Suffixation and sequentiality
Notes on the study of morphology in interaction
Chase Wesley Raymond | University of Colorado, Boulder
This paper offers some reflections on the study of morphology – broadly speaking, ‘word formation’ – as a
participants’ resource in social interaction. I begin by calling attention to morphology as a comparatively underexamined
component of linguistic structure by conversation analysts and interactional linguists, in that it has yet to receive the same
dedicated consideration as have, e.g., phonetics and syntax. I then present an ongoing study of suffixes/suffixation in Spanish –
focusing on diminutives (e.g., –ito), augmentatives (e.g., –ote), and superlatives (i.e.,
–ísimo) – and describe how the sequentiality of interaction can offer analysts profound insight into
participants’ orientations to morphological resources. With what I refer to as ‘morphological transformations’ – exemplified here
in both same-turn and next-turn positions – interactants sequentially construct and expose morphological complexity as such,
locally instantiating its relevance in the service of action. It is argued that a focus on transformations therefore provides
analysts with a means to ‘break into’ morphology-based collections. A range of cases are presented to illustrate this
methodological approach, before a concluding discussion in which I describe how morphology-focused investigations may intersect
with explorations of other interactional phenomena.
Keywords: morphology, grammar, conversation, Spanish, diminutives, augmentatives, superlatives, methods/methodology, conversation analysis (CA), interactional linguistics (IL)
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Linguistic structure in action
- 2.1The ‘P-side’
- 2.2The ‘S-side’
- 2.3What about morphology?
- 2.3.1Morphology: The basics
- 2.3.2Morphology in CA/IL research
- 2.3.3What about ‘Morphosyntax’ (and ‘Morphophonology’)?
- 3.Opening up morphology in action
- 3.1Evaluative suffixes in Spanish: Building a collection
- 3.2Explicit orientations
- 4.Sequential morphological transformations
- 4.1Sequentiality as a resource
- 4.2Suffixation in next-turn
- 4.3Suffixation within the same turn
- 5.Discussion and next steps
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 13 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21012.ray
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21012.ray
References
Barbaresi, L. M., & Dressler, W. U.
Barth-Weingarten, D., Küttner, U.-A., & Raymond, C. W.
Bolden, G. B.
Bolden, G. B., & Robinson, J. D.
Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J.
Clayman, S. E., & Raymond, C. W.
Clift, R., & Raymond, C. W.
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Etelämäki, M.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ono, T.
Curl, T. S.
Curl, T. S., & Drew, P.
Deppermann, A.
Deppermann, A., & De Stefani, E.
Dressler, W. U.
Dressler, W. U., & Barbaresi, L. M.
Drew, P.
Drew, P., & Holt, E.
Drew, P., Walker, T., & Ogden, R.
Dryer, M. S.
(2008) Polar
questions. In M. Haspelmath, et al. (Eds.), The
World Atlas of Language Structures
Online, vol. 1161. Max Planck Digital Library. Available at: http://wals.info/feature/116
Egbert, M.
Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T., Brown, P., Englert, C., Harjunpää, K., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., Raymond, C. W., Rossano, F., Yoon, K.-E., Zwitserlood, I., & Levinson, S. C.
Escobar, A. M.
Ford, C. E.
Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A.
Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A.
Fox, B. A.
Fox, B. A., & Heinemann, T.
Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A.
Fox, B. A., Wouk, F., Fincke, S., Hernandez Flores, W., Hayashi, M., Laakso, M., Maschler, Y., Mehrabi, A., Sorjonen, M.-L., Uhmann, S., & Yang, H. J.
Gaarder, A. B.
Gill, V. T., Halkowski, T., & Roberts, F.
Gill, V. T., & Maynard, D. W.
Givón, T.
Goodwin, C.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H.
Goodwin, M. H.
Grandi, N., & Körtvélyessy, L.
Günthner, S.
Hakulinen, A., & Selting, M.
Harjunpää, K., Deppermann, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
Haspelmath, M.
Hayashi, M.
Helmer, H.
Helmer, H., & Zinken, J.
Heritage, J.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, C. W.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
Iwasaki, S.
Keevallik, L.
Kendrick, K. H., Brown, P., Dingemanse, M., Floyd, S., Gipper, S., Hayano, K., Hoey, E., Hoymann, G., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Levinson, S. C.
Körtvélyessy, L.
Laury, R.
Laury, R., & Ono, T.
Laury, R., & Suzuki, R.
Local, J.
Local, J., & Walker, G.
MacWhinney, B.
Mandelbaum, J.
Marrese, O. M., Raymond, C. W., Fox, B. A., Ford, C. E., & Pielke, M.
Martín Zorraquino, M. A.
Maschler, Y., Pekarek Doehler, S., Lindström, L., & Keevallik, L.
Maynard, D. W.
Mondada, L.
Montes Giraldo, J. J.
Mushin, I., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
Norén, N., & Linell, P.
Ochs, E.
Ogden, R.
Ogden, R., & Walker, T.
Pekarek Doehler, S.
Pfänder, S., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
Pomerantz, A. M.
Prieto, V. M.
(2005) Spanish
evaluative morphology: Pragmatic, sociolinguistic, and semantic issues. Ph.D.
dissertation, University of Florida.
Raymond, C. W.
(2015a) Dialectos,
identidades y tratamientos en el discurso cotidiano: Un argumento concreto a favor de los métodos mixtos en las
investigaciones dialectológicas y sociolingüísticas. In J. Rodríguez & M. Pérez (Eds.), Amicitia
Fecunda: Estudios en Homenaje a Claudia
Parodi (pp. 213–234). Madrid: Iberoamericana.
Raymond, C. W., Clift, R., & Heritage, J.
Raymond, C. W., & Fox, B. A.
Raymond, C. W., & Heritage, J.
Raymond, C. W., Olguín, L. M.
Raymond, C. W., Robinson, J. D., Fox, B. A., Thompson, S. A., & Montiegel, K.
Raymond, G.
Robinson, J. D.
Rossi, G.
Sacks, H.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
Schegloff, E. A.
Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E., & Thompson, S. A.
Selting, M.
Sorjonen, M.-L., Raevaara, L., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
Stevanovic, M.
Stivers, T.
Stivers, T., & Hayashi, M.
Szczepek Reed, B.
Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
Tanaka, H.
Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
Vázquez Carranza, A.
Walker, G.
Walker, T., Drew, P., & Local, J.
Zinken, J.
Zinken, J., & Deppermann, A.
Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K.