Part of
Dimensions of Iconicity
Edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 15] 2017
► pp. 8596
References
Bartko, N. V
2001Английские итеративные RL-глаголы и категория глагольной множественности (English iterative RL-verbs and the category of verb multiplicity). In Verb Categories and Sentence Structure. Proceedings of the International Conference, 15–18. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.
Dahl, R
1982The BFG. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E
1978On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels: Signs and sound. Studia Linguistica 32: 80–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fudge, B
1970Phonological structure and “Expressiveness”. Journal of Linguistics 6: 161–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazov-Ginzberg, A. M
1965Был ли язык изобразителен в своих истоках? (Was the Language Imitative at its Source?). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
1933Symbolic value of the vowel i. In Linguistica: Selected Papers in English, French and German, O. Jespersen (ed.), 283–303. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Leontyev, A. A
1969Внутренняя мотивированность языкового знака как лингвистическая и психологическая проблема (The inner motivation of the language sign as a linguistic and a psychological problem). In Proceedings of the Seminar on the Motivation of the Language Sign , 51–53. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press.
Marchand, H
1969Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S
1994Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic, J. Hoopes (ed.). Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shamina, E. A
2002How it sounds: Words of disapproval in American English and Russian. SPELTA Newsletter 23: 9–10.Google Scholar
2013Восприятие эмоционально-оценочной лексики неродного языка: универсальные и частноязыковые факторы (Perception of foreign emotive words: Universal and language specific factors). In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of the International Society of Applied Psycholinguistics , 272–273. Moscow: ISAPL.
Voronin, S. V
1982Основы фоносемантики (Foundations of Phonosemantics). Leningrad: Leningrad University Press.Google Scholar
2004Английские ономатопы: фоносемантическая классификация (English Onomatopes: A Phonosemantic Classification). St. Petersburg: Gelikon Plus.Google Scholar
2005aThe universal classification of onomatopes twenty-five years on. In Iconicity, Glottogenesis, Semiosis, S. V. Voronin (ed.), 30–38. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
2005bTowards a phonosematic typology of RL-multiplicatives: A case study of iconicity in grammar. In Iconicity, Glottogenesis, Semiosis, S. V. Voronin (ed.), 40–48. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. P
1974Фонетическое значение (The Phonetic Meaning). Leningrad: Leningrad University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Flaksman, Maria
2022. Echoes of the past. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18],  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.