörnyei, Z.
(2007) Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3), 213–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Grainger, K., Mills, S., & Sibanda, M.
(2010) “Just tell us what to do”: Southern African face and its relevance to intercultural communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2158–2171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.
(1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In: S. Sarangi; & C. Robert (Eds.), Talk, work and institutional order (pp. 453–472). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M.
(2013) Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics, 1(1), 46–73.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskés, I.
(2008) Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 385–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Intercultural pragmatics. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: a practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
(1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), 403–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mendes de Oliveira, M.
(2017) Conceptualizations of respect in business negotiations: A research note. International Journal of Language and Culture 4(2), 254–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mendes de Oliveira
(2020) Business negotiations in ELF from a cultural linguistic perspective. [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 43]. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, G.
(1996) Toward a theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, V., & Stephan, W.
(1998) Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brazil and the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(1), 67–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H-G.
(2007) Culture-specific conceptualisations of corruption in African English: Linguistic analyses and pragmatic applications. In F. Sharifian, & G. Palmer (Eds.), Applied cultural linguistics (pp. 125–168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H. G.
(2010) Investigating culture from a linguistic perspective: An exemplification with Hong Kong English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 58(3), 281–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1999) Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 405–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, U.
(2014) The interplay of (im)politeness, conflict styles, rapport management, and metacommunication in Brazilian–German interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(1), 57–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, U.; Mendes de Oliveira, M.; Nascimento, T.
manuscript). The ‘Olympic spirit’ from a cross-cultural perspective: a cognitive-pragmatic analysis.
Sharifian, F.
(2011) Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) (Ed.). Cultural Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, H. E.
(2012) Business development. In D. Teece & M. Augier (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management (pp. 1–2). London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
(2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J., & Feak, C.
(2003) English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E.
(1998) Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems thinker, 9(5), 2–3.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(2003) The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wolf, H.-G.
(2015) Language and culture in intercultural communication. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 445–459). Oxford, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar