Cover not available
Part of
Iconicity: East meets West
Edited by Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara and Kimi Akita
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 14] 2015
► pp. 35–53

Iconicity of logic - and the roots of "iconicity" concept

It seems to be a standard assumption that Charles Morris originated the concept of “iconicity” on the basis of Peirce’s icon-index-symbol discussion. This paper locates the origin in Peirce himself, in the context of judging the merits of different mathematical and logic representations – the more iconic such representations generally being preferable to less iconic ones, for scientific purposes. In Peirce’s Collected Papers, “iconicity” occurs in the discussion of different conventions in the logic representation system called “Existential Graphs”. This paper provides the context of logic representations in order to show how Peirce’s articulation of the concept of “iconicity” comes out of the attempt to find as iconic a way as possible to depict logical relations. Moreover, this indicates a use of “iconicity”, from the very beginning, which addresses not only similarities between different visual representations – but also visual representations of abstract contents.
Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.14.02stj
References (27)
Anellis, I.H. 1995. Peirce rustled, Russell pierced: How Charles Peirce and Betrand Russell viewed each other’s work in logic, and an assessment of Russell’s accuracy and role in the historiography of logic. Modern Logic 5: 270–328.Google Scholar
. 2012. How Peircean was the ‘Fregean’ revolution in logic? Working Paper. <[URL]> (10 July 2013).
Bellucci, F. 2013. Diagrammatic reasoning: Some notes on Charles S. Peirce and Friedrich A. Lange. History and Philosophy of Logic 34(4): 293–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dau, F. 2011a. Ligatures in Peirce’s existential graphs. Semiotica 186 (1–4): 89–109.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Die Ikonizität der Peirceschen Existentiellen Graphen aus der Sicht der Formalen Logik. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 31(3–4), 2009–2011.Google Scholar
Morris, C. 1946. Signs, Language, and Behavior. New York NY: Prentice-Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nöth, W. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. 1976. New Elements of Mathematics [referred to as NEM], C. Eisele (ed) I–IV. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1998 [1931–58]. Collected Papers [CP, references given by volume and paragraph numbers], I–VIII, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (eds); W. Burks (ed). London: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
. Undated. Manuscripts at the Houghton Library referred to by Ms. numbers in the Microfilm edition 1966 The Charles S. Peirce Papers, Microfilm Edition, Thirty Reels with Two Supplementary Reels Later Added. Cambridge: Harvard University Library Photographic Service, numbers simultaneously referring to the Robin catalogue of the Mss. (Robin 1967, 1971). As to manuscript page numbers, reference is to Peirce’s pagination (which is not unanimous since several parallel drafts may belong to the same Ms.)
Pietarinen, A.-V. 2006. Signs of Logic. Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
. 2011. Existential graphs: What a diagrammatic logic of cognition might look like. History and Philosophy of Logic 32: 265–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Some myths about EGs. <[URL]>
. In prep. The genesis of Peirce’s beta part of existential graphs. <[URL]>
Putnam, H. 1982. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Queiroz, J. & Stjernfelt, F. (eds). 2011. Special Issue of Semiotica on Diagrammatical Reasoning and Peircean Logic Representations 186(1–4).Google Scholar
Roberts, D.D. 1973. The Existential Graphs of C. S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Robin, R. 1967. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
. 1971. The Peirce papers: A supplementary catalogue. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 7(1): 37–57.Google Scholar
Sebeok, T.A. 1979. The Sign and Its Masters. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Shin, S.-J. 1994. The Logical Status of Diagrams. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2000. The Iconic Logic of Peirce’s Graphs. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Visualization of quantificational logic. Paper presented at the Extended Problem Solving Conference, Aarhus University, January 2013.
Sonesson, G. 1999. Aniconic visual signs. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, F. 2007. Diagrammatology. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
. 2014. Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston MA: Docent Press.Google Scholar
Zeman, J. 1964. The Graphical Logic of C. S. Peirce. <[URL]> (8 December 2013).
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Боброва, Ангелина Сергеевна
2024. Mental models and existential graphs: How to define a rule. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics :2(40) ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Stjernfelt, Frederik & Markus Pantsar
2023. Peirce’s philosophy of notations and the trade-offs in comparing numeral symbol systems. Cognitive Semiotics 16:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Stjernfelt, Frederik
2018. Signs Conveying Information. In Empirical Research on Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric [Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies, ], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Stjernfelt, Frederik
2019. Dimensions of Peircean diagrammaticality. Semiotica 2019:228 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Stjernfelt, Frederik
2021. Conscious self-control as criterion for reasoning. Cognitive Semiotics 14:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Stjernfelt, Frederik
2024. Peirce’s Theories of Generalized Propositions. In The Oxford Handbook of Charles S. Peirce, ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.