Cover not available
Part of
Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives
Edited by Kimi Akita and Prashant Pardeshi
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 16] 2019
► pp. 35–56

Chapter 2
The phonological structure of Japanese mimetics and motherese

| National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (NINJAL)
Japanese is known to have a rich inventory of words both in mimetics and motherese (baby talk words). The purpose of this chapter is to examine interesting similarities that these two types of vocabulary exhibit in phonological structure. First of all, words in both mimetics and motherese are basically disyllabic although mimetic words also permit longer strings of syllables. Second, they are subject to a prosodic restriction by which word-final sequences of a light syllable plus a heavy one are prohibited. Third, all baby talk words are lexically ‘accented’, i.e., pronounced with an abrupt pitch fall, as opposed to ‘unaccented’. This prosodic feature is also shared by mimetic words. This fact is astonishing because a majority of native words in adult Japanese are lexically unaccented, which raises the interesting question of why mimetics and motherese are accentually different from the adult language.
By carefully analyzing various phenomena in adult phonology, this chapter presents evidence that the phonological biases commonly shown by mimetics and motherese represent unmarked phonological structures of the language that emerge in derived words in adult phonology. This allows us to link mimetics and motherese on the one hand, and adult and child phonology, on the other.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntactic and morphological structures
  • 3.Phonological structures
    • 3.1Word length
    • 3.2Prosodic structure
    • 3.3Accent
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.03kub
References (41)
References
Fromkin, V. and Rodman, R. 1988. An Introduction to Language (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2014. Nihongo no Onomatope: Onshōchō to Kōzō [Mimetic Words in Japanese: Sound Symbolism and Structure]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Hattori, S. 1954. On’inron kara mita kokugo no akusento [Japanese accent considered from a phonological point of view]. Kokugo Kenkyu 2. Reproduced in M. Tokugawa (ed.) Akusento [Accent], 37–65. Tokyo: Yūseidō.Google Scholar
Hayashi, O. 1957. Goi [vocabulary]. In Kotoba no Taikei (Kōza Gendai Kokugogaku II), E. Iwabuchi et al. (eds), Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.Google Scholar
Herlofsky, W. J. 1998. The acquisition of Japanese iconic expressions: Giongo vs. gitaigo. Journal of Japanese Linguistics and Education 5: 1–8. Nagoya Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. and Ohala, J. J. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Sound Symbolism. L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. Ohala (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, J. 1986. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Published by Garland Press, 1988.Google Scholar
1990. Prosodic minimality in Japanese. In CLS 26-II: The Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, M. Ziolkowski, M. Noske, and K. Deaton (eds), 213–239. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ito, J., Kitagawa, Y. and Mester, A. 1996. Prosodic faithfulness and correspondence: Evidence from a Japanese argot. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5: 217–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, J., Kubozono, H. and Mester, A. 2017. A prosodic account of consonant gemination in Japanese loanwords. In The Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants, H. Kubozono (ed.), 283–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, J. and Mester, A. 1995. The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking. In Papers in Optimality Theory [University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18], J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, and S. Urbanczyk (eds), 181–209.Google Scholar
1999. The phonological lexicon. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, N. Tsujimura (ed.), 62–100. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015. Word formation and phonological processes. In The Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, H. Kubozono (ed.), 363–395. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, S. and Wolf, M. 2010. On the existence of root-initial-accenting suffixes: An elicitation study of Japanese [-zu]. Linguistics 48: 837–864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawakami, S. 1977. Nihongo Onsei Gaisetsu [Introduction to the Sounds of Japanese]. Tokyo: Ōhūsha.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. 1995. Constraint interaction in Japanese phonology: Evidence from compound accent. Phonology at Santa Cruz (PASC) 4: 21–38. University of California at Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
1996. Syllable and accent in Japanese: Evidence from loanword accentuation, The Bulletin 211: 71–82. The Phonetic Society of Japan.Google Scholar
1997. Lexical markedness and variation: A nonderivational account of Japanese compound accent. WCCFL 15: 273–287.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. 1999. Mora and syllable. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, N. Tsujimura (ed.), 31–61. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. 2002. Shingo wa Kōshite Tsukurareru [How Are New Words Coined?]. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
2003a. The syllable as a unit of prosodic organization in Japanese. In The syllable in Optimality Theory, C. Fery and R. van der Vijver (eds), 99–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, H. 2003b. Accent of alphabetic acronyms in Tokyo Japanese. In A New Century of Phonology and Phonological Theory: A Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, T. Honma, M. Okazaki, T. Tabata, and S. Tanaka (eds), 356–370. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. 2004. On’in kōzō kara mita tanjungo to gōseigo no kyōkai [The phonological boundary between simplex and complex words in Japanese]. In Bunpō to Onsei 4 [Speech and Grammar 4], Spoken Language Research Group (ed.), 123–143. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2006. Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116: 1140–1170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Japanese accent. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, S. Miyagawa and M. Saito (eds), 165–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010. Accentuation of alphabetic acronyms in varieties of Japanese. Lingua 120: 2323–2335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Japanese pitch accent. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 5. M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume and K. Rice (eds), 2879–2907. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a. Diphthongs and vowel coalescence. In The Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, H. Kubozono (ed.), 215–249. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, H. 2015b. Loanword phonology. In The Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, H. Kubozono (ed.), 313–361. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, H. 2017a. Accent in Japanese phonology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics (online), M. Aronoff (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b. Tsūjinai Nihongo [Incomprehensible Japanese]. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Prince, A. 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality theory in prosodic morphology. NELS 24: 333–379.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1968. The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Nasu, A. 1995. Onomatope no keitai ni yōkyūsareru inritsu jōken [Prosodic restrictions on Japanese onomatopoeia]. The Bulletin 209: 9–20. The Phonetic Society of Japan.Google Scholar
1999. Onomatope ni okeru yūseika to [p] no yūhyōsei [Voicing in onomatopoeia and the markedness of [p]]. Onsei Kenkyu 3: 52–66.Google Scholar
2005. Onomatope no on’in-kōzō ni miru hi-taishōsei [Asymmetries in mimetic phonology]. Onsei Kenkyu 9: 20–29.Google Scholar
2015. The phonological lexicon and mimetic phonology. In The Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, H. Kubozono (ed.), 253–288. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Okubo, A. 1967. Yōji-gengo no Hattatsu [Development of child language]. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Poser, W. J. 1990. Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Language 66: 78–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. and Croft, W. 2007. Phonological development: Toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics 45: 683–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Akita, Kimi
2021. A typology of depiction marking. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 865 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.