Chapter published in:
Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 22–38

The relationship between iconicity and systematicity in Korean ideophones

| Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
This chapter investigates the relationship between two forms of non-arbitrariness in Korean ideophones: relative iconicity, which is a resemblance-based mapping between relations among multiple forms and relations among multiple meanings (exemplified by paradigmatic consonantal symbolism), and systematicity, which is a statistical regularities-based mapping between form and meaning (exemplified by ideophonic vowel harmony). Using a written corpus of Korean ideophones, the present study quantifies the number of variants in consonantal constellations, where larger constellations are judged to have a higher degree of relative iconicity than smaller constellations. The results reveal that larger constellations are more susceptible to the influence exerted by vowel harmony. This language-internal finding suggests a tight correlation between relative iconicity and systematicity, and allows further investigation into its generalizability from a broad typological perspective.
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.02kwo
References

References

Akita, K.
2009 A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation. Kobe University.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.
2001 Morphological productivity [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95]. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F. and Christiansen, M. H.
2016 “Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(39): 10818–10823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, L. J, Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W.
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M.
2011 “Ezra Pound among the Mawu: ideophones and iconicity in Siwu”, In Semblance and signification, P. Michelucci, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds.), 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse”. Studies in Language 39(4): 946–970.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H. and Monaghan, P.
2015 “Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(10): 603–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, J. F.
1988 Studies in sound symbolism with special reference to English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Frishberg, N.
1975 “Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American sign language”. Language 51: 676–710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M., Sethuraman, N. and Hockema, S.
2010 “Iconicity in expressives: An empirical investigation”. In Experimental and Empirical Methods in the Study of Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, S. Rice and J. Newman (eds.), 163–180. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hamano, S.
1998 The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
1960 “The origin of speech”. Scientific American 203(3): 89–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hays, B and Londe Z. C.
2006 “Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony”. Phonology 23: 59–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. H.
1992 “Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments”. Psychological Review 99(2): 349–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C.-W.
1965 “On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification (with special reference to Korean stops)”. Word 21(3): 339–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K.-O.
1977 “Sound symbolism in Korean”. Journal of Linguistics 13(1): 67–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. S.
1984 Aspects of Korean morphology. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Kwon, N.
2014 “Iconicity in Korean consonantal symbolism”. In Proceedings of the 15th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, J. Hay and E. Parnell (eds.), 176–179. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
Kwon, N. and Round. E.
2015 “Phonaesthemes in morphological theory”. Morphology 25(1): 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N.
2016 “Empirically observed iconicity levels of English phonaesthemes”, Public Journal of Semiotics 7(2): 73–93.Google Scholar
2017 “Total reduplication in Japanese ideophones: An exercise in localized canonical typology”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1): 40, 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Iconicity correlated with vowel harmony in Korean ideophones”. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9(1): 1, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N. and Masuda, K.
2019 "On the ordering of elements in ideophonic echo-words versus prosaic dvandva words, with special reference to Japanese and Korean". Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28(1): 29-53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N.
to appear. “A theoretical extension of Ohala’s frequency code hypothesis”. In Sound symbolism in the history of thought, L. Nobile ed Amsterdam and Philadelphia John Benjamins
in prep. “An experimental investigation on the correlation between type frequency and iconicity in Korean ideophones”. m.s.
Ladefoged, P. and Maddieson, I.
1996 The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Larsen, D. and Heinz, J.
2012 “Neutral vowels in sound-symbolic vowel harmony in Korean”. Phonology 29: 433–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. S.
1992 Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lockwood, G. and Dingemanse, M.
2015 Iconicity in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1246.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J.
1983 “Phonological features and morphological structure”. Papers from the Parasessions, Chicago Linguistic Society 19: 135–161.Google Scholar
McFarland, T.
2010 “Ideophones and templatic morphology in Totonac”, In Rara & rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, J. Wohlgemuth and M. Cysouw (eds.), 235–246. Berline: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H. and Chater, N.
2007 “The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition”. Cognitive Psychology 55(4): 259–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H. and Kirby, S.
2014 “How arbitrary is language?”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369(1651): 20130299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J.
1994 “The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice-pitch”. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
1955 In J. Buchler (ed), Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. and Vigliocco, G.
2010 “Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages”. Frontiers in psychology 1: 227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P. and Vigliocco, G.
2014 The bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B 369 (1651): 20130300. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
1929 “A study in phonetic symbolism”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12(3): 225–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, H.-M.
1999 The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, T.-I.
2012 Hyentaykwuke uysenguytayeuy hyengtaywa umwun yenkwu [Morphological and phonological analyses of ideophones in Modern Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation. Ihwa Women’s University.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J. O.
2017 “Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 8(5): e01441. 10.1002/wcs.1441Google Scholar
Tufvesson, S.
2011 “Analogy-making in the Semai sensory world”. The Senses and Society 6(1): 86–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuraw, K.
2010 “A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(2): 417–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar