Article published in:
Iconicity: East meets West
Edited by Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara and Kimi Akita
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 14] 2015
► pp. 109–123

What’s in a mimetic?

On the dynamicity of its iconic stem

| Kyoto Sangyo University
| Osaka University

This paper explores the fundamental semantic and syntactic properties of Japanese mimetic lexemes as iconic signs that depict various eventualities by means of linguistic sound. We argue how the two central features of mimetics – stem-based morphology and dynamicity – restrict their morphosyntactic and semantic realizations. The discussion on the impossible uses of mimetics, such as intrinsically static adjectival expressions and object-oriented depictives, particularly clarifies the limits of the traditional root-based analysis of mimetic morphology and sets the basis for its theoretical treatment.

Published online: 12 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.14.06usu
References
Aarts, B
1992 Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types [Topics in English Linguistics 8]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abbi, A
1994 Semantic Universals in Indian Languages. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Google Scholar
Ahlner, F. & Jordan, Z
2010 Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38(1–4): 298–348.Google Scholar
Akita, K
2009 A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics. PhD dissertation, Kobe University.
2014. Register-specific morphophonological constructions in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 3–18. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Ameka, F.K
2005 Forms of secondary predication in serializing languages: On depictives in Ewe. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, N.P. Himmelmann & E.F. Schultze-Berndt (eds), 335–378. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Amha, A. & Dimmendaal, G.J
2005 Secondary predicates and adverbials in Nilotic and Omotic: A typological comparison. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, N.P. Himmelmann & E.F. Schultze-Berndt (eds), 299–321. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J.P
2006 Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(3): 531–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H.C. & Sag, I.A
2012 Sign-Based Construction Grammar [CSLI Lecture Notes 193]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bodomo, A.B
2006 The structure of ideophones in African and Asian languages: The case of Dagaare and Cantonese. In Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African Languages and Linguistics in Broad Perspectives, J. Mugane, J.P. Hutchison & D.A. Worman (eds), 203–213. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
de Jong, N
2001 The ideophone in Didinga. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 121–138.
Dingemanse, M
2011 The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. PhD dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Radboud University Nijmegen.
2012 Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10): 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. & Kay, P
1995 Construction Grammar coursebook. Ms, University of California at Berkeley.
Fischer, O
2011 Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Semblance and Signification [Iconicity in Language and Literature 10], P. Michelucci, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 55–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S
1998 The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese [Studies in Japanese Linguistics 10]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J.J
(eds) 1994 Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
2006 Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque [Lincom Studies in Basque Linguistics 06]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Izumi, K
1976 Giseigo/gitaigo-no tokusitu [Some characteristics of mimetics]. In Nihongo-no goi-to hyoogen [Japanese vocabulary and expressions]. [Nihongo Koza (4) (Lecture on Japanese (4))], T. Suzuki (ed.), 105–151. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Kadooka, K
2007 Nihongo-onomatope-goi-ni okeru keitai-teki/on’in-teki-taikeisei-ni tuite (On the morphological and phonological systematicity of the onomatopoeic vocabulary of Japanese). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kageyama, T
2007 Explorations in the conceptual semantics of mimetic verbs. In Current Issues in the History and Structure of Japanese, B. Frellesvig, M. Shibatani & J.C. Smith (eds), 27–82. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I. & Schourup, L
1996 Dictionary of Iconic Expressions in Japanese [Trends in Linguistics Documentation 12]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kindaichi, H
1978 Giongo/gitaigo gaisetu (An overview of mimetics). In Giongo/gitaigo-ziten (A dictionary of mimetics) [Kadokawa Syo-Ziten 12 (Kadokawa concise dictionary 12)], T. Asano (ed.), 3–25. Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
Kita, S
1997 Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35(2): 379–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 World-view of protolanguage speakers as inferred from semantics of sound symbolic words: A case of Japanese mimetics. In The Origins of Language: Unraveling Evolutionary Forces, N. Masataka (ed.), 25–38. Tokyo: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, M
1994 Secondary predicates. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3(1): 25–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, A
2007 Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, S.H. Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong-In. https://​files​.nyu​.edu​/ma988​/public​/Phase​_in​_Words​_Final​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mikami, K
2006 Nihongo-no giongo/gitaigo-ni okeru imi-no kakutyoo: konseki-teki-ninti/yoki-teki-ninti-no kanten-kara (The semantic extension of Japanese mimetics: From the perspective of vestigial and prospective cognition). Nihongo Nihonbungaku kenkyu (Studies on Japanese Language and Literature) 57: 199–217.Google Scholar
Miyata, A
2001 Byoosya-koobun-no seiritu-zyooken: Ninti-ron-teki-siten-kara (Constraints on the depictive construction: From a cognitive point of view). Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association , 143–153.
Nasu, A
2002 Nihongo-onomatope-no gokeisei-to inritu-koozoo (The word formation and prosodic structure of Japanese onomatopoeia). PhD dissertation, University of Tsukuba.
Sells, P
2013 Overview: The grammar of mimetics. Introductory remarks of the Grammar of Mimetics workshop, SOAS, University of London, 10 May 2013.
Shibagaki, R
2013 Analysing Secondary Predication in East Asian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Tada, H
2010 Gitaigo-doosi-ni okeru <tikaku/zokusei>-kootai-no tokuisei-ni tuite (On the peculiarity of the <perceptual/attributive> alternation in mimetic verbs). Paper presented at the Eighth Fukuoka University Linguistics Colloquium, Fukuoka University.
Talmy, L
1996 Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In Language and Space [Language, Speech, and Communication 2], P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M.F. Garrett (eds), 211–276. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tamori, I
1980 Cooccurrence restrictions on onomatopoeic adverbs and particles. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 7: 151–171.Google Scholar
1993 Nihongo-onomatope-no toogo-hantyuu (Syntactic categories of Japanese onomatopoeia). In Onomatopia: gion-/gitaigo-no rakuen (Onomatopia: A utopia of mimetics), H. Kakehi & I. Tamori (eds), 17–75. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Google Scholar
Tamori, I. & Schourup, L
1999 Onomatope: Keitai-to imi (Onomatopoeia: Form and meaning) [Niti-ei-taisyoo-kenkyuu siriizu (A series of comparative studies of Japanese and English) 6]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Toratani, K
1999 Aspectual matching and mimetics in Japanese. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Western Conference on Linguistics 11: 495–507.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, N
2005 A constructional approach to mimetic verbs. In Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots [Constructional Approaches to Language 4], M. Fried & H.C. Boas (eds), 137–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uehara, S
1998 Syntactic Categories in Japanese: A Cognitive and Typological Introduction [Studies in Japanese Linguistics 9]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Usuki, T. & Akita, K
2013 Fiction in an encyclopedia: A Generative Lexicon approach to fictive mimetic resultatives in Japanese. In Gengogaku-kara-no tyooboo 2013: Hukuoka-gengo-gakkai 40-syuunen-kinen-ronbunsyuu (The view from linguistics: Papers from the 40th anniversary of Fukuoka Linguistic Circle), Fukuoka Linguistic Circle (ed.), 308–321. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., R.D
2005 Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, F.K.E. & Kilian-Hatz, C
(eds) 2001 Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamanashi, M
1988/2007 Hiyu-to rikai (Figure of speech and understanding) [Korekusyon Nintikagaku (Cognitive Science Collection) 5]. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kwon, Nahyun & Shaoyun Yu
2018. Experimental evidence for the productivity of total reduplication in Japanese ideophones and ordinary vocabulary. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.