Article published in:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 3:1 (2016) ► pp. 5667
References

References

Aikhenvald, A.Y.
(2000) Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2016) Gender, shape, and sociality: How humans are special in Manambu. International Journal of Language and Culture, 3(1).Google Scholar
Alvanoudi, A.
(2014) Grammatical gender in interaction: Cultural and cognitive aspects. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The routine achievement of gender in Greek conversation. Gender and Language, 9(1), 11–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, R.E.
(1985) Tamil. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Austin, P.
(1981) A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, B.
(2000) Grammar and social practice: The role of ‘culture’ in linguistic relativity. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 161–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, F.
(1938) Language. In F. Boas (Ed.), General anthropology (pp. 124–145). Boston, New York: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Borba, R., & Ostermann, A.C.
(2007) Do bodies matter? Travestis’ embodiment of (trans)gender identity through the manipulation of the Brazilian Portuguese grammatical system. Gender and Language, 1(1), 131–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L.A., & Phillips, W.
(2003) Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in the mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 61–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Braun, F.
(2001) The communication of gender in Turkish. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 283–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G.G.
(1991) Gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
(1972) The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Basic linguistic theory, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doleschal, U., & Schmid, S.
(2001) Doing gender in Russian: Structure and perspective. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 253–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J.
(2000) On linguocentrism. In M. Pütz & M. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in linguistic relativity (pp. 125–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engelberg, Μ.
(2002) The communication of gender in Finnish. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 109–132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forker, D.
(2016) Gender in Hinuq and other Nakh-Daghestanian languages. International Journal of Language and Culture, 3(1).Google Scholar
Hall, K., & O’Donovan, V.
(1996) Shifting gender positions among Hindi-speaking hijras. In V. Bergvall, J. Bing, & A. Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 228–266). London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
(1982) African noun class systems. In H. Seiler & C. Lehmann (Eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, Teil I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene (pp. 189–216). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hellinger, M., & Bussmann, H.
(2001) Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2001-2003) Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, C.
(2005) Speaking as a heterosexual: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 221–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M., Panther, K.-U., & Zubin, D.A.
(2010) Motivating grammatical and conceptual gender agreement in German. In H.-J. Schmid & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns (pp. 171–194). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1994) Culture, cognition and grammar. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Language contact and language conflict (pp. 25–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathiot, M.
(1979) Sex roles as revealed through referential gender in American English. In M. Mathiot (Ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf revisited (pp. 1–47). The Hague/Paris/New York: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Mills, S.
(2008) Language and sexism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, U.K.
(2002) Gender in Spanish: Tradition and innovation. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 251–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1992) Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, G.B.
(1996) Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pavlidou, T.-S.
(2015) Gendering selves, gendering others-in (Greek) interaction. Gender and Language, 9(1), 105–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlidou, T.-S., & Alvanoudi, A.
(2013) Grammatical gender and cognition. In N. Lavidas, T. Alexiou, & A.M. Sougari (Eds.), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics, 2(2) (pp. 109–124). Versita/de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sarvasy, H.
(2016) Sexless babies, sexed grandparents: Nungon gendered person terms. International Journal of Language and Culture, 3(1).Google Scholar
Schulz, M.R.
(1975) The semantic derogation of woman. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 64–75). Rowley, MA: Newbury house.Google Scholar
Sera, M.D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M.C., Rodriguez, W., & Dubois, D.P.
(2002) When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 131(3), 377–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F.
(2011) Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Cultural linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I.
(1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in the mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Speer, S.A., & Stokoe, E.
(Eds.) (2011) Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubin, D.A., & Köpcke, K.M.
(1981) Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April (pp. 16–18). Chicago: The Society.
Zubin, D., & Köpcke, K.M.
(1984) Affect classification in the German gender system. Lingua, 63, 41–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Gender and folk taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical and lexical categorization. In C. Craig (Ed.), Typological Studies in Language vol. 7: Νοun classes and categorization: Symposium on categorization and noun classification, Eugene, Oregon, 1983 (pp. 139–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tosi, Carolina
2021. Linguistic Traces of Subjectivity and Dissent. A Discursive Analysis of Inclusive Language in Argentina. Frontiers in Sociology 6 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.