Mark Dingemanse | Radboud University | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
This chapter makes the case for ‘ideophone’ as a comparative concept: a notion that captures a recurrent typological pattern and provides a template for understanding language-specific phenomena that prove similar. It revises an earlier definition to account for the observation that ideophones typically form an open lexical class, and uses insights from canonical typology to explore the larger typological space. According to the resulting definition, a canonical ideophone is a member of an open lexical class of marked words that depict sensory imagery. The five elements of this definition can be seen as dimensions that together generate a possibility space to characterise cross-linguistic diversity in depictive means of expression. This approach allows for the systematic comparative treatment of ideophones and ideophone-like phenomena. Some phenomena in the larger typological space are discussed to demonstrate the utility of the approach: phonaesthemes in European languages, specialised semantic classes in West-Chadic, diachronic diversions in Aslian, and depicting constructions in signed languages.
2010Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348.
Ajello, R., Mazzoni, L. and Nicolai, F.
2001Linguistic gestures: Mouthing in Italian Sign Language. In The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages, P. Boyes Braem and R. L. Sutton-Spence (eds), 231–246. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
2008Phonosemantic evidence for the mimetic stratum in the Japanese lexicon. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Sarah Bersonet al. (eds), 1–12. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
2009A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of Japanese mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University. [URL]
2011Toward a phonosemantic definition of iconic words. In Semblance and Signification [Iconicity in Language and Literature 10], P. Michelucci, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds), 3–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2015Sound symbolism. In Handbook of Pragmatics, J. -O. Östman and J. Verschueren (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1994Yir-Yoront ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 161–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2017Structuring sensory imagery: Ideophones across languages and cultures. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 149-153.
2014Ideophones and (non-)arbitrariness in the K’iche’ poetry of Humberto Ak’abal. Pragmatics and Society 5: 406–418.
Bergen, B. K.
2004The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80: 290–311.
Bergman, B. and Dahl, Ö.
1994Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, C. Bache, H. Basbøll and C. -E. Lindberg (eds), 397–422. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2013Mwaghavul expressives. In Chadic Linguistics 8, H. Tourneux (ed.), 53–75. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.
Bolinger, D. L.
1961Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. The Hague: Mouton.
Bowler, M. and Gluckman, J.
2018Intensifying ideophones in three Luhya languages. In Proceedings of TripleA 4, E. Bogal-Allbritten and E. Coppock (eds), 31–47. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.
Brown, D. and Chumakina, M.
2013What there might be and what there is: An introduction to Canonical Typology. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, D. Brown, M. Chumakina and G. G. Corbett (eds), 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1934Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: G. Fischer.
Burenhult, N. and Majid, A.
2011Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. The Senses and Society 6: 19–29.
Childs, G. T.
1994African ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H.
2016Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123: 324–347.
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J.
1990Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805.
Corbett, G. G.
2007Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83: 8–42.
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1974Neutralization, iteratives, and ideophones: The locus of language in Jamaica. In Pidgins and Creoles: Current Trends and Prospects, D. DeCamp and I. F. Hancock (eds), 46–60. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
1972Notes on expressive meaning. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, and G. C. Phares (eds), 440–447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
1976Expressives in Semai. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 13: 249–264.
2001Les expressifs de Surin, et où cela conduit. Bulletin de l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient 88: 261–269.
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672.
2014Making new ideophones in Siwu: Creative depiction in conversation. Pragmatics and Society 5: 384–405.
2017Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70: 363–384.
2018Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3: 4. 1–30.
Doke, C. M.
1935Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
2017Depicting and describing meanings with iconic signs in Norwegian Sign Language. Gesture 17: 375–399.
Ferrara, L. and Hodge, G.
2018Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 716. 1–716.15.
1978On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels. Studia Linguistica 32: 80–90.
2008Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 34]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gxowa, N. C.
1994Ideophones in Xhosa. M.A. thesis, University of Stellenbosch.
1998The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
2007Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11: 119–132.
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86: 663–687.
Hogue, R. L.
2011OOs and AAs: Mouth gestures as ideophones in American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Gallaudet University. [URL]
Hyman, L. M.
1975Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2017Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 196–220.
Iwasaki, N., Sells, P. and Akita, K.
(eds)2017The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition, and Translation. London: Routledge.
Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P. and Vigliocco, G.
2007What do English speakers know about gera-gera and yota-yota?: A cross-linguistic investigation of mimetic words for laughing and walking. Japanese-Language Education around the Globe 17: 53–78.
2013Ideophones in Japhug Rgyalrong. Anthropological Linguistics 55: 256–287.
1921Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Johnson, M. R.
1976Toward a definition of the ideophone in Bantu. Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 240–253.
1999Ideophone: Eine typologische Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung afrikanischer Sprachen. Habilitationsschrift, Universität zu Köln.
1997Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415.
2002Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78: 258–286.
2004A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kunene, D. P.
1965The ideophone in Southern Sotho. Journal of African Languages 4: 19–39.
2015 The natural motivation of sound symbolism. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Queensland.
2017Total reduplication in Japanese ideophones: An exercise in Localized Canonical Typology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2: 40. 1–31.
Kwon, N. and Round, E. R.
2015Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25: 1–27.
Le Guen, O2012Ideophones in Yucatec Maya. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America (CILLA V). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. [URL]
Levelt, W. J. M.
1980On-line processing constraints on the properties of signed and spoken language. In Signed and Spoken Language: Biological Constraints on Linguistic Form, U. Bellugi and M. Studdert-Kennedy (eds), 141–160. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.
1975The intonational system of English. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lu, J. C. and Goldin-Meadow, S.
2018Creating images with the stroke of a hand: Depiction of size and shape in sign language. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1276. 1–15.
1990Tzeltal Maya affect verbs: Psychological salience and expressive functions of language. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on General Topics in American Indian Linguistics, D. J. Costa (ed.), 61–72. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Matisoff, J. A.
2003Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies 33: 1–58.
2018Iconicity in the lexicon: The semantic categories of lexical reduplication. Studies in Language 41: 813–842.
McCawley, J. D.
1968The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.
2012Ideophones in Alto Perene (Arawak) from Eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36: 300–344.
1993Ideophones in KiVunjo-Chaga. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3: 185–216.
1968Ideophones from a syntactic point of view. Journal of West African Languages 5: 107–117.
Nuckolls, J. B.
1996Sounds like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nuckolls, J. B.
1999The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 225–252.
Nuckolls, J. B.
2004To be or not to be ideophonically impoverished. In Texas Linguistic Forum 47: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society, W. F. Chiang, E. Chun, L. Mahalingappa and S. Mehus (eds), 131–142. Austin: University of Texas.
Nuckolls, J. B., Nielsen, E., Stanley, J. A. and Hopper, R.
2016The systematic stretching and contracting of ideophonic phonology in Pastaza Quichua. International Journal of American Linguistics 82: 95–116.
2002A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, and D. Quinto-Pozos (eds), 175–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, C. S.
1955Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.
Perlman, M., Little, H., Thompson, B. and Thompson, R. L.
2018Iconicity in signed and spoken vocabulary: A comparison between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1433. 1–16.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. and Vigliocco, G.
2010Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 227. 1–15. .
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M. and Lupyan, G.
2015Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE 10: e0137147. 1–17.
Rai, N. K., Bickel, B., Banjade, G., Gaenszle, M., Lieven, E., Paudyal, N., Rai, I. and Stoll, S.
2005Triplication and ideophones in Chintang. In Contemporary Issues in Nepalese Linguistics, Y. Yadava, G. Bhattarai, R. R. Lohani, B. Prasain and K. Parajuli (eds), 205–209. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.
2012Ideophones in Awetí. Ph.D. dissertation, Kiel: University of Kiel.
1913History as Literature, and Other Essays. New York: C. Scribner’s sons.
Samarin, W. J.
1969The art of Gbeya insults. International Journal of American Linguistics 35: 323–329.
Samarin, W. J.
1970Inventory and choice in expressive language. Word 26: 153–169.
Sien, N. -C.
1997An autosegmental analysis of ideophones in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
1960Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Taub, S. F.
2001Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1999Ideophone. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9: 118–120.
2011Analogy-making in the Semai sensory world. The Senses and Society 6: 86–95.
Uhlenbeck, E. M.
1952The study of wordclasses in Javanese. Lingua 3: 322–354.
Waugh, L. R.
1994Degrees of iconicity in the lexicon. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 55–70.
Webster, A. K.
2017 “So it’s got three meanings dil dil”: Seductive ideophony and the sounds of Navajo poetry. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 173–195.
Werner, H. and Kaplan, B.
1963Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought. New York: Wiley.
Wescott, R. W.
1977Ideophones in Bini and English. Forum Linguisticum 2: 1–13.
Westermann, D. H.
1927Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In Festschrift Meinhof, F. Boas (ed.), 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.
2016Semantic specificity of perception verbs in Maniq. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University.
Wnuk, E. and Majid, A.
2014Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition 131: 125–138.
Cited by 14 other publications
2022. Silence, Cessation and Stasis: The Ethnopoetics of “Absence” in Bit Expressives. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
DINGEMANSE, MARK, MARCUS PERLMAN & PAMELA PERNISS
2020. Construals of iconicity: experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
DINGEMANSE, MARK & BILL THOMPSON
2020. Playful iconicity: structural markedness underlies the relation between funniness and iconicity. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 203 ff.
2022. Making Referents Seen and Heard Across Signed and Spoken Languages: Documenting and Interpreting Cross-Modal Differences in the Use of Enactment. Frontiers in Psychology 13
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.