Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.351–387

Idea-based and image-based linguacultures

Evidence from American English and Mandarin Chinese

 | CBS, Denmark
 | Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
In order to investigate whether or not cultural cognitive differences between Western and East Asian countries should be taken seriously we compared the empirical results from studies of perception and cognition involving primarily American and Chinese people to linguistic data from exactly the same areas in American English and Mandarin Chinese. What we found were systematic language parallels to the perceptual and cognitive differences found in empirical studies. Our linguistic analysis did not only reveal that the differences should be taken seriously, but also that it seems to be possible to trace them back to different perspectives involved: The Anglo-American culture has an idea-based perspective, while the Mandarin Chinese culture has an image-based perspective to what appears to be a common basis for both Americans and Chinese in all other respects. The difference in perspective is, for instance, reflected in the two very different writing systems.
Keywords: The West and the East, perception, cognition, image, idea, perspective, American English and Mandarin Chinese linguacultures
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basic differences between English and Chinese
    • 2.1Preliminary remarks
    • 2.2The two writing systems
    • 2.3The two grammatical systems
    • 2.4Reading research
  • 3.Categorizing from the point of view of an idea or an image
    • 3.1Making sense of objects
    • 3.2Language parallels – The word as an image-idea pair
    • 3.3Idea-based vs. image-based
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.Perceiving an entity in an absolute or relative way
    • 4.1Perceptual judgements
    • 4.2Language parallels
    • 4.3Summary
  • 5.Perceiving a complex scene in a local or global way
    • 5.1Introducing perception of visual scenes
      • 5.1.1Verbal description
      • 5.1.2Change detection
      • 5.1.3Eye tracking
      • 5.1.4Aesthetics: Preferred way of framing things
    • 5.2Language parallels
      • 5.2.1Word frequency
      • 5.2.2Word order in text-initial utterances
      • 5.2.3Other pieces of evidence for different perception strategies
        • Introducing yourself in American English and Chinese
        • How to write an address in American English and Chinese
        • How to present time in American English and Chinese
    • 5.3Summary
  • 6.Cognizing in an abstract or concrete way
    • 6.1Cognition and reasoning
      • 6.1.1Logical reasoning
      • 6.1.2Causal reasoning
      • 6.1.3Dialectical reasoning
    • 6.2Language parallels
      • 6.2.1Logical reasoning: Image-based and idea-based thinking
      • 6.2.2Causal and dialectical reasoning
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 24 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.17011.dur
References (87)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 531, 285–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. C. & Schiffrin, J. C. (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & j. t. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 89–195. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, I. & Herslund, M. (2005). Langues endocentriques et langues exocentriques. Approche typologique du danois, du français et de l’anglais. In M. Herslund & I. Baron (eds.), Le génie de la langue française. Perspectives typologiques et contrastives. [Special edition]. Langue française 1451, 35–53.Google Scholar
Barratt, D. (2014). The geography of film viewing: What are the implications of cultural-cognitive differences for cognitive film theory? In T. Nannicelli & P. Taberham (Eds.), AFI Film Reader in Cognitive Media Theory (pp. 62–82). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 221, 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentsen, S. E. (2018). The comprehension of English texts by native speakers of English and Japanese, Chinese and Russian speakers of English as a Lingua Franca: An empirical study. Doctoral thesis. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
Boland, J. E., Chua, H. F., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). How we see it: Culturally different eye movement patterns over visual scenes. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (eds.), Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements (pp. 363–378). Tianjin, CH: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Castelhano, M. S. & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements during reading, visual search, and scene perception: An overview. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (eds.), Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements (pp. 3–33). Tianjin, CH: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., & House, R. J. (eds.) (2008). Culture and leadership across the world. The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. New York/Abingdon: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chiu, L. H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 71, 235–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 1251, 47–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 1021, 12629–12633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research 1691, 323–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durst-Andersen, P. (2009). The grammar of linguistic semiotics. Reading Peirce in a modern linguistic light. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 161, 38–79.Google Scholar
(2011). Linguistic supertypes. A cognitive-semiotic theory of human communication. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). What languages tell us about the structure of the human mind. Cognitive Computation, 41, 82–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, K., Rotello, C. M., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2009). Scene perception and memory revealed by eye movements and receiver-operating characteristic analyses: Does a cultural difference truly exist? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 621, 276–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development, 641, 637–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, D. G. & Kao, H. S. R. (2002). Psycho-geometric analysis of commonly used Chinese characters. In H. S. R. Kao & D. G. Gao (eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 195–206). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Gerlach, C. (2008). Visual object recognition and category specificity. Post-doctoral dissertation. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Category-specificity in visual object recognition. Cognition, 1111, 281–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1976/1997). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Han, X. (2009). Maybe There Are No Subject-Predicate Sentences in Chinese. Dao, 8(3), 277–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 421, 335–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., Markus, H. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(1), 12–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herslund, M. & Baron, I. (2003). Language as world view. Endocentric and exocentric representations of reality. In I. Baron (ed.), Language and culture. [= Copenhagen Studies in Languages 29 ], 29–42. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, J. M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.) (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Hu, J., & Pan, H. (2008). Focus and the basic function of Chinese existential you-sentences. In Comorovski, I., & Von Heusinger, K. (Eds.) Existence: Semantics and syntax (Vol. 841). (pp. 133–145). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, K., Masuda, T., & Hioki, K. (2012). Affective information in context and judgment of facial expression: Cultural similarities and variations in context effects between North Americans and East Asians. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(3), 429–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, L., Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 781, 943–955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, reasoning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Ph. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). Space to think. In P. Bloom et al. (eds.), Language and space, 437–462. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 861, 65–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at New Look. Psychological Science, 141, 201–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W., Li, P. & Hendriks, H. (2000). Aspect and assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 181, 723–770. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Williams, C. C., Cave, K. R., & Well, A. R., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements, individual differences, and cultural effects. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (eds.), Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements (pp. 379–393). Tianjin, CH: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lin, J-W. (2003). Aspectual selection and negation in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics, 411, 425–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Time in a language without tense: the case of Chinese. Journal of semantics, 231, 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 281, 1213–1227.Google Scholar
Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P. C., Mesquita, B., Leu, J., Tanida, S., & Van de Veerdonk, E. V. (2008). Placing the face in context: Cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 365–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 341, 1260–1275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masuda, T., Ishii, K., & Kimura, J. (2016). When does the culturally dominant mode of attention appear or disappear? Comparing patterns of eye movement during the visual flicker task between European Canadians and Japanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 811, 922–934. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 301, 381–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKone, E., Davies, A. A., Fernando, D., Aalders, R., Leung, H., Wickramariyaratne, T., & Platow, M. J. (2010). Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention. Vision Research, 501, 1540–1549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mo, T. (1986). An insular possession. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W. & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 671, 949–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nand, K., Masuda, T., Senzaki, S., & Ishii, K. (2014). Examining cultural drifts in artworks through history and development: cultural comparisons between Japanese and western landscape paintings and drawings. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, Article 1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 1001, 11163–11170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 91, 467–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 1081, 291–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishida, H. (1999). Cultural Schema Theory: In W. B. Gudykunst (ed.), Theorizing About Intercultural Communication, 401–418. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture and causal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 91, 132–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 261, 653–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1998. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings Volume 2 (1893–1913), ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. E. (1997). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in the understanding of physical causality. In M. Shield (ed.), Proceedings of conference on culture and science. Kentucky, KY: Kentucky State University Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 541, 741–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, A. (2006). Motion verbs in Chinese. A diachronic study of directional complements. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages. Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (121–135). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Li, X., Williams, C. C., Cave, K. R., & Well, A. R. (2007). Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Research, 471, 2714–2726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 81, 368–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 251, 31–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, E. (1915). Synsoplevede Figurer: Studier i psykologisk Analyse. Første Del [Visually experienced figures: Studies in psychological analysis. Part one]. Copenhagen and Christiania: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. An introduction to the study of speech. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schweppe, J. & Rummer, R. (2014). Attention, working memory, and long-term memory in multimedia learning: An integrated perspective based on process models of working memory. Education and Psychology Review 26 (2), 285–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senzaki, S., Masuda, T., & Ishii, K. (2014). When is perception top-down and when is it not? Culture, narrative, and attention. Cognitive Science, 381, 1493–1506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senzaki, S., Masuda, T., & Nand, K. (2014). Holistic versus analytic expressions in artworks: Cross- cultural differences and similarities in drawings and collages by Canadian and Japanese school-age children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(8), 1297–1316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2017a). Cultural linguistics and linguistic relativity. Language Sciences, 591, 83–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (2017b). Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardif, T., Gelman, S. A., & Xu, F. (1999). Putting the “noun bias” in context: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development, 701, 620–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Trompenaars, F., & Woolliams, P. (2003). Business across cultures. West Sussex, UK: Capstone Publishing.Google Scholar
Tsang, Y. K. & Chen, H. C. (2008). Eye movements in reading Chinese. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (eds.), Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements (pp. 237–254). Tianjin, CH: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. J., Sears, C. R., & Pexman, P. M. (2005). Cultural influences on categorization processes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(6), 662–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2007). Construal and perspectivisation. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A. (1967). A cognitive-style approach to cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 21, 233–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, J-S. (2005). The semantics of the perfective le and its context-dependency: an SDRT approach. Journal of East Asian linguistics, 141, 299–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Z. & McEnery, A. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: a corpus-based study. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C. H. E. N. (2007). The distributional sequence and motivation of lai and qu as complex directional complement [J]. Contemporary Linguistics, 1, 004.Google Scholar
Yip, P-C. (2000). The Chinese lexicon. A comprehensive survey. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Collin, Finn & Per Durst‐Andersen
2024. Reductivism versus perspectivism versus holism: A key theme in philosophy of science, and its application to modern linguistics. Theoria 90:1 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Latić, Denisa, Frank Polzenhagen, Hans‐Georg Wolf & Arne Peters
2024. A research bibliography for world Englishes and Cultural Linguistics. World Englishes 43:3 ► pp. 523 ff. DOI logo
Durst-Andersen, Per & Stine Evald Bentsen
2021. The word revisited: Introducing the CogSens Model to integrate semiotic, linguistic, and psychological perspectives. Semiotica 2021:238 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Durst-Andersen, Per & Xia Zhang
2021. Chinese as a Mother Tongue in the Context of Global English Business Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Durst-Andersen, Per & Xia Zhang
2022. Chinese as a Mother Tongue in the Context of Global English Business Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 935 ff. DOI logo
Durst-Andersen, Per & Xia Zhang
2022. Chinese as a Mother Tongue in the Context of Global English Business Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.