How universal is UN ‘peace’?
A comparative linguistic analysis of the United Nations and Giryama (Kenya) concepts of ‘peace’
It is now commonly accepted that, for the sake of international peace, the provisions of the UN Charter (originally devised to regulate interstate wars) should be interpreted so as to allow for intrastate interference as well. Yet the UN Charter does not explicitly state what the term peace refers to. It seems that the concept underpinning this term is so much the norm that only deviations from it are marked and therefore noteworthy or definable. Still, in view of the wide array of UN peacekeeping missions all over the world, a clear notion of ‘peace’ could make an important contribution to the success of these missions. In view of this, the paper addresses two questions: what lies behind the concept of ‘peace’ embedded in UN discourse, and how internationally salient is it? To provide the necessary perspective, we undertake a comparative analysis of the UN and Giryama (Kenya) ‘peace’ concepts. The analysis aims to highlight those aspects of Giryama and UN ‘peace’ that are characteristically ‘socially meaningful’ and concludes by highlighting convergences and divergences between them.
References (16)
Agenda (1992). An agenda for peace. Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping: Report of the Secretary General pursuant to the statement adopted by the summit meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. New York: United Nations.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, R. (2004). A definition of peace. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10(2), 101–116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Wet, E. (2004). The Chapter VII powers of the United Nations Security Council. Oxford: Hart.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Galtung, J., & Fischer, D. (2013). Johan Galtung: Pioneer of peace research. Heidelberg: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krijtenburg, F. (2007). Cultural ideologies of peace and conflict: A socio-cognitive study of Giryama discourse (Kenya). PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mac Ginty, R. (2013). Indicators +: A proposal for everyday peace indicators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 36(1), 56–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Outcome (2005). World Summit Outcome: Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly, 24 October 2005, A/RES/60/1. Retrieved from: [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peeters, B. (2013). Language and cultural values: Towards an applied ethnolinguistics for the foreign language classroom. In B. Peeters, K. Mullan, & C. Béal (Eds.), Cross-culturally speaking, speaking cross-culturally (pp. 231–259). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schäffner, C., & Wenden, A.L. (1995). Language and peace. Amsterdam: Harwood.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selby, J. (2013). The myth of liberal peace-building. Conflict, Security and Development, 13(1), 57–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Supplement (1995). Supplement to an agenda for peace: A position paper of the Secretary-General on the occasion of the fiftieth birthday of the United Nations. New York: United Nations.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
UN Charter (1945). Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945. Retrieved from: [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webel, C. (2007). Introduction: Toward a philosophy and metapsychology of peace. In C. Webel, & J. Galtung (Eds.), Handbook of peace and conflict studies (pp. 3–13). London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, A. (2013). Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolfrum, R. (2012). Purposes and definitions. In B. Simma, D.-E. Khan, G. Nolte, & A. Paulus (Eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A commentary (pp. 39–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
M. van Iterson Scholten, Gijsbert
2024.
Peace beyond the Absence of War: Three Trends in the Study of Positive Peace. In
New Perspectives on Global Peace [Working Title],
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
van Iterson Scholten, Gijsbert M.
2020.
Peace in Peace Studies: Beyond the ‘Negative/Positive’ Divide. In
Visions of Peace of Professional Peace Workers [
Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies, ],
► pp. 27 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wolf, Hans-Georg
2017.
De-escalation—A Cultural-Linguistic View on Military English and Military Conflicts. In
Advances in Cultural Linguistics [
Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 683 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.