Article published In:
International Journal of Language and CultureVol. 11:1 (2024) ► pp.58–94
Bold colors, sweeping melodies, offensive smells
A corpus-based analysis of the figurative representations of visual, auditory, and olfactory stimuli in English and Hungarian
This paper presents a corpus-based exploratory study of the figurative conceptualizations of visual, auditory, and olfactory stimuli in English and Hungarian. Through a manual semantic analysis of altogether 6,800 occurrences of 18 sensory nouns (three per sensory modality in each language) in the TenTen corpora, the following conceptualization types of perceptual stimuli have been examined: reification, agentification, animization, and personification. The paper presents the relative frequencies of these conceptualizations along with their subtypes and concrete linguistic manifestations in English and Hungarian. Among a number of interesting observations that call for further investigations, the following findings merit special attention: (1) visual stimuli have the lowest values in every category; (2) in both languages, agentification is the most typical in the case of olfaction; (3) with the exception of representations of olfactory stimuli as living beings, every conceptualization type is more frequent in the Hungarian data.
Keywords: figurative language, visual perception, auditory perception, olfactory perception, English, Hungarian, TenTen corpora
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Sensory experiences, embodiment, and culture
- 2.2Figurative construal
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1The data
- 3.2The annotation
- 4.Results
- 4.1Reification
- Sensory stimuli as objects
- Sensory stimuli as materials
- Physical effects
- 4.2Agentification
- 4.3Animization and personification
- Specific animizations
- Generic animizations
- Conventionalized and novel personifications
- Metonymic personifications
- Conceptualizations as living beings summed up
- 4.4Above humans in the Great Chain of Being
- 4.1Reification
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (78)
Bagli, M.
(2021) Tastes
we live by. The linguistic conceptualisation of taste in
English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 
Baicchi, A., Digonnet, R., & Sandford, J. L.
(Eds.) (2018) Sensory
perceptions in language, embodiment and
epistemology. Cham: Springer.
Baş, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I.
(Eds.) (2022) Embodiment
in cross-linguistic studies. The ‘eye’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bechtel, F.
(1879) Über
die Bezeichnungen der sinnlichen Wahrnehmungen in den indogermanischen
Sprachen. Weimar: H. Böhlau.
Benczes, R., & Tóth-Czifra, E.
(2014) The
Hungarian colour terms piros and vörös. A corpus and cognitive linguistic
account. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica,
61
(2), 123–152.
Bergen, B. K.
(2012) Louder
than words. The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
(2015) Embodiment,
simulation, and meaning. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of
semantics (pp. 142–157). London: Routledge.
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The
career of metaphor. Psychological
Review,
112
(1), 193–216.
Caballero, R.
(2007) Manner-of-motion
verbs in wine descriptions. Journal of
Pragmatics,
39
(12), 2095–2114.
(2019) Sensory
experiences, meaning and metaphor: The case of wine. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception
metaphors (pp. 127–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cayeux, I., Saint-Léger, C., & Starkenmann, C.
(2023) Trigeminal
sensations to enhance and enrich flavor perception – Sensory approaches. Clinical Nutrition
Open
Science,
47
1, 64–73.
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining
language change. An evolutionary
approach. Harlow: Longman.
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, D.
(1971) Agency. In R. Binkley, R. N. Bronaugh, & A. Marras (Eds.), Agent,
action, and
reason (pp. 1–37). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
de Vignemont, F., & Massin, O.
(2015) Touch. In M. Matthen (Ed.), The
Oxford handbook of philosophy of
perception (pp. 294–313). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Digonnet, R.
(2016) Métaphore
et olfaction : une approche cognitive. Paris: Honoré Champion.
(2018a) The
linguistic expression of smells: from lack to abundance? In A. Baicchi, R. Digonnet, & J. L. Sandford (Eds.), Sensory
perceptions in language, embodiment and
epistemology (pp. 177–191). Cham: Springer.
(2018b) Le
sens hédoniste ou le principe de polarisation dans le discours
sensoriel. In R. Digonnet (Ed.), Pour
une linguistique
sensorielle (pp. 247–273). Paris: Honoré Champion.
(Ed.) (2018c) Pour
une linguistique sensorielle. Paris: Éditions Champion.
Dolscheid, S., Shayan, Sh., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D.
(2013) The
thickness of musical pitch: psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological
Science,
24
1, 613–621.
Dorst, A. G.
(2011) Personification
in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions. Language and
Literature,
20
(2), 113–135.
Dorst, A. G., Mulder, G., & Steen, G. J.
(2011) Recognition
of personifications in fiction by non-expert readers. Metaphor and the Social
World,
1
(2), 174–201.
Dubois, D.
(2000) Categories
as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science
Quarterly,
1
1, 35–68.
Fernández Jaén, J.
(2008) Modalidad
epistémica y sentido del olfato: la evidencialidad del verbo
oler
. ELUA,
22
1, 65–89.
Galac, Á.
(2020) Semantic
change of basic perception verbs in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, and
Hungarian. Argumentum,
16
1, 125–146.
(2021) Basic-level
multimodal perception verbs in French, Spanish, and Hungarian: a contrastive corpus study of Fr. sentir, Sp.
sentir, and H. érez. Alkalmazott
Nyelvtudomány,
21
(2), 62–79.
(2022) Megszemélyesítő
konceptualizációk a látás, hallás és szaglás fogalmi tartományában. Egy kontrasztív empirikus vizsgálat
eredményei. Jelentés és
nyelvhasználat,
9
(1), 155–183.
Geeraerts, D.
(2015) Sense
individuation. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of
semantics (pp. 233–247). London: Routledge.
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F.
(2001) Convention,
form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and
Symbol,
16
(3–4), 223–247.
Gibbs, R. W.
(1999) Taking
metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural
world. In R. W. Gibbs, & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor
in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grady, J. E.
(1997) Foundations
of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes [Doctoral
dissertation, University of California at Berkeley]. eScholarship. [URL]
Grimm, J.
(1848) Die
fünf sinne. Zeitschrift für deutsches
Altertum,
6
1, 1–15.
Győri, G.
(2002) Semantic
change and cognition. Cognitive
Linguistics,
13
(2), 123–166.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(2019) Perception
metaphors in cognitive linguistics. Scope, motivation, and
lexicalisation. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception
metaphors (pp. 43–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jackendoff, R. S.
(1983) Semantics
and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jędrzejowski, Ł., & Staniewski, P.
Johnson, M.
(1987) The
body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and
reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Julich, N.
(2019) Why
do we understand music as moving? The metaphorical basis of musical motion
revisited. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception
metaphors (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Juhász, J., Szőke, I., O. Nagy, G., & Kovalovszky, M.
(Eds.) (1972/2003) Magyar értelmező kéziszótár [Concise Hungarian explanatory
dictionary]. Second, revised
edition. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kimmel, M.
(2008) Properties
of cultural embodiment: Lessons from the anthropology of the
body. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body,
language and mind. Volume 2: Sociocultural
situatedness (pp. 77–108). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kövecses, Z.
(2019) Perception
and metaphor. The case of smell. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception
metaphors (pp. 327–346). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2020) Extended
conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kraska-Szlenk, I.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W.
(1970) Determining
sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological
Measurement,
30
1, 607–610.
Kuzeev, S.
(2022) Ineffability
as a linguistic problem. Studia Linguistica
Hungarica,
34
1, 139–149.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors
we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(1999) Philosophy
in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More
than cool reason. A field guide to poetic
metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations
of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical
prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(2008) Cognitive
grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maalej, Z.
(2004) Figurative
language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and
Symbol,
19
(1), 51–75.
(2008) The
heart and cultural embodiment in Tunisian Arabic. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture,
body, and language: Conceptualisations of internal body organs across cultures and
languages (pp. 395–428). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C.
(2011) The
senses in language and culture. The Senses and
Society,
6
(1), 5–18.
Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan, B., de Sousa, H., Cansler, B. L., Shayan, Sh., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R. A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Ozturk, O., . . . Levinson, S. C.
(2018) Differential
coding of perception in the world’s
languages. PNAS,
115
(45), 11369–11376.
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N.
(2014) Let’s
talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and
Symbol,
29
(4), 298–315.
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) A
practical and flexible method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor
and
Symbol,
22
(1), 1–39.
Rogers, A.
(1971) Three
kinds of physical perception verbs. 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society, 206–222.
Rundell, M., & Fox, G.
(Eds.) (2002) Macmillan
English dictionary for advanced
learners. London: Macmillan Education.
Sharifian, F.
(2008) Distributed,
emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation and language. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body,
language and mind. Vol 2. Sociocultural
situatedness (pp. 109–136). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S.
(Eds.) (2008) Culture,
body, and language. Conceptualizations of internal body organs across
cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Simon, G.
(2022) Identification
and analysis of personification in Hungarian: The PerSECorp
project. In N. Calzolari, F. Béchet, P. Blache, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, H. Isahara, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings
of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation
Conference (pp. 2730–2738). Marseille: European Language Resources Association. URL: [URL]
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A.
(2019) Grounding
language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell. Cognitive
Neuropsychology,
37
(5–6), 363–392.
Speed, L. J., O’Meara, C., San Roque, L., & Majid, A.
Staniewski, P.
(2016) Das
Unantastbare beschreiben. Gerüche und ihre Versprachlichung im Deutschen und
Polnischen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Steen, G. J.
(2008) The
paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and
Symbol,
23
(4), 213–241.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T.
(2010) A
method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to
MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Szwedek, A.
Tóth, M.
(2023) A
case for metonymic synesthesia. Describing olfactory stimuli in terms of taste adjectives in
German. Review of Cognitive
Linguistics,
21
1, in press.
Trojszczak, M.
(2019) Grounding
mental metaphors in touch. A corpus-based study of English and
Polish. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception
metaphors (pp. 209–230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Viberg, Å.
(1983) The
verbs of perception: A typological
study. Linguistics,
21
(1), 123–162.
(2001) Verbs
of perception. In M. Haspelmath (Ed.), Language
typology and language
universals (pp. 1294–1309). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2021) Why
is smell special? A case study of a European language:
Swedish. In Ł. Jędrzejowski, & P. Staniewski (Eds.), The
linguistics of
olfaction (pp. 35–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Winter, B.
(2019b) Synaesthetic
metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, A. Majid (Eds.), Perception
metaphors (pp. 105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wood, F. A.
(1899) The
semasiology of words for ‘smell’ and
‘see’. PMLA,
14
(3), 299–346.
Yamamoto, M.
(1999) Animacy
and reference. A cognitive approach to corpus
linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yu, N.
(2015) Embodiment,
culture, and language. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of language and
culture (pp. 227–239). London: Routledge.
Zawisławska, M. & Falkowska, M.
(2021) Typology
of metaphors with the olfactory target domain in the Polish perfumery
discourse. In Ł. Jędrzejowski, & P. Staniewski (Eds.), The
linguistics of
olfaction (pp. 449–474). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.