Cover not available
Article published In:
Emotions across Languages and Cultures
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Ad Foolen
[International Journal of Language and Culture 4:1] 2017
► pp. 73–99

Multiplicity of motivation behind dynamic descriptions of emotion in Estonian

 | Institute of the Estonian Language
The rich variety of emotion descriptions in terms of motion verbs found in standard Estonian was studied in respect of their general motivation and some specific motivating factors, such as conceptual structures and cognitive mechanisms. The possibilities of being a relatively late cultural loan and a direct influence of the humoral theory were both rejected, because of the discovered abundance of semi-schematic patterns and the lack of prominence of patterns related to the specific motion of body fluids. The universalistic account of bodily experience was considered to be the most powerful available explanation. The generalised embodied understanding of emotion in terms of motion was revealed by (a) the rich variety of conceptual metaphors and metonymies that were used (often simultaneously), and (b) how well they fit into the three-stage cognitive model of a typical emotion scenario. Gradual deliteralization of the verbs’ meanings is also a plausible mechanism at work because the semantic abstractness of a motion verb was found to be a function of the nature of the entities filling the slots in the semi-schematic patterns.
Keywords: embodiment, emotion, Estonian, conceptual metaphors, motion verbs, metonymy, motivation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Selection of the material and methods
  • 3.Spread of dynamic descriptions
    • 3.1Motion-emotion co-occurrences
    • 3.2Semantic and syntactic patterns
    • 3.3Conclusions about the spread of the dynamic descriptions
  • 4.Embodied dynamic understanding
    • 4.1Beginning of an emotion
    • 4.2Emotion exists
    • 4.3Emotional response
    • 4.4Conclusions about embodied dynamic understanding
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.4.1.05vai
References (26)
References
Bamberg, M. (1997). Emotion talk(s). The role of perspective in the construction of emotions. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), The Language of emotions. Conceptualisation, expression and theoretical foundation (pp. 209–225). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloem, A. (2012). (E)motion in the XVIIth century. A closer look at the changing semantics of the French verbs émouvoir and mouvoir . In A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others. Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 407–422). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor and talk. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 197–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EED= (2009). Langemets, M., Tiits, M., Valdre, T., Veskis, L., Viks, Ü., & Voll, P. (Eds.). Eesti keele seletav sõnaraamat [The explanatory dictionary of Estonian] (Vol. I–VI1). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2009). Deliteralization and the birth of emotion. A presentation held at Workshop of the FOCUS Foundation. Serock, Poland. Slides retrieved from [URL].
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor and R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–179). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Embodiment, experiential focus, and diachronic change in metaphor. In R. W. McConchie et al. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis (pp.1–7). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2008). Metaphor and emotion. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 380–395). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Maalej, Z. (2004). Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 51–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metsmägi, I., Sedrik, M., & Soosaar, S.-E. (2012). Eesti etümoloogiasõnaraamat [The etymological dictionary of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Google Scholar
Ross, K. (2011). Historical aspects of Estonian Bible translation and the formation of biblical terminology from the Middle Ages up to the 18th century. Magyar Terminológia, 11, 19–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 121, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainik, E. (2002). Emotions, emotion terms and emotion concepts in an Estonian folk model. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(4), 322–341.Google Scholar
(2011). The dynamic body parts in the Estonian figurative descriptions of emotions. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures (pp. 41–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and symbolic activity, 10(2), 59–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, M., & Magnusson, U. (2012). Metaphor and subjective experience: A study of motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian, and Thai. In A. Foolen et al. (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others. Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 423–450). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar