Cover not available
Part of
Dimensions of Iconicity
Edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 15] 2017
► pp. 263–286

Iconization of sociolinguistic variables

The case of archetypal female characters in classic Hollywood cinema

| Stanford University

This study examines the interaction between linguistic variables and other semiotic resources in the visual media. It argues that many of the suprasegmental variables in classic Hollywood cinema iconically and sound-symbolically represent the major archetypes of the era, namely, the femme fatale, the dumb blonde, and the screwball heroine. It also argues that other visual, cinematic devices worked to actively develop and fortify this iconic relation. Due to this iconization process, the underlying ideologies behind the linguistic variables were more easily naturalized, enabling their wider dissemination. The evidence for this argument comes from acoustic and statistical analyses of pitch and voice quality variables produced by actresses portraying the three archetypes. The quantitative approach combined with additional qualitative analyses of relevant pitch contours and film scenes show the systematic difference between the archetypes in the usage of these variables, and demonstrate the iconic link between linguistic variables, archetypes, and film imagery.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Iconicity and iconization
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Selection of films and actresses
    • 3.2Selection and analysis of the data
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Inter-speaker variation: Pitch
    • 4.2Intra-speaker variation: Pitch
    • 4.3Variation in voice quality
    • 4.4The distinctive packaging of suprasegmental variables
  • 5.Iconization and archetypes
    • 5.1Iconization and femmes fatales
    • 5.2Iconicity and dumb blondes
    • 5.3Iconicity and screwball heroines
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 8 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.15.15jeo
References
Agha, A
2003 The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication 23: 231–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S
2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 . Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, A
2011 Falling in love again and again: Marlene Dietrich and the iconization of non-native English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(5): 627–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D
2013 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 5.3.51. 〈[URL]〉 (23 September 2016).Google Scholar
Cook, P
1979 Feminism and cinema: Star signs. Screen 20(3): 80–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cukor, G
1949 Adam’s Rib. Hollywood cA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
Donen, S
1957 Kiss Them for Me. Hollywood CA: Twentieth Century-Fox.Google Scholar
Dyer, R
1998 Resistance through charisma: Rita Hayworth and Gilda. In Kaplan (ed.), 91–99.Google Scholar
Eckert, P
1991 Social polarization and the choice of linguistic variants. In New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, P. Eckert (ed.), 213–231. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2): 70–80.Google Scholar
Gal, S
2013 Tastes of talk: Qualia and the moral flavor of signs. Anthropological Theory 13(1–2): 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garnett, T
1946 The Postman Always Rings Twice. Hollywood CA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
Gehring, W. D
1986 Screwball Comedy: A Genre of Madcap Romance. New York NY: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. & Ladefoged, P
2001 Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29(4): 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, B. K
1986 Film Genre Reader. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J
1980 The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3): 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, H
1953 Niagara. Hollywood CA: Twentieth Century-Fox.Google Scholar
Hawks, H
1940 His Girl Friday. Hollywood CA: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
1941 Ball of Fire. Hollywood CA: RKO Radio Pictures.Google Scholar
1946 The Big Sleep. Hollywood CA: Warner Bros.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, A
1958 Vertigo. Hollywood CA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T. & Gal, S
2000 Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, P. Kroskrity (ed.), 35–84. Santa Fe NM: SAR.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. A
1998 Introduction to 1978 edition. In Kaplan (ed.), Women in Film Noir 1998, 15–19. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H. & Klatt, L. C
1990 Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87(2): 820–857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, A. & Radstone, S
1990 The Women’s Companion to International Film. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, G
1949 My Friend Irma. Hollywood CA: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
Maurer, D., Pathman, T. & Mondloch, C. J
2006 The shape of boubas: Sound-shape sorrespondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science 9(3): 316–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minnelli, V
1957 Designing Woman. Hollywood CA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
Moore, E
2004 Sociolinguistic style: A multidimensional resource for shared identity creation. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 49(3): 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J. J
1994 The frequency codes underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J. J. Ohala (eds), 325–347.Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S
1998 The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2: 1893–1913, Peirce Edition Project (eds). Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J
1979 The perception of fundamental frequency declination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66(2): 363–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Place, J
1998 Women in film noir. In Kaplan (ed.), Women in Film Noir, 47–58. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Podesva, R. J
2011 Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 10(5): 1–32.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2008 R: A Language and Enviroment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 〈[URL]〉 (23 September 2016).Google Scholar
Reis, I
1947 The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer. Hollywood CA: RKO Radio Pictures.Google Scholar
Robson, M
1954 Phffft!. Hollywood CA: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
Ruggles, W
1943 Slightly Dangerous. Hollywood CA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
Sapir, E
1929 A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12(3): 225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F
1989[1916] Cours de linguistique générale. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Shrader, P
1986 Notes on film noir. In Film Genre Reader, B. K. Grant (ed.), 229–242. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M
2005 Axes of evals. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 6–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, J., Pryce G., Timmins, C. & Gunter, B
2013 Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect. Language 89(3): 501–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vicenik, C
Phonation-measurement (Praat Script). (18 October 2016).
Wilder, B
1944 Double Indemnity. Hollywood CA: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
1959 Some Like It Hot. Hollywood CA: United Artists.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q
2008 Rhotacization and the ‘Beijing Smooth Operator’: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(2): 2012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Boberg, Charles
2020. Diva Diction. American Speech 95:4 ► pp. 441 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.